HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 17 1980 CMCOUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
June 17, 1980
109
Minutes of an adjourned council meeting of June 10, 1980, held June 17,1980,
in the city municipal building.
Present: Mayor Joun O. Cotant, Jr., Councilmembers Becky Hopkins, Dwain
Kinghorn, LeRoy Quick and Earl Romreill, City Engineer Steven Smart and
Secretary Dorothy Ward. Attorney Donald L. Burnett, Jr. attended the meeting
after 8:30 p.m.
Meeting called to order at 7:25 p.m. by Mayor Cotant.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: WHETHER THE CHUBBUCK LAND USE ORDINANCE, NO. 205 should
be amended in the following respects:
1. Whether the Ordinance should be further amended to provide controls
limiting the portion of a lot which may be covered with "Accessory Structures."
The council discussed the percentage of a lot which might be covered by
buildings and that if was not more feasable for the control to come by the
restrictive covenants rather than more control from the city.
Mayor Cotant said city has controls already, aesthetics should be concern of
council now.
WHETHER THE CHUBBUCK LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, NO. 206 should be amended in
the following respects:
1. Whether the ordinance should be amended to require a developer to
submit final design drawings of the proposed utilities-at the final plat
stage rather than the preliminary plat stage.
The council questioned Engineer Smart about the engineer's drawings being
required at the prliminary plat stage. He said it is an additional expense at
this stage of development, some times developers are trying to get an idea
as to how to develop without a lot of enQineering~re expense. He said' construction
drawings brought in with the final plat ] much more practical. He also
said construction drawings need to reflect such thins as they are asking for
waiversoRn, such as fire hyrants, curb,,~gutter etc., he also said that any
changes -preliminary plat change the construction drawings.
Engineer Smart reviewed the recommendations of the Land Use & Development
Commission with the council.
Couhcilman Romriell made motion to adopt proposed changes of Ordinance #206,
Section A, 6ith the recommendations of the Land Use & Land Development
Commission as follows:
E. Proposed Utility Methods
1. Sewage Disposal: Prliminary location and carrying capacity of all
lines or conduits and necessary aopurtenances.
2. Water Supply: Preliminary location and carrying capacity of all
lines or conduits and necessary appurtenances.
Section 2-6. add a new paragraph, page 13:
111
H. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED
Design
1. Sewage disposal: *D~t~ location_and carrying capacity of all
lines or conduits and appurtenances,*i~.~:~with a evidence that the
developer has furnished the State of Idaho, Division of Envionment, such
information as the Division may require regarding design and operation of
sanitary sewage facilities.
2. Water Supply: Design location and carrying capacity of all lines
or conduits and appurtenances, together with a letter from said Division
approving proposed w~ter volume and quantity.
3. Streets: DesiOn location of all streets including curb, gutter
and sidewalk and pavement.
4. Storm Water Design Disposal: Design calculations and layout of
disposal system and location of inlets.
5. Other Utilities: Layout of gas lines, electrical lines, televsion
cables, telephone lines and other utilities.
Councilwoman Hopkins seconded~the motion. The voting was unanimous in favor.
2. Whether the Ordinance should be further amended to make clear that
with respect to cash contributions in lieu of land dedicated by developers
for parks and recreation purposes the "fair market value" of the land shall
be computed to include the enhancement of value created by the remainder of the
development and to include the cost of improvements that would otherwise
be required under Section 3-3 (E) (5).
The council discussed the value of land in it's raw state and after a
subdivision was developed. Councilman Romriell asked if developed ground
would include curb, gutter, sidewalk and sewer and water stub-in.
A discussion followed on the following:
1. Raw land - value of land after development,
2. Capitol improvement-program for Industrial & Commercial improvements.
3. Cash in lieu should be option of council.
4. Swimming pool for city.
5. Impact area- can city ask for cash in lieu of park for recreational
program.
6. Shopping Centers contributing towards fire eeuipment.
7. Agreement with county on subdivi6ns outside city limits.
The consensus of the council was that developed ground includes curb, gutter,
sidewalR and the utilities stubbed in, Cash in lieu is Value level of which
cash is based on improved property not on raw land. It is the enhanced value
of the land - caused by the development - that city would want to consider.
Councilwom~n Hopkins made motion to recess public hearing at 9:00 p.~. Councilman
Kinghorn seconded motion. Voting was unanimous in favor.
Mayor Cotant called a special meeting,at 9:1g p.m., of the city council,
All council members were present. All council members waived a special
notice of meeting.
It was the consenus of the city council, Attorney Burnett draw an instrument
relating to a proposed real estate transaction with Clarance and Sherrie ~lelch
for the council and rtr. and Hrs. Welch to review.
Speci61 meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Recessed council meeting called to order at 10:00 p.m. by Hayor Cotant.
Councilman Kinghorn made motion to adjourn public hearing at 10:05 p.m.
Councilman Quick seconded the motion. All voted in favor.
The Mayor and Council discussed the following items:
Amending Ordinance #205:
Section 2. Child Care Centers
Section 3. Livestock
Section 5. Hobile Home Courts
Mobile Home One
Mobile Home Two
Sign Ordinance
Gordon Wilks discussed Chubbuck Days with Hayor and Council.
113
· Cotant, Jr~ Hayor
Dorothy L. l'~rd, Secretary