HomeMy WebLinkAbout0730 Pretreatment RegulationsCITY OF CHUBBUCK, IDAHO
ORDINANCE NO. 1,� 0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHUBBUCK, IDAHO, AMENDING PORTIONS
OF CHAPTER 13.20, "PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS" TO CONFORM WITH
THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF POCATELLO ORDINANCE WHICH WAS
AMENDED TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT;
REPEALING PRIOR CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE
SEVERABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT
ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 13.20 NOT AMENDED SHALL REMAIN IN
EFFECT; AND PROVIDING WHEN THIS ORDINANCE IS EFFECTIVE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHUBBUCK, IDAHO:
Section 1. Intent. The City of Chubbuck is subject to the terms of the National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System Permit issued to the City of Pocatello for is Waste Water
Treatment Facility and adopts identical provisions of its Pretreatment Regulations to comply with
said Permit. Pocatello recently adopted changes to its Pretreatment REGULATIONS and this
Ordinance will bring Chubbuck's regualtions into conformity.
Section 2. Revisions. The following amendments to Section 13.20.020 and 13.20.045
are hereby adopted:
13.20.020: DEFINITIONS: Unless a provision explicitly states otherwise, the following
terms and phrases, as used in this ordinance, shall have the meanings hereinafter designated:
MAXIMUM The maximum concentration (or loading) of a pollutant allowed to be
ALLOWABLE discharged at any time, determined from the analysis of any discrete or
DISCHARGE composite sample collected, independent of the industrial flow rate and
LIMIT: the duration of the sampling event.
MAXIMUM The total mass of a pollutant that all Industrial Users (or a sub rroou of
ALLOWABLE Industrial Users as identified by the City) may discharge pursuant to the
INDUSTRIAL local limits developed under 40 CFR Section 403.50).
LOADING (MAIL):
MAXIMUM The maximum loading of a pollutant that can be received at the POTW'
ALLOWABLE headworks without causing Pass Through, Interference, interfere with
HEADWORKS beneficial reuse of sludge, or cause an adverse effect on worker health
POLLUTANT OF AU pollutant that is present in concentrations or mass that may reasonably_
CONCERN (POC): be expected to cause Pass Through Interference or impact another
Environmental Standard evaluated in the development of local limits
MEDICAL Isolation wastes, infectious agents, human blood and blood products,
WASTES: pathological wastes, sharps, body parts, contaminated bedding, surgical
wastes, potentially contaminated laboratory wastes, and dialysis wastes.
Ordinance - Page 1
chubbuck 012014 ord pre-treatmentmiod
SIGNIFICANT Except as provided in paragraph C of this part. Aa significant industrial
INDUSTRIAL user is:
USER:
A. A user subject to categorical pretreatment standards; or
B. A user that:
1. Discharges an average of twenty five thousand (25,000) GPD or
more of process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary,
noncontact cooling, and boiler blowdown wastewater);
2. Contributes a process wastestream which makes up five percent
(5%) or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the POTW treatment plant; or
3. Is designated as such by the city on the basis that it has a
reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation
or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement.
4-.C. Upon a finding that a user meeting the criteria in this subsection B
of this part has no reasonable potential for adversely affecting the
POTW's operation or for violating any applicable pretreatment
standard or requirement, the city may at any time, on its own
initiative or in response to a petition received from a user and in
accordance with procedures in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(6), determine that
such user should not be considered a significant industrial user.
13.20.045: LOCAL LIMITS:
A. i•_____`s Enumerated. The following pollutant limits are established to protect against
Ppass Tthrough and Iinterference. No persoi Significant Industrial User shall discharge
wastewater containing pollutant levels in excess of the following daily maximum allowable
discharge limits.
Pollutant
Daily Maximum
(mg/IL)Iallbl
Arsenic
0.056
Cadmium
0.028
Chromium*otafj
3.2279
Copper
0.515
eymfide
32-.0
0.1953
Fluoride
Lead
Mercury
0.00067
Molybdenum
0.12
Nickel
0.426
Selenium
0.107
Silver
0.62
Zinc
1.287
Oil and grease (animal and vegetable based) 350
Ordinance - Page 2
chubbuck 012014 ord pre-treatment.wpd
U
Oil and grease (petroleum based) 100:6
9FT-E) (Total Toxic Organics) 2.H
pH minimum (LU.) 6.09
pH maximum La.U.J 10.00
incorporated by reference.
:a
1�1�11111�1/11�1QR.7�1�1r111.1.XPi.JI�A/I1T7�711�1�J.1►�1��IIf�i.�.lY\�IA�Iaa�11NIG��J�/la�Ll.1�J Ila.J1A71�.�
&R. The above limits apply at the point where the wastewater is discharged to
the POTW (end of pipe) pretreatment an&or prior to mixing -with dilution flows. Ali
The
superintendent may impose mass limitations in addition to (or in place of) the concentration -
based limitations above. Where a user is subject to a Ccategorical !!pretreatment Sstandard and a
local limit for a given pollutant, the more stringent limit of applicable Ppretreatment Sstandard
shall apply.
to the POTW that exceeds the following limits, as applicable.
Pollutant
Daily Maximum
Limit (mg/L)
Benzene (a) 0.050
BTEX (b) 0.750
i-alAll pollutants shown in the Table are total.
Lb BTEX shall be measured as the sum of Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene and
Xylenes.
Ordinance - Page 3
chubbuck 012014 ord pre-treatment.wpd
u
- 1 grit -11 &-if - - - :r i i . - - - - - - - - i . - - - - yi��i.�7�.ui..n���rer�Rinunt-ft jr9num*i
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Section 1. Reveal of Conflicting Ordinances. The provisions of any Ordinance of the
City and any provision of the Municipal Code which are in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict. All other sections of Chapter 13.20 not
herein amended shall remain in effect.
Section 2. Severability. The sections of this ordinance are severable. The invalidity of a
section shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections.
Section 3. Effective Date. The rule requiring an ordinance to be read on three separate
days, one of which shall be a reading in full, is dispensed with, and this Ordinance shall become
effective upon its passage, approval and publication.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
CHUBBUCK, IDAHO, this day of Cb ere,. -�, , 2014
Kevin B. England, 111or
ATTEST:
izA ctw -d 1u"�, X22
Richard Morgan, City -Clerk
Ordinance - Page 4
chubbuck 012014 ord pre-treatment.wpd
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. '730
An ordinance of the City of Chubbuck, a municipal corporation of the state of Idaho,
amending portions of chapter 13.20, "Pretreatment Regulations" to conform with the provisions
of the city of Pocatello ordinance which was amended to bring it into compliance with the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit providing for the repeal of
conflicting ordinances; providing that all other provisions of Chapter 13.20 not amended shall
remain in effect; providing for the severability of the provisions of this ordinance; providing
when this ordinance shall be in effect.
The full text of this ordinance is available at the City Clerk's Office, Chubbuck City
Offices, 5160 Yellowstone, Chubbuck, ID 83202.
I have reviewed the foregoing summary and believe it provides a true and correct
summary of Ordinance No. 7� O and that the summary provides adequate notice to the public
of the contents of this ordinance.
DATED this day of , 2014.
Thomas J. Holmes, City Attorney
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. _- Page 1
chubbuck 012014 ord sum pretrt.wpd
LAMONT JONES
JACK H. ROBISON
THOMAS J. HOLMES
Paul Andrus
City of Chubbuck
P O Box 5604
Chubbuck, ID 83202
Dear Paul:
LAW OFFICES
JONES, CHARTERED
203 SOUTH GARFIELD
P.O. BOX 967
POCATELLO, IDAHO 83204-0967
January 20, 2014
TELEPHONE: (208) 232-5911
FAX: (208) 232-5962
E-MAIL: tholmesid@gmail.com
MR. HOLMES' TELEPHONE EXTENSION: 103
Enclosed is an ordinance and a summary that conforms our Chapter 13.20 with those
changes Pocatello recently made to their pretreatment regulations.
If this is acceptable, please have Rich put it on the Council agenda for review and
adoption. Someone will need to be prepared to explain to the Council why we are doing this.
Since y,
Thomas J. Holmes
TJH/ah
chubb uck012204.13. wpd
Enclosure
cc Steve Smart
Rich Morgan