The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMeeting PresentationBannock County Office of Emergency Management OBJECTIVES ► Review the Evolution of Emergency Management and the Compliance Documents that Programs adhere to. ► Review Presidential Policy 8 in creating National Planning Framework. ► Review the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to include incident types and training and qualification standards. ► Office of Emergency Management (OEM) Mission areas and Core Capabilities for areas of responsibility and implementation. ► Bannock County OEM basic Incident Command Structure }' (^I'�CS). , N ,,i1 OWN% PAV1iCAhCY MANACKMENT 1/17/2024 Evolution of Emergency Management 1803 Congressional Act—New Hampshire Town Fire 1881 Ameiicnn Red Crass 1917 Flood Conhol Act 1932 Reconstruction Finance Corp (RFC) 1953 RFC Wquidalion Act 1934 Bureau of Public Road 1950 Disaster Relief Act — President provide Federal assistance to States upon declaration 1950 Federal Civil Defense Act — Threat of Nuclear War basic preparedness of Civil Defense 1960 Office of Emer ency Preparedness — due to Hurricane Donna, Carla and 7.TMontana Earthquake 1968 National Flood Insnimrce Aa f'Er. 11 OF VICR O F SA4RR(ANCY MANm6FAiF,NT X Bannock County Office of Emergency Management Evolution of Emergency Management 1970 Federal Emergency Man a ement — FEMA was created to minimize disorder ofP100 agencies 1974 Disaster RBIIefAc1 1978 Reo.ganiadion Plan No. 3 1988 Stafford Act — statutory authority for most Federal response activities with FEMA 1992 Federal Response Plan September 11, 2001 2002 Homeland Sccurity Act 2003 Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 — single, comprehensive NIMS 2004 National Response Plan — replaced Federal Response Plan 2008 Nationnl Response Fmrnework W � (OFPIt.h:OFitA,1R12CF,NCY YfANAt; RdrRN'r 1/17/2024 2 PROGRAMS ARE COMPLIANCE ORIENTED Public Law 112-96 Presidential Directive 8 (PPD -8) I$rst Net 2012 National Preparedness 2011 Presidential Directive 51 (PPD -51) Robert T Homeland Security 2007 Stafford Act 1. HSPI) 5 Presidential Directive 20 (PPD -2o) NINE 4 US Cybersecurtty 2012 '??+ Executive Directive 51(HSPD-20) National Continuity Policy Bannock County Office of Emergency Management Evolving Doctrine Presidential Policy Directive 8 (PPD -8) describes the Nation's approachto preparedness—one that involves the whole community, including individuals, businesses, community- and faith -based organizations, schools, tribes, and all levels of government, working together to build and sustain preparedness capabilities. The National Preparedness Goal outlines the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover From the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk to the Nation. The National Preparedness System outlines the approach, resources, and tools for achieving the Pmpamdness Goal. The National Planning Frameworks contain succinct, high-level descriptions of the coordinating structures necessary to build and sustain the core capabilities within each of the five mission areas (Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery). The National Incident Management System (NIMS) provides the template for the management of incidents. 01FIC:t:0b'94[2ItC:41XCY NAYhGEWTINT 1/17/2024 1/17/2024 State & Local Leadership and the Framework • States are sovereign entities, and the Governor has responsibility for public safety and welfare; Slates are the main players in coordinating resources and capabilities and obtaining support from other States and the Federal government Governor • Homeland Security Advisor • Director State Emergency Management Agency • Stale Coordinating Officer • Local officials have primary responsibility for community preparedness and response • Elected/Appointed Officials (Mayor) • Emergency Manager • Public Safety Officials • Individuals and Households are key starting points for emergency preparedness and support community efforts Bannock County Office of Emergency Management 4 "Idaho Office of Civil Defense— Idaho Bureau of Disaster Services — SERC/HazMat focus- IOEW Superfund Amendments and ReauthorizationAct (SARA) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces SARA Title III. The regulations implementing SARA Title Blare codified in Title 40 of the Code Federal Regulations, Parts 350 through 372.. SARA Title If requires that the SERC establish Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) SARA Title in has four major components: 1. Emergency planning (Sections 302 and 303) 2. Emergency release notification (Section 304) 3. Hazardous chemical inventory (Sections 311 and 312) 4. Toxic chemical release inventory (Section 313) h � t�l •) OFFICR fiF Fk1fiRGPNGI" \1fiN,iC;fiMP•.tJ'T LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEES Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-KnowAct (EPCRA) A free-standing law, the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act of 1986 was commonly known as SARATitle III. It's purpose is to encourage and support emergency planning efforts at the state and local levels and to provide the public and local governments with information conceming potential chemical hazards present in their communities. ! OFT=I(;F.OR ftM1t1:RGF.NC.Y \1ANAGIiDfRN'f 1/17/2024 Bannock County Office of Emergency Management 5 1/17/2024 What NIMS Is: What NIMS Is NOT: •A comprehensive, nationwide, systematic •A response plan approach to incident management, -Only used during large-scale including the Incident Command System, incidents Multiagency Coordination Systems, and •A communications plan Public Information (Homeland Security -Only applicable to certain emergency Policy Directive (HSPD) 5 and Presidential management/incident response Policy Directive (PPD) 7 and 8) personnel .A set of preparedness concepts and -Only the Incident Command System principles for all hazards or an organization chart .Essential principles for a common •A static system operating picture and interoperability of communications and information management -Standardized resource management procedures enabling coordination among different jurisdictions/organizations .Scalable, can be used for all incidents (from day-to-day to large-scale) -A dynamic system promoting ongoing management and maintenance Bannock County Office of Emergency Management 6 NIMS Curriculum - Incident Complexity Types Type 1 - Most complex, requiring national resources for safe and effective managementand operation Type 2 - Incident extends beyond the capabilities for local control and is expected to go into multiple operational periods Type 3 - Incident needs exceed capabilities, the appropriate ICS positions should be added to match the complexity of the incident Type 4 - Command staff and general staff functions are activated only if needed Type 5 - The incident can be handled with one or two single resources with up to six personnel NIMS Training A basic premise of NIMS is that all incidents begin and end locally. The federal govermnent supports state, tribal, and local authorities when their resources are overwhelmed or anticipated to be overwhelmed. The intention of the federal government in these situations is not to command the response, but rather to support the affected state, tribal, and local authorities. This is most easily achieved when all the entities are participating in a unified system of emergency management and incident response. The training and qualification of emergency management response personnel is critical to the success of NIMS implementation nationally. The NIMS/ICSDecision Tree lays out a conceptual framework that maintains a systematic process for the identification of training courses and personnel qualifications. This process produces trained and qualified emergency management personnel. Training is identified by an individual expected response function as depicted below. 1/17/2024 Bannock County Office of Emergency Management 7 NIMS Core Curriculum: Incident Complexity determines Training _._. povnwn. High apecryk 011171 ionoNalatlatlo mvnToxenh0. PeNelb fJAalnllon C CONtl 19.OEMpery I FJAd' llM1dkM Flma Pop Q "i—I EOCbr b uR IeX QM mXleNrp pa tlalAelRatlw rNeJMMImIC � CyW PII d Mplk 1pp0 Scbal Flfl CEMmortmgp Paha FaWation IB 9 �frzlmlasaJtl.a.� muliwwlJorelmaporep su eaan Fareaa.:ceMmwrmnre ce wp. C pEW � nm m Manbtly I&SW �. IC9dY0 Typal. IC9 sop O n O 3 a Bannock County Office of Emergency Management >ypas ..... fAW _ _ FI,1 i Name�UYaA 11TVN4�4A-5neraxM1rcaa%taas6RnMLtieeYrvnimun�t:Wpe -� am artVrxe�� rMar 011PICT 0P EMERC, EN YMAN:1GINENT 1/17/2024 A Bannock County Office of Emergency Management Emergency Management Director Leads and instructs the Emergency Management Program for Bannock County. Serves as the principal Emergency Management Advisorto the Board of County Commissioners; is directly responsible for County's emergency readiness and planning/preparedness for coordinated response and recovery from major emergencies and disasters and coordinates mitigation activities including grant submissions. As the Commissioners' Authorized Representative, acts as the single point of contact for all local, regional, state and federal emergency management activities, and oversees application, implementation and compliance of all U.S. Department of Homeland Security programs and grants. F•OCActiw dan Ontinns Day to Day Operations Monitoring Portia] Actiwtion Foll Activation 1/17/2024 Bannock County Office of Emergency Management 9 1/17/2024 Questions? OFFICE -1)( EUPHCa NCY AIAYAUtXENT fdL� i J�1�4l ID'`t� 1�wro�i�es,v Bannock County Office of Emergency Management 10