Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Items #1-4
CHUBBUCK 1 0 0 H 0 Memo To: Impact Fee Committee Office of Community Services & Economic Development 290 E Linden Ave., Chubbuck, ID 83202 208.237.2430 www.CityofChubbuck.us From: Devin Hillam, Community Services & Economic Development Director ,N Date: February 1, 2022 Re: Development Impact Fee Information Provided in this packet are historical building permit data, a Treasurer's Report of revenues and expenditures, and information provided by the Fire, Police, and Parks Department. A great deal of information pertaining to adopted capital improvement plans and impact fee studies was provided for the January committee meeting so I'd encourage you to review that information as well. As a note, I contacted Deloy Stuart who stated that the Building Contractors Association of Southeast Idaho would have someone at the meeting to discuss their experiences with impact fees. As you review this information, if you have any questions or desire additional materials before the meeting, please let me or any of the relevant department heads know. J:\Planning\Impact Fees\meeting packets\2.8.22\2.1.22 DIF Overview Memo to Committee.docx 1 MFR Multi Family Residential = Duplex, 3 plex, 4 Plex, & Apartment. Buildings=living units SFR Single Family Residence = Single Family Homes, Twin Homes, Town Homes Pheasant Ridge Town Homes constructed 336 units between 10/30/2002 & 9/29/2006 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 201 0 200 9 2008 2007 2006 200 5 2004 200 3 200 2 200 1 JANUARY 4 4 5 8 0 2 2 3 9 2 0 5 6 8 4 7 41 4 14 6 5 FEBUARY 7 2 5 1 8 1 2 5 0 3 1 2 4 2 4 6 6 4 2 1 5 6 MARCH 19 12 35 2 4 11 5 4 7 7 2 6 1 8 7 18 18 17 23 3 9 APRIL 19 1 12 22 4 7 3 3 4 1 0 5 1 8 8 31 31 19 18 11 9 MAY 22 3 10 4 4 13 5 1 4 5 5 0 3 6 8 17 17 19 7 6 5 JUNE 25 8 4 5 3 0 7 0 4 2 2 1 5 3 5 8 8 22 8 4 7 JULY 8 6 2 6 2 4 6 8 5 3 2 3 1 3 8 14 14 23 8 7 4 AUGUST 6 19 9 6 7 8 5 7 3 5 2 1 4 6 4 28 28 22 10 6 6 SEPTEMBER 7 22 10 8 7 5 9 8 14 2 3 0 2 2 3 27 27 9 3 8 5 OCTOBER 8 2 2 2 10 6 4 6 2 8 3 2 2 7 9 9 9 15 15 11 6 NOVEMBER 1 4 7 5 1 3 2 4 5 1 1 1 4 3 7 11 11 8 8 9 4 DECEMBER 4 1 3 7 5 4 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 3 3 11 11 17 10 TOTAL sfr 130 84 104 76 55 64 53 50 58 42 22 27 34 56 67 179 213 173 127 93 76 MFR-# 22=88 5=20 5=20 5=20 5=20 5=20 5=150 0 1=3 2=8 1=4 8 6=2 4 7=2 8 10=6 0 MFR Multi Family Residential = Duplex, 3 plex, 4 Plex, & Apartment. Buildings=living units SFR Single Family Residence = Single Family Homes, Twin Homes, Town Homes Pheasant Ridge Town Homes constructed 336 units between 10/30/2002 & 9/29/2006 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 26 2021 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $7,301,940 2021 5 yr Number of Commercial Permits 22 15 27 2020 2019 2018 5 yr Total Commercial Valuation $2,561,220 2020 $16,177,000 $14,749,713 2019 2019 18 2017 $10,228,312 2018 33 2016 $35,368,780 2017 City of Chubbuck Impact Fee Summary 18 -Jan -22 Revenues FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 YTD Totals Fire Control FC 12,498.84 35,018.97 52,388.04 17,919.02 117,824.87 Law Enforcement LE 12,388.09 30,833.85 44,046.80 11,784.46 99,053.20 Parks PK 13,424.00 40,272.00 220,857.18 123,168.19 397,721.37 Expenditures There have been no expenditures to date. IMPACT FEE FUNDS Total Income $117,824.87 Fire Department Amount � Income � � � . . $117'824.87 -----r---� --------------------------------- -----''----------' - ----------------- �l -- -'- --------------'--- !NewFiroStadon ! � � ' ' ? _________ -- _____________________________ !�taton1Remode| ! ' ? -------- �] -------------'�-------- !Fire Truck Pumper � . . $600'000.00 -------�~—� -- �� -------------',----------------------------------- Fire ! � $1.500000.00 ��������� -- �����������������������''����'�_ !Equipment for New Truck orPumper � �'- $100'800.00 -------�� | | _-----------!--_� ! A/chitectum| Design for New Station � � � � ----------- ? --------------------- -- -- - ------------'-------------- � !So�Cou forNewStaton (Bed��nen'T�b|eo—' ! ' ? ----------------------- -------` -------------------- ---------------- New Lights for Eng�303and 308 � � � -------------------,-----.--------- $7.036.02 Cl -------��-----------------------------------'�------------ ------------ -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ---------- -------+-----------------------------------./------------ -------�r-----------------------------------'�------------ 0 ------- � � � -�-----------------------------------''!------------ -------��-----------------------------------' -------+-----------------------------------'�-----------' -------+-----------------------------------.'------_----' __ __ i � !-- — � � . . � � . Total Income $117,824.87 From: Bill Guiberson To: Devin Hillam Subject: RE: Impact Fee items for LUDC packet and meeting reminder Date: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:22:58 AM Attachments: imaae001.onng Devin, I don't believe I have anything to provide beyond what Rich has put out. Still to date we have not spent any of the impact funds, however we are exploring using them for the remodel. From: Devin Hillam Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:01 AM To: Rodney Burch <rburch@cityofchubbuck.us>; Merlin Miller <mmiller@cityofchubbuck.us>; Bill Guiberson <bguiberson@cityofchubbuck.us> Cc: Kevin England <kengland@cityofchubbuck.us>; Richard Morgan <rmorgan@cityofchubbuck.us> Subject: Impact Fee items for LUDC packet and meeting reminder Hi guys, Just a quick reminder that I'll need any written materials for the impact fee committee by Monday the 31St or early Tuesday the 1St so that info can go out in packets. I've got info from Rich but nothing from anyone else so if you have anything, shoot it over. Also a reminder that the impact fee committee meeting will be on the 8th. Once the agenda for LUDC gets finalized, I'll review and get you an estimate for what time I suspect the impact fee committee will commence that night. Thanks! Best, CHUBBUCK 1 Q 1 H 0 Devin Hillam, AICP, MPA I Community Services & Economic Development Director 290 E Linden Ave. Chubbuck, ID 83202 Office: (208) 239-3239 Work Cell: (208) 557-1781 / ao", t*- \ CHUBBUCK 1 A A H A Memo To: Chubbuck Impact Fee Committee From: Rodney Burch, PWD (acting Parks Director) Date: January 24, 2022 Re: Parks Impact Fees Committee Members, Public Works Department 290 E. Linden, Chubbuck, ID 83202 208.237.2430 — Fax 208.237.2409 www.CityofChubbuck.us Since the City Council adoption of Parks Impact Fees, the following fees have been collected: FY 2019 $13,424 FY 2020 $40,272 FY 2021 $220,857 At the end of FY 2021, the Parks Impact Fee fund balance was $274,553. The project concepts shown in Appendix "A" represent the originally identified project from the initial CIP (Capital Improvement Plan). - Espie Water Education Center - Downtown Plaza — CDA Partnership - Miller Park The project concepts shown in Appendix "B" represent potential projects that may be added to the CIP. - New Day Dog Park - Canal Trails - New Day Trailhead — Skate Park The financial information shown in Appendix "C" represents current revenue received and projections of future revenue and CIP project expenditures. The original CIP is included for reference as Appendix "D". Appendix "A" Original CIP - Projects CONCEPT IMAGES: f RFIMFS11RI ANTE R ARFA- " } fy� March 2017 WATER TANK HOU51 PAVILION (44'X3V RAISED PLANTERS FOR SHADE TREES SLIDE AND STAIRWAY DIMN SLOPE PATH WAY THROLLGH CONSERVATION AREA CONSERVATION IGOS1 URBAN ORCHARD, McKAY STREET I Concept Rendering Espie Park D`L� Water Education Center CONCEPT MASTER PLAN i R P'NOOIDCl10N 4Y IRRIGATION S SAFETY PAIL :POSED FACE SEATING STEPS —AOIJI€FR INFORMATION KIOSK 'ICKLEBAII C O.1 R.'S V dAC$54T1 lima ossium. se LEGEND_ M - Exlstft 13mi ress 0 PMpgWd DVW—. s ©- IdMo CeMraf Gredit Unwn CHUBBUCK RGAL] wo V 1111111111- !i!I '� V V •..r` t1-wi - r�:.. I.6 L ti rkl.rei.!uut�r.w � V 11 r -F _i vat' �• - - a !o!�u� '"' _�J J (-Y ui 0' F v v �. AL w " �v -? u �. _i E AN LAN- _ - .,,J1. ' _ - -_ / ^y ,.r .J ..• i I J a low +o y v AJ 44 5, �40 w ��fM wd� J J .J ✓ J J a ® T r W J d d I'.•w Q (l1 til J Jw[rKS•Olf Lara ➢uwr. ra hubbuck City Downtown CONCEPT MASTER PLAN ° CHUBBUCK -ORTI'I Scale: Vmlo }'-0• 1 0 R H 0 J A I'k ti 1) CONCEPT IMAGES: Concept Master Plan - PLAN VIEW Miller Park /9Ze'-\ CHUBBUCK 1 0 R H 0 Appendix "B" Potential New CIP - Projects dacgsa�v `� — LeHn ossiar, ee I l FacdMes Readwd _ — Ropose+d Rees \ Propow Prood .e City Uri 2022 ftposw 4 4LY �' Miller Pvrtne�uf �. .., Perk ` ! Library f r+�. *. A ;Iry stuar g � l4 t. a. ftrk T' towP. W buc Appendix "C" CIP — Financial Projections $1000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $ 600,000 $ 500,000 $400,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $100,000 Actual Fees Collected 2019 — 2021 Projected Fees 2022 — 2028 Annual Fee Revenue 0 C N Cn in m c v o � � fy N d r I Ln Ln tn to vi. fN It R N N m dr M 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Impact Fee Fund Balance Assuming No Expenditures Impact Fee - Fund Balance o 4 R I © Qn $5,000,000 us T $4,500,000 o M m in m to $4,000,000 m rn cv �w to $3,500,000 ri mLD ry m ff' � rn vk $3,000,000 ni rn � $2,500,000 M rj m iPF Q lh �L7 ri ih $2,000,000 e $1,500,000 Ln in $1,000,000 N Ln C);fIT $500,000 r4 M c�mn 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Potential project lists shown for concept only. These projects have not all been prioritized or accepted for Impact Fee Funding. 2022 Potential Projects: Park Meadows Pavillions $ 40,000.00 Trueman Park - Partnership w/Development $ 75,000.00 New Day Trail Head @ Whitaker Road $ 300,000.00 Skate Park- CDA Partnership $ 100,000.00 2023 Potential Projects: Bi -Centennial Restroom $ 150,000.00 Downtown Plaza - CDA Partnership $ 200,000.00 Dog Park $ 200,000.00 Neighborhood - Park Grant $ 25,000.00 Community Gardens $ 10,000.00 2024 Potential Projects: Pickleball Courts $ 75,000.00 Canal Trail - Funding Match $ 50,000.00 Miller Park- Funding Partnership $ 750,000.00 Neighborhood - Park Grant $ 25,000.00 2025 Potential Projects: Q1 m Canal Trail - Funding Match $ 50,000.00 Hut Shelters - Misc Parks $ 75,000.00 Neighborhood - Park Grant $ 50,000.00 $2,300,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $500,000.00 Impact Fee - Ending Fund Balance L1 Cn m Ln 0 +n n n v � o tn UD m C Go N kn MC Ln -4 N 00 'r M ea ul n LD m O W Q1 m v N Ln -4 O o p 111 rl � N � � n rq cn � cr} 14 +JF Ln 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Appendix "D" Original CIP City of Chubbuck Parks & Recreation Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis September 2018 DONS ©© PUBLIC FINANCE, INC. ©© ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ©® i■ Contents ■■ Section I: Introduction to the Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis............................................2 ProjectOverview.......................................................................................................................................................2 ImpactFee Service Area............................................................................................................................................2 MEPopulation Growth....................................................................................................................................................2 ■o PersonsPer Household (PPH)...............................................................................................................................2 ServiceUnits..............................................................................................................................................................3 Section II: Parks Capital Improvement Plan...................................................................................................................4 SystemImprovements..............................................................................................................................................4 Existing Park Acreage and Amenities........................................................................................................................4 Existing Park Acreage Inventory...........................................................................................................................4 ExistingPark Amenities.........................................................................................................................................5 LandImprovement Costs......................................................................................................................................5 ScheduleFor Improvements.................................................................................................................................5 FundingCapital Facilities...........................................................................................................................................6 HistoricFunding Sources.......................................................................................................................................6 BondFunding........................................................................................................................................................6 ImpactFees...........................................................................................................................................................6 Summary of Time and Price Differential...................................................................................................................6 Equityof Impact Fees................................................................................................................................................6 Section III: Parks Impact Fee Analysis............................................................................................................................7 ImpactFee Overview.................................................................................................................................................7 ParksLevel of Service................................................................................................................................................7 ProportionateShare Analysis....................................................................................................................................7 Calculation of Proportionate Share......................................................................................................................7 Impact Fee Cost per Development Unit....................................................................................................................8 CreditsOwed to Development..................................................................................................................................8 GrantFunding.......................................................................................................................................................8 Developer Dedications and Exactions...................................................................................................................8 DeficiencyCredit...................................................................................................................................................8 Individual Impact Fee Assessment............................................................................................................................9 Appendix......................................................................................................................................................................10 ■■ No Elk No City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis SECTION I: INTRODUCTION TO THE PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS PROJECT OVERVIEW Chubbuck City (the City) has commissioned Zions Public Finance, Inc (Zions) to put together a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Impact Fee Analysis (IFA) prior to imposing parks development impact fees authorized by Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code, known as the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (Impact Fee Act). IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA Chubbuck is a city located in Bannock County, Idaho. It is immediately north of the City of Pocatello. At the 2010 census, the population was 13,922 and the 2016 population was estimated to be 14,644. The purpose of the Parks & Recreation Capital Improvement Plan is to provide Chubbuck with substantive planning for future capital infrastructure for which development impact fees may be used as a funding source including facility sizes, costs, funding, and allocation to growth. This information will be used as the basis of calculating the Parks & Recreation IFA. A CIP must be prepared before the City can adopt and assess a parks impact fee. This CIP and IFA have been prepared for a single, city-wide service area (Service Area). The same parks & recreation impact fee cost per capita will be assessed throughout the Service Area. The cost per capita is the relationship between the Service Area's population and park acreage, amenities, and improvement costs. The cost per capita will be discussed further in Section III: Parks Impact Fee Analysis. POPULATION GROWTH 2016 is the baseline year for population estimate used in this analysis as shown in Figure 1. By buildout the City anticipates have a resident population of approximately 40,238. FIGURE 1: POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS Year Population Annual Population Change Estimated Households Annual Households Change 2016 14,644 5,249 2017 15,072 428 5,402 154 2018 15,501 428 5,556 154 2019 15,929 428 5,709 154 2020 16,358 428 5,863 154 2021 1 16,786 428 6,017 154 2022 17,215 428 6,170 154 2023 17,643 428 6,324 154 2024 18,072 428 6,477 154 2025 18,500 428 6,631 154 2026 18,929 1 428 1 6,785 154 2027 19,357 428 6,938 154 Buildout 40,238 14,422 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD (PPH) Persons per household estimates are important for the parks impact fee calculation because the impact fee is calculated as a cost per capita and then applied to each type of residential development using the persons per household values shown below. FIGURE 2: PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES Development 111116 Single Family (2015 ACS) 2.79 Multi -Family (2015 ACS) 2.60 go 1111L ■ n ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ©© SERVICE UNITS A service unit is defined by the Impact Fees Act as a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital improvements. In the case of parks impact fees, parks cost per capita is the basic unit for measuring the demand for services for each land use. The impact fee is calculated based on the "cost per capita" and applied to each land use category according to the historic persons per household. Parks impact fees are assessed to residential land uses only. ■■ ON WIN SIX No No WIN '.7 so Ul El_ No MM 71 A ff ME ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ©© SECTION II: PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS The Impact Fee Act allows that an impact fee be collected for the cost to construct system improvements which have capacity to serve future growth. A system improvement is defined as an improvement which will provide service to a service area not an improvement than only serves one specific development. The system improvement must also have a useful life of ten or more years. System improvements which are impact fee eligible may be "buy -in" to the City's existing inventory of amenities and park acreage or may be future improvements within a twenty-year planning horizon. The impact fee should be calculated to assess an impact fee for the proportionate share of system improvement costs which is available to serve future growth. The Parks CIP documents the City's impact fee qualifying existing and future expenditures. Qualifying system level improvements include neighborhood or community parks, public trails, open space, recreation centers, sports fields, and special use parks (such as fitness parks and skate parks). EXISTING PARK ACREAGE AND AMENITIES EXISTING PARK ACREAGE INVENTORY Figure 3 shows the City's existing parks acreage inventory listing each park location, the type of park, funding source, the year it was purchased/developed, and the cost of the parkland. Only community or neighborhood parks were ■oconsidered system improvements and thus impact fee qualifying. Any land that was donated was excluded from the No total qualifying acreage and parkland cost. ■■ so ME ■ ■ IL IL M■ on FIGURE 3: EXISTING PARK ACREAGE INVENTORY Park Name Type of Park Acres Funding Community Parks Year Purchased Current Cost QualifyingTotal Capell Park I Community 1 17.51 Grants or funding 1 1996 $ 2,734,157 Yes Cotant Park Community 1 21.11 Cash In Lieu of Park 1 1967 3,209,279 Yes Park Meadows Park Community 18.21 City Funded 1 2002 1 916,727 1 Yes Stuart Park Neighborhood/Community 1 4.91 Cash In Lieu of Park 1 1958 279,001 Yes Neighborhood Parks Armstrong Park Neighborhood 1.6 Cash In Lieu of Park 1975 $ 26,645 Yes Bicentennial Park Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 1975 - No Bistline Park Neighborhood 1.2 Cash In Lieu of Park 1985 27,835 Yes Briarwood Park Neighborhood 1.5 Cash In Lieu of Park 1993 23,644 Yes Chase Park Neighborhood 0.8 Cash In Lieu of Park 1963 6,975 Yes Dalton Park Neighborhood 0.5 Cash In Lieu of Park 1997 2,138 Yes Espie Park Neighborhood 0.9 City Funded 1993 4,256 Yes Homestead Park Neighborhood 2.6 City Funded 2005 76,529 Yes Mary Harker Park Neighborhood 1.3 Cash In Lieu of Park 1975 17,127 Yes Heartland Park Neighborhood 2.2 City Funded 2004 53,445 Yes Heritage Park Neighborhood 2.7 Cash In Lieu of Park 1993 86,521 Yes Jerry Rowland Park Neighborhood 2.2 Cash In Lieu of Park 2003 52,438 Yes Larry Miller Park Neighborhood 2.3 Cash In Lieu of Park 2003 58,552 Yes Long Park Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 2013 - No Mary's Park Neighborhood 4.3 City Funded 1978 207,310 Yes Sample Park Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 2007 - No Sunset West Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 2006 - No Tree Valley Park Neighborhood 0.81 City Funded 2000 6,862 Yes Totalsi 1 76.51 1 $ 7,789,442 4 ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ©© EXISTING PARK AMENITIES Figure 4 shows the existing amenities and their cost. The City has invested over $3.3M in park amenities costs. Please see Appendix D for the detailed inventory of parks documenting where each amenity is located. FIGURE 4: EXISTING AMENITIES ■■ 04 ■■ ON SIR SIX No IMI ISI m■ LAND IMPROVEMENT COSTS Improvements Cost Total VALUE Gazebos, Pavillions, Bowery $ 384,588 Pavilion $ 20,000 7 $ 140,000 Memorial Gazebo 71,588 1 71,588 Small Pavilion with Picnic Tables 20,000 6 120,000 Bench 500 24 12,000 Covered Picnic Tables 2,000 4 8,000 Picnic Tables 1,000 33 33,000 Fields, Courts, Diamonds $ 674,000 Basketball Full Court $ 16,000 3 $ 48,000 Basketball Half Court 8,000 10 80,000 Tennis Courts 16,000 is 240,000 Ball field 30,000 10 300,000 Volleyball Court 2,000 3 6,000 Restrooms $ 150,000 Restroom building $ 50,000 3 $ 150,000 Other $ 2,119,624 Playground 50,000 19 950,000 Swing Set 12,000 16 192,000 Splash Pad 250,000 1 250,000 Concessions Stand 80,000 1 80,000 Horse Shoe Pits 3,262 2 6,524 Refrigerated Ice Skating Rink with Lights 100,000 1 100,000 Concrete Skating Rink 100,000 1 100,000 Paved parking area (per Stall) 1,200 278 333,600 Gravel Non -Paved Parking Area 1 2501 30 1 7,500 Storage Structure /Tennis Service Shop 1 100,0001 1 1 100,000 Total $ 3,328,212 In addition to the inventory of qualifying park acreage and amenities, an improvement cost has also been included. The City has determined that each park requires an average of $2.25 per square foot for improvement costs such as landscaping. SCHEDULE FOR IMPROVEMENTS The parks & recreation impact fees will be assessed according to historic dollars invested per capita and not be based on the cost of future improvements. However, Jackson Land Design, PC is currently in the final stages of completing the City of Chubbuck Parks Master Development Plan 2018 and has identified future park improvements the City intends to complete in the near future. The parks improvement planned within the immediate horizon are as follows: Espie Park Water Education Center: Preliminary Cost Estimate: $841,500 Water education will be the theme of this 5 -acre community park that abuts the existing Espie Park on its west and north sides. The park will capitalize on the newly constructed City water tank, and provide additional amenities and E� attractions designed to educate park users on how a municipal water system operates, and to demonstrate how ■b valuable water is in this high desert community. Additional amenities include a slide to link the top of the water tank with the patio below, a community garden, park benches strategically placed throughout the park, picnic pavilions and arbor shade structures, and restroom facilities. Chubbuck City Downtown Park: Preliminary Cost Estimate: $2,502,000 11L This park's classification will be that of a Community Park, and would consist of approximately ten (10) acres of area in the center of a new City Downtown. The park's function would be to provide a pleasing green space in the middle oil on ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis un of a new downtown area that would be bordered by a mixed use of restaurants, retail space, and large to medium commercial businesses. This new park would consist mainly of passive recreation elements such as open lawn areas with lots of large shade trees and decorative shrub and flower beds. Wide walking paths with strategically placed benches and picnic tables would line these paths. Miller Park Preliminary Cost Estimate: $3,075,750 Currently, this park is undeveloped farm land that abuts several developing and proposed single-family home neighborhoods. The park's size and gentle topography provides a blank canvas to create a park that will serve current and future residents of this developing area. Central to the park is a 2 -acre lake that will have ADA access around the entire perimeter. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game has indicated an interest in stocking this lake with a mixture of bass and bluegill fish to provide year-round fishing opportunities. Utilizing the fill material generated from lake excavation a gently sloped community amphitheater will be built and oriented to maximize views of the lake and park. Also, the remaining lake fill material will be used to slightly elevate the park's northeast corner to provide the elevated launch pad necessary for a proposed water slip & slide feature. The park would be looped by an 8' wide walking path. Along the looped path a series of exercise stations, park benches, and picnic tables would be placed. A 9 -hole frisbee golf course would be located mainly outside of the looped path around the park's perimeter. FUNDING CAPITAL FACILITIES HISTORIC FUNDING SOURCES ■■ Parks can be funded in a variety of ways including tax revenues, impact fees, grants, bonds, etc. Tax revenues— OR% property and sales—are the primary source of revenue for the City. The City has authority to collect a portion of the property and sales taxes within its boundaries. The revenues collected can cover the operational expenses, non- impact fee qualifying capital expenses, and other general needs of the parks department. mm BOND FUNDING ON The Impact Fee Advisory Committee has recommended that bond costs (such as cost of issuance and interest) not be included in the impact fee calculation until the time that future bonds have been approved by the voters. There are no outstanding bonds related to the parks improvements and no future bonds are currently proposed. If a bond is proposed and approved in the future by City residents, then the impact fees will be revised at that time to include MEany additional bond costs. ■■ IMPACT FEES Impact fees have become an ideal mechanism for funding growth -related infrastructure. It is recommended that impact fees be used to fund growth -related capital projects as they help to maintain an adequate level of service and prevent existing users from subsidizing the capital needs for new growth. SUMMARY OF TIME AND PRICE DIFFERENTIAL The Impact Fees Act allows for the inclusion of a time and price differential to ensure that the costs incurred at a later date are accurately calculated. To account for this, 2018 project cost estimates for future projects can be inflated at 3% annually to a future value cost based on the year of anticipated construction; however, the parks & recreation impact fees are based on the current level of investment per capita, not based on the costs of future park improvements. Therefore, it was not necessary to include an inflation component in the parks & recreation impact fee calculation. MIL EQUITY OF IMPACT FEES ■o The impact fee calculations are structured to fund 100% of the growth -related portion of system improvements as presented in the impact fee analysis. Even so, there may be years that impact fee revenues cannot cover the annual growth -related expenses. Other revenues will be used to make up any annual deficits given gaps in development or other factors. Any borrowed funds are to be repaid in their entirety through impact fees at the time that impact fee 16 funds become available. M16 on ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ®® ■■ ON SIR SIX No ME SECTION III: PARKS IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS IMPACT FEE OVERVIEW The impact fee for parks is calculated using growth projections, current populations and persons per household projections, and existing and future parks acreage and amenities costs which have been described in Sections I & II of this document. The final components necessary to complete the impact fee analysis include: level of service (LOS), proportionate share analysis, impact fee cost per capita, impact fee cost per development unit, and proposed credits to development. Each of those components are discussed in the following section. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE One key component of the impact fee calculation is the level of service. The level of service is the measure of the relationship between service capacity and service demand for public facilities. In the case of parks impact fees that means current park acreage per 1,000 residents coupled with the parks & recreation amenities dollars invested per 1,000 residents. If the City did not continue to invest in new or expanded parks & recreation projects which have capacity to serve new growth, then the current level of service of 5.22 acres per 1,000 residents and $227,275 invested in amenities per 1,000 residents will drop and the level of service would be reduced over time. It is the intention of the City of Chubbuck to maintain the current level of service by continuing to invest in future parks & recreation land and amenities. FIGURE 5: CURRENT PARKS & RECREATION LEVEL OF SERVICE Parks Impact Fee Qualifying Parks & Recreation LOS - Current Inventory Acres Qualifying Cost Acreage LOS Per 1,000 Community Neighborhood 51.69 $ 7,139,163 24.78 650,279 3.53 1.69 Park Total 76.45 $ 7,789,442 5.22 Amenities Total Cost of Existing Amenities Amenities LOS Per 1,000 Amenities - $ 3,328,212 $ 227,275 Amenities Total $ —3,328,212T$ 227,275 PROPORTIONATE SHARE ANALYSIS Nopart of this analysis, the Impact Fees Act requires that the calculated impact fee be roughly proportionate and ■■ reasonably related to the development activity. Ideally, implementing an impact fee to pay for needed infrastructure places a burden on future users that is equal to the burden that was borne in the past by existing users. To determine the fair share an impact fee payer should pay for parks & recreation system capacity, a proportionate share analysis was performed as described below. Ek ME CALCULATION OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE Figure 6 displays the proportionate share of the impact fee eligible costs for existing park acreage, amenities, improvements, and associated professional expenses. The total impact fee eligible costs are divided by the City's population to arrive at an impact fee per capita of $844.25. FIGURE 6: PROPORTIONATE SHARE CALCULATION/IMPACT FEE COST PER CAPITA Total Impact Fee Eligible Park Acres (76.5 acres @$20,000) Population Cost $ 1,529,538 Served 14,644 $ Capita 104.45 Amenities Cost 3,328,212 14,644 227.27 Improvement Costs ($2.25 per Sq Ft) 7,495,501 14,644 511.85 Professional Expenses 10,000 14,644 0.68 Total Park Impact Fee Per Capita $ 844.25 ■■ No NN ■E City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis IMPACT FEE COST PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT The land use plan provided by the City identified the persons per household for both single-family and multi -family residential units (see Appendix B). Parks & Recreation impact fees are assessed to residential land uses only. The parks & recreation impact fee per capita has been assigned to each residential land use according to the persons per household for that type of development as shown in Figure 7. FIGURE 7: RECOMMENDED PARKS & RECREATION IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT Impact Fee Calculation Fee Per Unit Average Household Size/Total Single Family Residential (SFR) Units 2.79 Gross Park Impact Fee per SFR Household $ 2,355 Average Household Size/Multi Family (MFR) Units 2.60 Gross Park Impact Fee per MFR Household $ 2,195 CREDITS OWED TO DEVELOPMENT Certain circumstances may result in the need to provide a credit to development. Impact fee credits are detailed below. GRANT FUNDING Any improvement donated to the City which the City has no obligation to repay is assumed to be donated to the City's residents through buildout. Therefore, if a capital facility is acquired through a grant or another source that does not require the City to pay for the project, then the value of that improvement would not be considered an impact fee qualifying cost. An impact fee should not be collected for a project or expense otherwise covered through a grant without an appropriate credit. If any grant funding is received for impact fee eligible expenses, then the impact fee will be reviewed at the time that the funding is received to account for any reduction in impact fee project costs. DEVELOPER DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS Developer exactions are not the same as grants (which should be credited from the impact fee). If a developer constructs a system improvement level park/amenity or donates land to the City for a system improvement park, MEthen the value of the dedication is credited against that particular developer's impact fee liability. If the situation No arises that a developer chooses to construct facilities in -lieu of impact fees, appropriate arrangements must be made through negotiation between the developer and the City on a case by case basis. An impact fee credit will be due to the developer and the dedication/exaction will be classified in the inventory as if it had been funded directly by the City through impact fees collected. If the value of the dedication/exaction is less than the development's impact fee liability, the developer will owe the balance of the liability to the City. If the value of the improvements dedicated is worth more than the development's impact fee liability, the City must reimburse the difference to the developer which can be done using impact fee revenues collected from other developments benefitting from the system improvement. DEFICIENCY CREDIT When the LOS calculation indicates there is an existing deficiency it is generally appropriate to include a deficiency credit in the impact fee calculation. The purpose of the deficiency credit is to avoid new growth from being required to fund their capacity through an impact fee and then also having to help pay to correct the deficiency for existing Eh residents and essentially be double charged for their system capacity. To prevent this double charge being assessed ■o to new growth, any appropriate deficiency credit is subtracted from the total impact fees owed to account for any deficiency projects paid for through other funding mechanisms which all City residents/businesses are required to pay (such as bonds, property tax revenue, or user rate revenue, when applicable to the project). The parks inventory does not have an existing deficiency; therefore, no deficiency credit is required at this time. 116 M16 a on ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ©© INDIVIDUAL IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT The Impact Fees Act states that the impact fee ordinance should include a process whereby the City shall allow a developer, upon request by the developer, to provide a written individual assessment of the proportionate share of development impact fees. The individual assessment process permits consideration of studies, data, and any other relevant information submitted by the developer to adjust the amount of the fee. For parks & recreation impact fees the variable that would be reviewed in the individual impact fee assessment would be the persons per household generated by the proposed development. Once the City and the developer have reviewed relevant information and determined the persons per household for the proposed development, then the City can calculate the individual impact fee assessment using the formula in Figure 8. FIGURE 8: INDIVIDUAL IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT FORMULA Multiply Number of Persons per Household bV Impact Fee per Capita $844.25 ■■ ON WIN SIX No No WIN .7 ■ ■ uJ ■ El_ ■ o NN 71 A AIR ■ ■ ■ ■ W ©© City of Chubbuck Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Analysis ®® ■■ =VR I OR APPENDIX 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 APPENDIX A: POPULATION PROJECTIONS/ GROWTH IN DEMANDS Chubbuck City Parks CIP and Impact Fee Analysis A B C D E F G H Growth Projections Persons per Household Year Population Annual Population Change Estimated Households Annual Households Change 2016 14,644 5,249 2017 15,072 428 5,402 154 2018 15,501 428 5,556 154 2019 15,929 428 5,709 154 2020 16,358 428 5,863 154 2021 16,786 428 6,017 154 2022 17,215 428 6,170 154 2023 17,643 428 6,324 154 2024 18,072 428 6,477 154 2025 18,500 428 6,631 154 2026 18,929 428 6,785 154 2027 19,357 428 6,938 154 Buildout 40,238 14,422 A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 APPENDIX B: FORECAST OF DEVELOPMENT UNITS Chubbuck City Parks CIP and Impact Fee Analysis A B C D E F G H I 1 TABLE B.1: Existing and Future Population, Residential Units, and Private Non Residential Floor Space 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ::source: City of Chubbuck GIS Analysi< A B C D E F G H I JIM111- =6j" 2016 Existing Development Future Development to be Added &xisting + Growth at BuildoutA Residential Units Population Current Persons per Household Total Units Population Units Population Buildout Persons per Household Total Units Single Family Multi -Family 10,117 4,527 2.79 2.60 3,622 1,739 27,800 12,438 9,964 4,784 37,905 16,960 2.79 2.60 13,586 6,523 Total 14,644 2.70 5,361 40,238 14,748 54,865 2.73 20,109 Private Non -Residential Units SF per Capita Estimated kSF SF per Capita Estimated kSF SF per capita Estimated kSF General Commercial Office Institutional 149.4 6.6 17.6 2,188 97 258 149.4 6.6 17.6 6,013 266 708 149.4 6.6 17.6 8,201 363 966 Total 174 2,543 6,987 174 9,530 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPENDIX C: EXISTING PARK ACREAGE Chubbuck City Parks CIP and Impact Fee Analysis A B C D G H L Existing Park Acreage Park Name Type of Park Total Acres Funding Community Parks Year Purchased Current Cost Qualifying Capell Park Community 17.5 Grants or funding 1996 $ 2,734,157 Yes Cotant Park Community 21.1 Cash In Lieu of Park 1967 3,209,279 Yes Park Meadows Park Community 8.2 City Funded 2002 916,727 Yes Stuart Park Neighborhood/Community 1 4.91 Cash In Lieu of Park 1 1958 1 279,001 1 Yes Neighborhood Parks Armstrong Park Neighborhood 1.6 Cash In Lieu of Park 1975 $ 26,645 Yes Bicentennial Park Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 1975 - No Bistline Park Neighborhood 1.2 Cash In Lieu of Park 1985 27,835 Yes Briarwood Park Neighborhood 1.5 Cash In Lieu of Park 1993 23,644 Yes Chase Park Neighborhood 0.8 Cash In Lieu of Park 1963 6,975 Yes Dalton Park Neighborhood 0.5 Cash In Lieu of Park 1997 2,138 Yes Espie Park Neighborhood 0.9 City Funded 1993 4,256 Yes Homestead Park Neighborhood 2.6 City Funded 2005 76,529 Yes Mary Harker Park Neighborhood 1.3 Cash In Lieu of Park 1975 17,127 Yes Heartland Park Neighborhood 2.2 City Funded 2004 53,445 Yes Heritage Park Neighborhood 2.7 Cash In Lieu of Park 1993 86,521 Yes Jerry Rowland Park Neighborhood 2.2 Cash In Lieu of Park 2003 52,438 Yes Larry Miller Park Neighborhood 2.3 Cash In Lieu of Park 2003 58,552 Yes Long Park Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 2013 - No Mary's Park Neighborhood 4.3 City Funded 1978 207,310 Yes Sample Park Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 2007 - No Sunset West Neighborhood 0.0 Land was donated 2006 - No Tree Valley Park Neighborhood 0.8 City Funded 2000 6,862 Yes Totals 76.5 $ 7,789,442 A B C D G H L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 APPENDIX D: EXISTING AMENITIES Chubbuck City Parks CIP and Impact Fee Analysis A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 F] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Y i1 i Y Y Y fB i Y Y 4 GJ d Y � a FO - _3 > c o- ? N i O •� O dA _ CA '0aJ -W G1 O J O O f4 to M to tw V Vf Ln MU w pC O co W ++ U i Q v m �i O Ln GJ H UX m LJ W Improvements a Gazebos, Pavillions, Bowery $ 384,588 Pavilion $ 20,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 $ 140,000 Memorial Gazebo 71,588 1 1 71,588 Small Pavilion with Picnic Tables 20,000 1 2 1 1 1 6 120,000 Bench 500 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 24 12,000 Covered Picnic Tables 2,000 4 1 1 1 4 8,000 Picnic Tables 1,000 4 8 3 4 4 4 4 2 33 33,000 Fields, Courts, Diamonds $ 674,000 Basketball Full Court $ 16,000 1 1 1 3 $ 48,000 Basketball Half Court 8,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 80,000 Tennis Courts 16,000 8 4 2 1 15 240,000 Ball field 30,000 3 6 1 10 300,000 Volleyball Court 2,000 1 1 1 3 6,000 Restrooms $ 150,000 Restroom building I $ 50,0001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 $ 150,000 Other $ 2,119,624 Playground 50,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 950,000 Swing Set 12,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 192,000 Splash Pad 250,000 1 1 250,000 Concessions Stand 80,000 1 1 80,000 Horse Shoe Pits 3,262 2 2 6,524 Refrigerated Ice Skating Rink with Lights 100,000 1 1 100,000 Concrete Skating Rink 100,000 1 1 100,000 Paved parking area (per Stall) 1,200 1 200 1 1 16 1 1 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 1 12 5 278 333,600 Gravel Non -Paved Parking Area 250 1 1 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 7,500 Storage Structure /Tennis Service Shop 100,0001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100,000 Total $ 3,328,212 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 F] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 APPENDIX E: CURRENT PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE Chubbuck City Parks CIP and Impact Fee Analysis 2016 Chubbuck City Population 14,644 A B C Current Park & Recreation Level of Service 0 Parks Impact Fee Qualifying Parks : Recreation LOS• Acres Qualifying Cost Acreage LOS Per 1,000 Community Neighborhood 51.69 24.78 $ 7,139,163 650,279 3.53 1.69 Park Total 76.48 $ 7,789,442 5.22 Amenities Total Cost of Existing Amenities Amenities LOS Per 1,000 Amenities - $ 3,328,212 $ 227,275 Amenities Total - $ 3,328,212 $ 227,275 A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 APPENDIX F: IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Chubbuck City Parks CIP and Impact Fee Analysis A B Calculation of Park Impact Fee Per Capita C 0 is Total Impact Fee Eligible Park Acres (76.5 acres @$20,000) Cost $ 1,529,538 Population Fee Served 14,644 $ Per Capita 104.45 Amenities Cost 3,328,212 14,644 227.27 Improvement Costs ($2.25 per Scl Ft) 7,495,501 14,644 511.85 Professional Expenses 10,000 14,644 0.68 Total Park Impact Fee Per Capita $ 844.25 Calculation of Park Impact Fees by Development Type Impact Fee Calculation Fee Per Unit Average Household Size/Total Single Family Residential (SFR) Units 2.79 Gross Park Impact Fee per SFR Household $ 2,355 Average Household Size/Multi Family (MFR) Units 2.60 Gross Park Impact Fee per MFR Household $ 2,195 Calculation of Non -Standard Park Impact Fees I Multiply Number of Persons per Household by Impact Fee per Capita $844.25 I A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17