HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 14 2021CHUBBUCK
1 0 H H 0
City of Chubbuck Land Use and Development Commission
Regular Meeting
September 14, 2021
6:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
290 East Linden, Chubbuck, ID 83202
MINUTES
Board Members Present: Chair Jason Mendenhall, Brady Smith, Came Holm, Mike Schwartz, and TJ
Budge. Staff Members Present: City Attorney Tom Holmes, Planning Manager Don Matson,
Development Services Manager Sean Harris, Planning and Development Director Devin Hillam,
and City Clerk Joey Bowers.
Mendenhall called the meeting to order at 6:OOpm.
Mendenhall asked if any commissioners had a conflict of interest with the items before the
board. Budge abstained from all 5 public hearings and Smith recused from general business
items 2 and 3.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: August 10, 2021.
Mendenhall entertained a motion to approve the minutes as emailed. Schwartz moved to accept
the meeting minutes of August 10, 2021 as emailed; Holm seconded. The full authority
approved.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. An application for a Change in Land Use District from Single Family Residential (R-1) to
Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 2.0 acres of land. Subject property is located on
the west side of Philbin Road north of Sawtooth Street in Chubbuck, Idaho. The
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map designates this area as Mixed Use. At the
meeting, the Commission will consider whether the proposal satisfies the approval
criteria in municipal code section 18.28.050.6. Type of Action: Recommendation.
Planning Manager Don Matson presented an application for a Change in Land Use
District from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 2
acres of land. Matson stated that this application had been reviewed by City Staff and
appears to meet the standards of Titles 16, 17 and 18 of City Code, and recommended
approval. The applicant is willing to sign a development agreement that would
automatically revert this property back to an (R-1) zone if any changes are made or the
applicant does not move forward with the proposed preliminary plat.
Stuart Ward, DIOPTRA, represented the applicant. Mr. Ward presented a 9 unit
subdivision, which will include eight twin homes and one single family residential. Mr.
Ward stated that the proposed development would meet the density standards for a
Limited Residential (R-2) zoning. But due to the size and shape of the parcel, and
easements on the property the applicant has requested for an (R-4) zone. Mr. Ward felt
like this application would clean up a blighted part of the community.
Schwartz asked about access for emergency services and sanitation services. Ward
stated that access for sanitation services and emergency services will be contained within
the property and will not need to be accessed off of Philbin road, but could be accessed
off of Philbin Road if necessary.
Smith asked how this application was different from previous applications. Ward
stated that in 2017 the applicant applied for General Commercial (C-1) zoning, but due to
not having a preliminary plat the Land Use Board denied that zone change.
Mendenhall asked about the height difference between the two story twin homes and
the surrounding single family homes. Ward originally stated that he thought these twin
homes would be about 35ft at its peak but after reviewing that information stated that
these twin homes would actually be 27ft at its peak.
Holm asked City Staff if there was any improvements planned for Philbin Road in the
near future. Matson stated that there is an open house scheduled for the end of September
to discuss installing a roundabout on the corner or Chubbuck Road and Philbin Road in
2022, which would be just north of this development.
Mendenhall declared the public hearing open for public comment.
Victor Loiselle at 10795 N. Philbin, was Opposed. Mr. Loiselle felt like a two story
building would not fit in with the surrounding single level residential homes. Mr. Loiselle
did not want to see anymore apartments being built off of Philbin Road, and would be in
favor of single family residential homes being built on this property.
Cheryl Loiselle at 10795 N. Philbin, was Opposed. Mrs. Loiselle was concerned about
the height difference between a two story twin home and the surrounding one level single
family residential homes. Mrs. Loiselle would be in favor of one level town homes, as
long as they are not rentals.
Roy Thompson at 1331 Sawtooth, was Opposed. Mr. Thompson felt like there needed
to be a secondary entrance in and out of the Grove Subdivision, and Philbin Road needed
to be a double painted line from the interstate to Chubbuck Road to stop people from
trying to pass.
Aubrey Naasz at 4636 Pahsimeroi, was Opposed. Mrs. Naasz was told that the City
would not allow two story buildings to be built in this area. Mrs. Naasz was concerned
about traffic in this area. Mrs. Naasz would be in favor of an 8-5 commercial
development on this property rather than two story twin homes. Mrs. Naasz also felt like
this development would have a negative impact on their property values.
Sean Jahla at 1470 Sawtooth, was Opposed. Mr. Jahla stated that his house was 25ft at
its peals, and was concerned about the height difference between a two story twin home
and the surrounding one level single family residential homes. Mr. Jahla asked what
division this property was originally plated under because the legal CCNR's for the
Grove Subdivisions Div. 1 and 2 would not allow for two story buildings to be built. In
the Grove Subdivision CCR 2.22 requires homes to be a minimum of 2,300 square feet
and have a triple car garage. Mr. Jahla was also concerned about the increase in traffic
and the negative impact on property values.
Smith asked if anybody in the audience had any data showing the negative impacts
that this type of development would have on property values.
Paul Harding at 4640 Pahsimeroi, was Opposed. Mr. Harding was concerned about
traffic and the negative impacts a two story development would have on the view from
his back deck. Mr. Harding felt like the traffic issues needed to be address and resolved
before allowing anymore development off of this section of Philbin Road.
Brady Goodrich at 4633 Pahsimeroi, was Opposed. Mr. Goodrich was concerned
about traffic, the height difference between a two story twin home and the surrounding
one level single family residential homes, and the negative impact on property values.
Daniel Elder at 1388 Sawtooth, was Opposed. Mr. Elder was concerned about traffic,
the height difference between a two story twin home and the surrounding one level single
family residential homes, and the negative impact on property values.
Due to no more public comment Mendenhall closed the public hearing.
Ward stated that these twin homes would have a single car garage and would be sold
as individual units. Mr. Ward also stated that this property was never platted as part of the
Grove Subdivision and therefore would not fall under the CCR.
Budge asked Mendenhall to read the names of those individuals that filled a petition in
opposition to this application. Those names where Gene Warren, Kasey Watson, Nathan
Palmer, Floyd Hitchcock, Leroy House, and Cheryl Loiselle.
Smith gave a brief history about this property, and was concerned that the applicant
was not available to answer all the concerns from the surrounding neighbors, and was
also concerned about traffic and did not feel like this application was in the best interest
for the community.
Schwartz asked City Staff about access. Hillam stated that this property would meet
the access guidelines which allows a single property an access off of an arterial road.
Ward stated that the plat shows an entrance on the north of the property and an exit on the
south of the property.
Mendenhall also did not feel like this application was in the best interest for the
community. Smith felt like this was an issues that was not going to go away, and the
Board had already denied a commercial application for this property.
Smith motioned to deny the application of a Change in Land Use District from Single Family
Residential (R-1) to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 2 acres of land, as presented, on the
basis that the application does not meet the policies as set forth in city code. Schwartz seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason Mendenhall, Yes; Brady Smith, Yes; Mike Schwartz,
Yes; TJ Budge, abstained; Motion carried.
2. An application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Land Use Designation Map, on
approximately 4.18 acres of land from Commercial and Mixed Use, to Mixed Use. Subject
property is located on the north side of Quinn Rd west of Ronald St in Chubbuck, Idaho.
At the meeting, the Commission will consider whether the proposal satisfies the approval
criteria in municipal code section 18.28.040.D. Type of Action: Recommendation.
Planning Manager Don Matson presented an application for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment on 4.18 acres of land from Commercial and Mixed Use to Mixed Use. Matson
stated that this application had been reviewed by City Staff and appears to meet the
standards of Titles 16, 17 and 18 of City Code, and recommended approval.
Joel Dixon, Knudsen Engineering, represented the applicant. Mr. Dixon stated that
the applicant is wanting to remedy this property so it has one zoning classification and
not be split between commercial and mixed use.
Mendenhall declared the public hearing open for public comment.
Kyle Ruud at 4020 Ronald, was Opposed. Mr. Ruud was representing the
neighborhood and was wanting to know how the applicant intended to use this property
Mendenhall informed Mr. Rudd that this item of business was not to change the
zoning but to update the City's comprehensive plan map. Mr. Rudd did not have any
concerns with updating the map.
Due to no more public comment Mendenhall closed the public hearing.
Schwartz motioned to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment on 4.18 acres of
land from Commercial and Mixed Use to Mixed Use as presented, to the City Council. Smith
seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Jason Mendenhall, Yes; Brady Smith, Yes; Mike Schwartz, Yes; Carrie Holm,
Yes; TJ Budge, abstained; Motion carried.
3. An application for a Change in Land Use District from Limited Residential (R-2) to Dense
Residential (R-4) on approximately 4.18 acres of land. Subject property is located on the
north side of Quinn Rd west of Ronald St in Chubbucl<, Idaho. The Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use map designates this area as Commercial and Mixed Use. At the meeting,
the Commission will consider whether the proposal satisfies the approval criteria in
municipal code section 18.28.050.13. Type of Action: Recommendation.
Planning Manager Don Matson presented an application for a Change in Land Use
District from Limited Residential (R-2) to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 4.18
acres of land. Matson stated that this application had been reviewed by City Staff and
appears to meet the standards of Titles 16, 17 and 18 of City Code, and recommended
approval.
Joel Dixon, Knudsen Engineering, represented the applicant. Mr. Dixon stated that
the applicant currently does not have any set plans for this property, but this zone change
will allow the applicant to start that process.
Smith felt like that from the application the applicant is most likely looking at a higher
density use for this property. Mr. Dixon agreed that would be the route that the applicant
would most likely intends to use this property for, but currently does not have any set
plans for this property.
Mendenhall declared the public hearing open for public comment.
Kyle Ruud at 4020 Ronald, was Neutral. Mr. Ruud was concerned about the increase
in traffic, and not having sidewalks for pedestrian safety along Quinn Rd. Mr. Ruud
asked if there was any improvements planned for the Hawthorne Road and Quinn Road
intersection.
Kenneth Funk at 441 Chesapeake, was Opposed. Mr. Funk felt like the applicant was
trying to avoid not having a public hearing to put in apartments, and recommended not
changing the zone until a plan was in place for the surrounding neighbors.
Heather Quinton at 4019 Ronald, was Opposed. Mrs. Quinton was concerned about
the increase in traffic, and pedestrian safety.
Due to no more public comment Mendenhall closed the public hearing.
Holm asked which City was responsible for Quinn Road. Matson stated that most
borderline roads are split in the middle between the cities, but Quinn Road is a City of
Pocatello Road. The City of Chubbuck starts at the property lines along Quinn Road.
Smith asked about planned improvements at the Hawthorne Road and Quinn Road
intersection. Hillam stated that there is no set schedule for any improvements at that
intersection. The City of Pocatello and Bannock Transportation is currently looking for
funding to install a four way light at that intersection in 2022. Hillam also stated that this
property will be required to install sidewalks along Quinn Road as it develops.
Smith motioned to recommend approval of a Change in Land Use District from Limited Residential
(R-2) to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 4.18 acres of land, as presented to the City
Council. Schwartz seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Brady Smith, Yes; Mike Schwartz, Yes; Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason Mendenhall,
Yes; TJ Budge, abstained; Motion carried.
Smith also motioned to recommend approval of a Change in Land Use District from Limited
Residential (R-2) to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 4.18 acres of land, conditional upon
the City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Schwartz seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Mike Schwartz, Yes; Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason Mendenhall, Yes; Brady Smith,
Yes; TJ Budge, abstained; Motion carried.
4. An application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Land Use Designation Map on
approximately 21 acres of land from Commercial and Employment to Commercial, and on
approximately 18 acres from Commercial and Employment to High Density Residential.
Subject property is generally located on the east side of Yellowstone Avenue between
Adams Street and New Day Parkway in Chubbuck, Idaho. At the meeting, the Commission
will consider whether the proposal satisfies the approval criteria in municipal code section
18.28.040.D. Type of Action: Recommendation.
Planning Manager Don Matson presented an application for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment on 21 acres of land from Commercial and Employment to Commercial, and on
18 acres of land from Commercial and Employment to High Density Residential. Matson
stated that this application had been reviewed by City Staff and appears to meet the
standards of Titles 16, 17 and 18 of City Code, and recommended approval.
Joel Dixon, Knudsen Engineering, represented the applicant. Mr. Dixon stated that
the applicant feels like these changes will better fit within the surrounding areas and
allow for a more gradual transition from residential to high density residential, and then
to commercial. The current comprehensive plan designates this area as Industrial which
would allow 70ft buildings to be built in this area. Mr. Dixon feels like this change would
be in the best interest for the community.
Smith asked what the zoning was for the Diamond Court Apartments just south of this
property. Matson stated that the Diamond Courts Apartments where developed as Dense
Residential (R-4) zoning.
Mendenhall declared the public hearing open for public comment.
Anne Butler at 375 Roanoke, was Opposed. Ms. Butler was opposed to the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment map, because of the proposed zoning.
Kenneth Funic at 441 Chesapeake, was Opposed. Mr. Funk was opposed to the high
density zoning and the increase of traffic onto New Day Parkway. Mr. Funk asked about
planned improvements to expand New Day Parkway to Yellowstone Ave. Mr. Funk was
also concerned about the negative impact high density housing would have on
overcrowding the schools. Mr. Funk asked if a park would be required to be built in this
area, and wanted a two story building restriction to be placed on this property.
Due to no more public comment Mendenhall closed the public hearing.
Mendenhall asked for an update on improvements to New Day Parkway. Hillam stated
that due to scheduling conflicts with the railroad the expansion of New Day Parkway
from Whitaker Road to Industry way had been postponed until 2022. Idaho
Transportation Department (ITD) will be expanding Yellowstone Ave and as part of that
expansion will also widen New Day Parkway the rest of the way to Yellowstone Ave. in
2023.
Mr. Hillam stated that the School District receives notification and are given an
opportunity to express any concerns that might have a negative impact on the schools.
The City had not received any concerns from the school district on any of the
applications on the Boards agenda this evening. Mr. Hillam also stated that the developer
has the option to build a park that in turn will give him credits towards a parks impact
fee, or the applicant can choose to just pay a parks impact fee that will go towards
building larger destination parks for the community as a whole.
Smith asked about the current employment designation and how that differed from
when Diamond Court was developed. Hillam stated that the City was following State
Law more than it had in the past that is why this amendment was before the Board this
evening. Matson stated after talking to Development Services Manager Sean Harris that
Diamond Court was developed under Dense Residential (R-4) zoning. When the
comprehensive plan map was adopted that designated this area as Employment/ Industrial it
was a common practice among cities to make that designation along railroad tracks as a
buffer.
Smith asked about industrial developments. Hillam stated that industrial developers are
looking for land that is not adjacent to residential developments, so cities are now moving
more towards high density developments as a buffer along existing railroad tracks.
Smith motioned to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment on 21 acres of land
from Commercial and Employment to Commercial, and on 18 acres of land from Commercial and
Employment to High Density Residential. as presented, to the City Council. Schvbartz seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason Mendenhall, Yes; Brady Smith, Yes; Mike Schwartz,
Yes; TJ Budge, abstained; Motion carried.
5. An application for Initial Zoning District designation as Commercial General (C-2) on
approximately 21.07 acres of land, and Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 18.43 acres
of land. Subject property is currently in the Bannock County Multiple Use Zone and is
located on the east side of Yellowstone Avenue between Adams Street and New Day
Parkway in Chubbuck, Idaho. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map designates this
area as Commercial and Employment. At the meeting, the Commission will consider
whether the proposal satisfies the approval criteria in municipal code section
18.28.050.8. Type of Action: Recommendation.
Planning Manager Don Matson presented an application for an initial Zoning District
as Commercial (C-2) on 21.07 acres of land, and to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately
18.43 acres of land. Matson stated that this application had been reviewed by City Staff
and appears to meet the standards of Titles 16, 17 and 18 of City Code, and
recommended approval. This property had submitted an application for annexation that
will go before the City Council in October.
Joel Dixon, I{nudsen Engineering, represented the applicant. Mr. Dixon stated that
the applicant feels like these changes will better fit within the surrounding areas and
allow for a more gradual transition from residential to high density residential, and then
to commercial. Mr. Dixon feels like this change would be in the best interest for the
community. Mr. Dixon also stated that the applicant would like to eventually bring
Industry Way South from New Day Parkway and connect to the northern border of this
property as commercial development.
Mendenhall declared the public hearing open for public comment.
Anne Butler at 375 Roanoke, was Opposed. Ms. Butler was opposed to the proposed
zoning, and requested that the 300' (C-2) zoning be denied and instead be zoned (R-1) or (R-
2) along the eastern border of this property. Ms. Butler also requested that a proper privacy
screening be required along the eastern boarder of the property, 611 privacy fence, as well as a
100' buffer with trees planted every 30', and a maximum 2 -story height restriction. Ms. Butler
was also opposed to the high density (R-4) zoning as majority of the surrounding area was
zoned (R-1) and (R-2), and requested that the proposed (R-4) zone be denied and instead be
zoned (R-1) or (R-2) along the eastern border of this property; and a proper privacy screening
be required along the eastern boarder of the property, 6ft privacy fence, as well as a 100'
buffer with trees planted every 30', and a maximum 2 -story height restriction. Ms. Butler was
also concerned about the negative impact on property values, increase in traffic, and
overcrowding of schools.
Kenneth Funk at 441 Chesapeake, was Opposed. Mr. Funk seconded everything that
was presented by Ms. Butler.
Due to no more public comment Mendenhall closed the public hearing.
Dixon stated that the (R-4) zoning gives the applicant more options to develop this
area in the best interest for the community. The applicant is financially unable to commit
to all the requests that have been presented by Ms. Butler.
Smith asked if the applicant was open to buffering options along the eastern border
Dixon stated that the applicant is looking at all his options including the possibility of
developing a park along the eastern border.
Mendenhall asked how much of an impact would it have on the developer to develop
the entire eastern border as High Density (R-4) zoning along the railroad tracks and moving
the commercial boundary to the west. Dixon stated that the applicant does not own all the land
to the north that would make a connection to New Day Parkway and would like to work with
the owner to the north to allow for more commercial development along New Day Parkway
and the norther border of this property.
Smith asked if the board would be interested in placing some sort of buffering
restriction as a recommendation to the City Council.
Attorney Tom Holmes stated that the Board legally should not place or recommend
any type of restrictions at the zoning stage that would fall under the current City
Ordinances at the preliminary plat.
Schwartz asked if the tracks and the railroad right of way was used to calculate
buffering between developments. Matson stated that the railroad right of way/easement is
a clearly defined undeveloped property that can be used in buffering calculations for
developers, and would be addressed during a preliminary plat.
Smith wanted it know for the record that he would be interested in the future seeing
some sort of buffering along the eastern border of this property.
Budge wanted to make sure that those in the audience understood that although the
Board does have the ability to control the density on the initial zoning application. The
Board does not have the authority to impose any sort of height or buffering restrictions at
this stage of the application as requested during the public hearing.
Mendenhall recommended zoning the entire eastern boarder as (R-4) and moving the
commercial zoning to the west. Hillam stated that City Staff would be supportive of that
change. Attorney Holmes asked the applicant if they would be ok with the proposed
recommended change and if they would prefer for the board to table a recommendation
until they could provide an updated legal description.
Dixon preferred to not have the Board table a decision but to recommend approval of
the application as presented.
Matson reminded Mendenhall that the Board just recommend approval of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment on 21 acres of land from Commercial and Employment to
Commercial, and on 18 acres of land from Commercial and Employment to High Density
Residential. Which would not allow for that portion of the property to be developed as High
Density (R-4) zoning without a conditional use permit. The applicant could in the fixture apply
for a conditional use permit and develop that portion of this property as High Density (R-4)
zoning in the fixture, or it could be developed as commercial depending on the market if
approved by the City Council.
Mendenhall stated that he would recommend leaving that decision up to the City Council
as they also look at the annexation application for this property.
Smith motioned to recommend approval for an initial Zoning District as Commercial (C-2) on
21.07 acres of land, and to Dense Residential (R-4) on approximately 18.43 acres of land, conditional
upon the City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and annexation of this
property. Schwartz seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Jason Mendenhall, Yes; Brady Smith, Yes; Mike Schwartz, Yes; Carrie Holm,
Yes; TJ Budge, abstained; Motion carried.
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. Review and Possible Approval of Arbor Court Preliminary Plat.
(Commission will discuss the application and if it meets City code).
Applicant Daren Crockett presented an 11 lot preliminary plat and also wanted to
address concerns from the sanitation and fire departments. The sanitation department
stated that "The Sanitation Department had reviewed the applicant's proposal for
compliance. The turning radius does not accommodate Chubbuck garbage service
vehicles without using multiple point turns and backing. Sanitation believes they can
service the site with their trucks and a very careful driver." The Fire Department stated
that The Fire Department had reviewed the applicant's proposal for compliance. The
turning radius does not accommodate Chubbuck Fire Department vehicles without using
multiple point turns and backing. With the current layout, the Fire Department only has
one fire truck that could make the turn. All other tricks will have to make multiple point
turns to make the corner." Mr. Crocket presented multiple examples similar to his
application around Chubbuck that both the sanitation department and fire department
currently services.
Mendenhall asked City Staff for clarification. Harris stated that although the sanitation
and fire departments provided a few concerns during design review, both departments
had stated that they would be able to service this development as presented. The applicant
has provided additional space in this development to allow for the sanitation, and fire
departments to more easily service this development.
Budge asked if the parking lot would be one way traffic. Mr. Crockett stated the
parking lot was designed for one way traffic. Budge also asked about fencing and
creating a buffer for future developments. Mr. Crockett stated he would be providing a
6ft privacy fence along the western border and a 3ft fence along Chubbuck Road.
Budge motioned to recommend approval of the Arbor Court Preliminary Plat, as presented to
City Council; with a recommendation that the City Council to be made aware of the Staff Report
that was presented to the Land Use Commission, about the concerns from the sanitation and fire
departments during design review. Holm seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: TJ Budge, Yes; Brady Smith, Yes; Mike Schwartz, Yes; Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason
Mendenhall, Yes; Motion carried.
Review and Possible Approval of Copperfield Estates Div. 6 Preliminary Plat.
(Commission will discuss the application and if it meets City code).
Brent Monet represented Summit Building Group. Mr. Monet presented a 55 lot
preliminary plat. Mr. Monet also stated that they had met with the surrounding neighbors
and was able to address most of their concerns. Summit Building Group is also working
with City Staff to help create the envisioned park around the City's well site as part of
this development.
Development Manager Sean Harris stated that this application had been reviewed by
City Staff and appears to meet the standards of Titles 16, 17 and 18 of City Code, and
recommended approval. Mr. Harris also stated that the Public Works Director had
reviewed this application against the previously approved PUD by Mr. Darris Ellis, and
felt like this application complied with the guidelines of the PUD and also recommended
approval.
Budge asked about guest parking. Mr. Monet stated that there would be guest parking
provided on site and that there would be street parking available.
Schwartz motioned to recommend approval of the Copperfield Estates Div. 6 Preliminary Plat, as
presented to City Council. Budge seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason Mendenhall, Yes; TJ Budge, Yes; Mike Schwartz, Yes;
Brady Smith, recused; Motion carried.
3. Adoption of Resolution 2021-01 Harvest Springs Urban Renewal Plan. In compliance
with the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code, as
amended and the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code, as
amended, the Urban Renewal Plan for the Harvest Springs Urban Renewal Plan, adopted
by the Chubbuck Development Authority on September 7, 2021, will be presented to the
Commission for review and recommendations as to the plan's conformity with the City
of Chubbuck's Comprehensive Plan.
Executive Director Devin Hillam represented the Chubbuck Development Authority.
Mr. Hillam presented an urban renewal plan for the Harvest Springs development that was
adopted by the Chubbuck Development Authority. Mr. Hillam stated that before the City
Council could review/adopt this plan it needed to be brought before the Land Use
Commission for review and determination as to its conformity with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Mendenhall motioned to adopt Resolution 202 1 -01 as presented, Schwartz, seconded.
With all commission members understanding the motion they voted.
Roll Call Vote: Mike Schwartz, Yes; Carrie Holm, Yes; Jason Mendenhall, Yes; TJ Budge, Yes;
Brady Smith, recused; Motion carried.
Mendenhall entertained a motion to adjourn; Schwartz made the motion. Smith seconded. All
voted to adjourn at 9:38pm.
-�� Oxe.,v
son Mendenhall, Chairperson
J?,�,o s, City Clerk
This meeting was available to the public electronically and by phone.
Via Zoom Teleconferencing: Meeting ID: 843 5519 0788