Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout009-5-06LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION September 5, 2006 Minutes of the Land Use and Development Commission held at Chubbuck City Office, 5160 Yellowstone; September 5, 2006. Present: Chairman Pete Anderson Commission Members: Rodney Burch, Jason Mendenhall, Mary Harker, Deloy Stuart, Shawna Elzner, Gayle Anderson; Attorney: Tom Holmes; City Staff: Steve Smart; and Secretary Myrna Crapo. Chairman Pete Anderson asked for approval of the minutes of the meeting of August 1, 2006; Jason Mendenhall moved to approve the minutes as mailed. Mary Harker seconded; all voted in favor. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. An application by The Adams Company, 475 N. 300 W. Suite 204, Kaysville, Utah for annexation and zoning Change to R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, C-1 and C-2 as indicated on the Master Plan. The property is located West of I-15, east of Hiline Road, north of Tree Valley and Bunce Subdivisions. David Adams, 475 N. 300 W. Kaysville, Utah representing the Adams company along with Troy Sanders of A.S.W.N. who made the presentation. Troy Sanders, A. S. W. N. 5151 S. 900 E. Salt Lake City, Utah; there are 406 acres in the proposed development. The proposed I-15 off ramp was taken into consideration in the design. A map was shown indicating the different zones proposed. They used the cities master plan in the design. They have considered the topography in the area. The commission asked: 1. If they had requested extending the Urban Service Boundary. 2. If we annex them into the city are we required to provide water and sewer - Steve Smart informed the commission that there would be some obligation from the city. 3. If the master plan would take in the 2 %2 mile area in the sewer plan. The meeting was opened for public comment: John Perkins, 5151 Tree Valley Road, One of their major concerns is that everything south of this property gets flooded out each year because they don't maintain the drainage on their property. They would like to see something in place to solve this problem. There is only 18 acres designated as R-1 and they would like to see the R-4 parcel go to R-1 . Ruth Johnson, 13562 West Tyhee Road, the Fort Hall Siphon on Siphon Road; if the road is to be widened who will pay for the new siphon. If Chubbuck provides more water for the area and the water tables goes down who will pay for our having to dig deeper wells in the Chubbuck/Tyhee Area Land Use and Development September 5, 2006 Page 2 Tanny Hensley, 11781 N. Buffalo Road, they live next to the proposed R-3 area and would like to see it less dense. They are concerned about the water table and their water rights. Will they be forced onto city services. They are concerned with the cost to them if it is annexed. Jeff Maynard, 11956 N. Hiline, what exactly will happen with the Hiline and Siphon road intersection. Are they planning on building a bridge. They are concerned with the sewer and water system. They have flooding where they live because of the drainage off of the hill. Don Lindsley, 804 Mark Drive, they live at end of Elizabeth, will his property be condemned for extending Mark Drive. He is concerned about the drainage behind his home and the flooding of their property. The R-4 that is east of R-1 is up to the 4-plex; he would like to have that R-1. Jeff Smith, 5159 Pleasant View, he is concerned with those previously mention, would there be an extension put on Mary and Elizabeth. What is the access going to be like into R-1. They are concerned with the increase traffic. The public hearing was closed. David Adams, the access will be up to city. Flooding is an engineering issues that would have to be solved. The commission asked: 1. Why R-4 was selected instead of R-2 or R-3. Mr. Adams said they would look at it and address it. 2. The property between Pleasant View and interstate under the comp plan is mixed use. 3. This would be a conditional situation. A recommendation to the city would be in concept only. 4. Their intention of giving the city their water rights. 5. The cities current ability to provide services. It is outside the urban service boundary and we are unable to provide services for this property. Jason Mendenhall has a huge concern for that. 6. No use in changing urban service boundary until we can supply service 7. If this can be a conditional zone change. 8. Until the Urban Service boundary is changed we are dead in the water. 9. A recommendation to the city council to deny the annexation and zoning change of this date and once the development agreement is signed and we have some questions answered reconsider it. The commission asked Mr. Adams what was his goal: Mr. Adams: their goal is to develop the property. They want to know if the community is interested in a project of this nature. Specifically: Would the city want them or would they be /1 better to go to the county. They are concerned with the sewer problem. Is it possible to provide an affirmative vote that we endorse this but only subject to an development agreement being developed. n Land Use and Development Commission September 5, 2006 Page 3 Jason Mendenhall moved to recommend to the City Council denial of the application by the Adams Company, 475 N. 300 W. Suite 204, Kaysville, Utah for annexation and zoning change to R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, C-1 and C-2 as indicated on the Master Plan. The property is located West of I-15, east of Hiline Road, north of Tree Valley and Bunce Subdivisions. Shawna Elzner 2°d Roll call vote: Rodney Burch, no; Jason Mendenhall, yes; Mary Harker, no; Deloy Stuart, no; Shawna Elzner, yes; Gayle Anderson, no; Pete Anderson, yes. Motion failed. Deloy Stuart moved to recommend to the City Council that they approval the application of the Adams Company for annexation and zoning change to R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, C-1 and C-2 as indicated on the master plan. Property is located West of I-15, east of Hiline Road, north of Tree Valley and Bunce Subdivision with the condition that they work out water and sewer feasibility before annexation or the zone change will take place. Mary Harker, seconded. The Land Use discussed the motion and Deloy Stuart made a change to his original motion: that this condition is based upon the urban service boundary be expanded at the time that we feel that we can offer those services,• and with the additional condition that if Siphon interchange does not end up going on Siphon road that this zone change and annexation would not take effect. And the deletion of the condition "that they work out water and sewer feasibility before annexation of the zone change will take place". Mary Harker approved the changes. Roll call vote: Rodney Burch, yes; Jason Mendenhall, no; Mary Harker, yes; Deloy Stuart, yes; Shawna Elzner, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes; Pete Anderson, yes. 2. An application by Samuel McNabb, (Sam Trust) and Margaret McNabb (M/MF Ltd Partnership) of 14053 W. Tyhee Road, Pocatello, Idaho for Annexation and zoning change to Agricultural (A). Property is located at southeast corner of West Chubbuck Road/Philbin road. Gerald McNabb 12973 N. Philbin Road they were asked by the city of chubbuck to let some of their land be annexed to help the development outside the city. They want it to remain as agricultural land. They have no plan to develop that property at this time. The meeting was opened for public comments. Darris Ellis, 4470 Wasatch, he like the idea; it will help everybody involved. The public hearing was closed. Jason Mendenhall moved to recommend to the city council approval of the application by Samuel NcNabb, (Sam Trust) and Margaret McNabb (M/MF Ltd Partnership) of 14053 W. Tyhee Road, Pocatello, Idaho for Annexation and zoning change to Agricultural (A). Property is located at southeast corner of West Chubbuck Road/Philbin Road. Mary Harker seconded. Roll call vote: Rodney Burch, yes; Jason Mendenhall, yes; Mary Harker, yes; Deloy Stuart, yes; Shawna Elzner, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes; Pete Anderson, yes. n Land Use and Development Commission September 5, 2006 Page 4 3. An application by School District #25/ Bart Reed, 3115 Poleline Road, Pocatello, Idaho for a Annexation and Zoning change to Agricultural (A). Property is located South of West Chubbuck Road, West of Park Meadows Subdivision on Independence Avenue, East of Philbin Road. Steve Smart: The school district has 14 % acres. It provides the additional link between Park Meadows Subdivision and others. We should zone it to a different designation other than Agricultural. We could zone it R-1. The meeting was opened for public comment. There was none, so the public hearing was closed and brought back to the commission. Mary Harker moved to recommend approval of the application by School District #25/ Bart Reed, 3115 Poleline Road, Pocatello, Idaho for a Annexation and Zoning change to R-1. Property is located South of West Chubbuck Road, West of Park Meadows Subdivision on Independence Avenue, East of Philbin Road. Gayle Anderson seconded. Roll call vote: Rodney Burch, yes; Jason Mendenhall, yes; Mary Harker, yes; Deloy Stuart, yes; Shawna Elzner, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes; Pete Anderson, yes. 4. An application by Dan Bull, 3408 West Portneuf Road, Pocatello, Idaho for a Preliminary Plat for Homestead Estates Division 2. Property located at end of Homestead Road. No one was at the meeting to represent Mr. Bull. Jason Mendenhall moved to table Item #4 until the next meeting or until we have a representative from the applicant. Deloy Stuart seconded. All voted in favor. 5. An application by the City of Chubbuck to repeal section 18.04.05 and adopting Chapter 18.06 definitions, including definition for Residential Rental Dwelling. The meeting was opened for public comment there were no public comment; so it was closed and brought back to the commission for a discussion. Jason Mendenhall moved to recommend to the city council approval of the application by the City of Chubbuck to repeal section 18.04.05 and adopting Chapter 18.06 definitions, including definition for Residential Rental Dwelling. Deloy Stuart. Seconded. Roll call vote: Rodney Burch, yes; Jason Mendenhall, yes; Mary Harker, yes; Deloy Stuart, yes; Shawna Elzner, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes; Pete Anderson, yes. W n Land Use and Development Commission September 5, 2006 Page 5 GENERAL BUSINESS: 6. Discussion of the proposed Grove Subdivision - provide comment to the Bannock County Planning and Development Council as to City of Chubbuck requirements. Kevin Booth they planned on being annexed to the city. They don't want to start the plot plan process over and want to stay with the county. Construction drawings are not complete. The commission discussed: 1. That they have to develop it to the city standards 2. That we recommend annexation to the city 3. The city will be reviewing construction drawings. 4. They are within the urban service boundary 5. This won't connect to Chubbuck Road as their property doesn't go that far. 6. They need a stub to eventually connect to other developments The commission recommended to the County are: 1. That they have to develop it to the city standards 2. That we recommend annexation to the city. 7. Discussion on a proposed ordinance adopting section 18.06.200 definition for residential rental dwelling; amending section 18.08.040, schedule of general controls as to Residential use. The commission discussed: 1. Avoiding public hearings if they get signature for 300 feet. Jason Mendenhall moved to take section 18.06.200 to public hearing next month. Mary Harker seconded. All voted in favor. The commission discussed moving November's meeting to Wednesday or Thursday because of the elections being held in the building. Meeting was changed to November 1, 2006 Jason Mendenhall moved to adjourned; with MaryI Cf r)sec�n24ng at 8:45 pm Pete Anderson, Chairman � �Secretary \ 4'-S CCV- L u O L.