Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout005 01 86LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES May 1, 1986 Minutes of the regular meeting of the Land Use and Development Commission held in the city municipal building May 1 1986. ' ' Present: Chairman Pete Anderson, Evan Byington, Bob Anderson, Ted Corrington, Dee Stalder and Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr, Public Works Director Steven Smart, Secretary Dorothy Ward. Bob Allen, Sue Parrish and Myrna Cain were excused. Meeting called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Anderson. Chairman Anderson asked for any additions or corrections to the minutes of April 3, 1986. There being none, Dee Stalder made motion to accept mintes as written. Evan Byington seconded motion, with all voting in favor. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: 1. A proposal by Hugh R. Hadley and Noel Christensen for a conditional use permit to construct Self-service Storage Facility-General Pub~and Commercial Storage at 4709 Yellowstone Avenue. Property is presently zoned General Commercial (C-2). Chairman Anderson asked for comment from Steven Smart. He said the proposed use not listed under Genral Controls in the Land Use Ordinance and therefor would fall under a conditional use permit. The land is vacant and is zoned commercial. Chairman Anderson said property is off Yellowstone Avenue, north of Linden Avenue, it is about 194 feet off from Yellowstone and access will be a 25 foot paved road. John Bush, 3221 Plateau Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, representing Mr. Hadley and Mr. Christensen as co-developers on property said they proposed to develop mini storage in this particular area, as it is non frontage property. He said it would add to overall standing of commercial area in developing as zoned. Mr. Bush said they would have security fencing and lighting at night. He said units would be operated basically in day light hours for storage. He said there would be no traffic problem to the surrounding area, there would be about 292 units, which would be an appropriate type of use of this property; for the value of the property. Bob Anderson ask~ if they would be developing units in phases. Mr. Bush said they would be built all at once, they would be built of cinder block with metal roof and the interior would be of metal. Mr. Bush said they would utilize 6foot chain link fencing south of the easement and lower east side will be slatted off with PUBLIC HEARING - H. HADLEY & N. CHRISTENSEN - continued with redwood slats, the lighting will be mercury vapor lights on the buildings. Ted Corrington asked if the storage would be all inside storage. Mr. Bush said there would be no outside storage. Chairman Anderson opened public hearing for public comment. being none, public hearing closed. There Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr. made motion to grant a conditional use permit to Hugh R. Hadley and Noel Christensen, to construct Self-service Storage Facility - Ge~l Public and Commercial Storage at 4709 Yellowstone Avenue. Dee Stalder seconded the motion. Roll call vote, Stalder, yes; Cotant, yes; Byington, yes; Corrington, yes; Anderson, yes; Anderson, yes. 2. A Proposal by Rickie and Kathleen Kirkham for a conditional use permit to build a double car garage, onto their home, with a room above. The room would be used for a business, Kirkham Dance Academy, a dance school. Property is presently zoned General Residential (R-2). Chairman Anderson asked for comment from Steven Smart; he explained a Dance Acadamy not allowed under ordinance in a residential zone, this item would have to be considered as a home occupation. Chairman Anderson read criteria for home occupations. He also read memo from Cary Campbell, Building Official, which is on file in the City Offices. Mayor Cotant questioned the handicapped parking. Evan Byington also questioned the parking spaces that were required in memo. Steven Smart said the use of the park for parking would not always be available; part of the year park would be very busy. Kathleen Kirkham, 410 Stuart, said they proposed to build a double car garage and add a room avove for a dance studio. The most children she would be able ko handle would be 10 students at a time. She said children are usually dropped off about five minutes before and five minutes after the hour, which would average about five cars. She said had classes from 4:00 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. She felt children that weighed between 30 and 40 pounds, would not require the additional construction. Mayor Cotant replied that once the City has adopted the Uniform Building Code if there would be an injury due to the construction, the city would be held liable. Mrs. Kirkham said if their present garage was structurally sound, they would like to build room over it. PUBLIC HEARING - RICKIE AND KATHLEEN KiRKHAM= continued Commission members discussed the square footage required under a home occupation. Home occupation can not alter the appearance of home. Chairman Anderson opened public hearing for public comment. being none, public hearing closed. There Dee Stalder was concerned about the street business would be on, the congestion on the street at the present time any additional traffic will cause problems. Chairman Anderson expressed concern, facility being built on home for commercial uses, when there are plenty of commercial areas within the city; if space already exiSt~ on residence, then wouldn't be bothered. Commission members discussed the traffic problems on Stuart Avenue. Lots are small with single family garages, with a lot of cars parking on the street. Dee Stalder made motion to deny the conditional use permit for Rickie and Kathleen Kirkham, 410 Stuart, to build a double car garage, onto their home, with a room above. The room to be used for a business, Kirkham Dance Acadamey. He said it would add a detrimental effect on traffic in the area; that it would change the neighborhood, with a business in the neighborhood, from this standpoint, safety is prime concern, as Stuart is so narrow and so crowded it needs .; no additional traffic. Bob Anderson seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Anderson, yes; Corrington, yes; Byington, yes; Cotant, yes, Stalder, yes; Anderson, yes. 3. A proposal by Sally Norman for a conditional use permit, to conduct a home occupation, a small kitchen to decorate cakes and hand dip chocolates and candies, at 5706 Moses. Property is presently zoned General Residential (R-2). Chairman Anderson read a memo from Cary Campbell, Building Official, asking question if Mrs. Norman was going to hold classes, to instruct. She said she was not. Sally Norman, 5706 Moses, said she had been decorating cakes for the past fifteen years for family and freinds. She said she would like to have a small kitchen, separate from her own, to decorate cakes and hand dip candies and chocolates. She would like to build to meet the requirements of the Health Department. Evan Byington asked to step down from the commission at this time, as he had a conflict of interest. Dee Stalder asked Mrs. Norman about traffic. She said many of the things she made, she delivered. She said she would like t~ have a sign. PUBLID HEARING - SALLY NORMAN - continued Chairman Anderson opened public hearing for comment. Evan Byington, 5742 Moses, said he lived close to the Norman's the business would be done on a small scale, and that very little traffic would be generated, with access right off Abraham. There being no other public comment, public hearing closed. Ted Corrington made motion to approve conditional use application of Sally Norman, to conduct a home occupation, a small kitchen to decorate cakes and hand dip chocolates and candies, at 5706 Moses. Motion was seconded by Mayor Cotant. Roll call vote: Stalder, yes; Cotant, yes; Corrington, yes; Anderson, yes; Anderson. yes. 4. A proposal by Craig and Lisa Lish, for a conditional use permit, to operate a Animal Grooming (Dog & Cat) Shop in their home, at 4642 Targhee Place. Property is presently zone General Residential (R-2). Chairman Anderson asked for comment from Steven Smart. He said a Pet Grooming Shop, as a business not allowed in General Controls, but can be considered as a home occupation. Lisa Lish, 4642 Targhee Place, said she would like to operate a small animal grooming shop, on a small scale, said she would do about five dogs a day. She said dogs are dropped off and picked up on a staggered schedule. She said when not being worked on, dogs are confined. She said she would cary insurance on the dogs and customers. Mrs. Lish said she would like to operate shop in her basement. Ted Corrington asked her about training. She said she had had extensive training. She said when dogs not in her hands they are caged, they are never allowed outside; she would do four or five dogs a day, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00p.m. Mayor Cotant mentioned that Targhee Place was a narrow street with a lot of traffic. Chairman Anderson open, meeting for public comment. Dave Hansen, 4627 Targhee Place, said he was against a business in the area, the additional traffic in area it would generate. He said children play in the street and any extra traffic would add to the problems. Darla Hill, 4618 Targhee Place, said she to was against the business because of the additional traffic. PUBLIC HEARING - CRAIG AND LISA LISH - contined Clair Buttars said he could not see how ten cars a day would affect the traffic that much. He said Mrs. Lish wanted to do this, so she could be home with her family. Public hearing closed for public comment. Commission members discussed the traffic in area and children playing in streets. Mr. Hansen said said there were business operating illegaly, he was told they should inform the city of people operating such businesses. Mayor Cotant made motion to deny the conditional use permit for Craig and Lisa Lish to operate a Animal Grooming (Dog and Cat) Shop in their home, at 4642 Targhee Place, due ~.the traffic and children in area. Dee Stalder seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Stalder, yes; Cotant, yes; Byington, yes; Corrington, no; Anderson, yes; Anderson, yes. Motion Dorothy L..~ard, Secretary to adjourn at 9:05 p.m. te And'~l~ ~~~o~, Ch-airman CITY OF CHUBBUCK LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER This matter having come before the Commission for public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by law, on Mav 1 , 1986 , upon the application of Hugh R. Hadley & Noel Christensen (hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use permit to construct a Self -Service Storaqe facilitv on the real property located at 4709 Yellowstone and the Commission having heard testimony from interested parties and being fully advised in the matter, now makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use permit as particularly described above. 2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have been met. 3. The property in question is zoned C-2 or General Commercial pursuant to the Land Use Ordinance of the City of Chubbuck. 4. The property is designated as C-2 General Commercial in the duly adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck. 5. Relevent criteria and standards for consideration of this application are set forth in Land Use Ordinance #241 6. The existing neighboring land uses in the immediate area of this property are: To the north, Commercial to the south, Cnmmarr- i a 1 to the east CnmmPrria1 ; to the west ReS.ideptia1 7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant criteria and standards are as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 1 �k9 A. — No public cmment - for or against B. C. D. E. F. G. n H. 8. Owners of adjacent property daVd / have not expressed approval of the issuance of the requested conditional use permit. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and Development Commission hereby enters the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The use for which the permit is sought viiIYY / will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. 2. The permit sought wiA-/1/// will not produce an adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2 n 3. The permit sought WG / will not produce a negative impact on transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with. 4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with the ..noise and traffic condition now existing dcbd:� / does not indicate that the permit should be denied. 5. The use for which the permit is sought /SAO/I/V / shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land. 6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use 4.M / will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands. 7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other development within the City has / has not been minimized by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible. E_ 0 10. The requested conditional use permit, if granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions set forth herinafter. DECTSTOM 1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the for=,W1*,t1be finds that the request of the applicant should / approved. 2. The following conditions, if any, should be imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to the imposition of the same: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 3 FA -M-112 /-1 3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant is / is not granted, subject to the foregoing conditions. DATED this 1 day of May 198 6 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COD By: Motion by Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr. , seconded by Dee Stalder , TO adopt the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision. ROLL CALL: Commission Member Vote Stalder FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 4 Yes /'� Anderson Yes Yes FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 5 CITY OF CHUBBUCK LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER This matter having come before the Commission for public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by law, on May 1 , 198 6 , upon the application of Rickie & Kathleen Kirkham (hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use permit to operate as, a home occupation, a Dance Academy from roon on the upper level of a double car garage tobe constructed. on the real property located at 410 Stuart and the Commission having heard testimony from interested parties and being fully advised in the matter, now makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use permit as particularly described above. 2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have been met. 3. The property in question is zoned R-2 or General Residential pursuant to the Land Use Ordinance of the City of Chubbuck. 4. The property is designated as R-2 (�nAra l $As irlential in the duly adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck. 5. Relevent criteria and standards for consideration of this application are set forth in T.;:; n cl TT ca nrrlinanr.e #241 6. The existing neighboring land uses in the immediate area of this property are: To the north, Residential % to the south, Residential to the east Residential_ to the west Residential 7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant criteria and standards are as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 1 M A. Existing on street parking createsa safety hazard D. Dance Area - 30 x 30 = 900 square feet Existing home - before construction 1200 sa feet Addition would be significant change to the house appearance. E. F. G. n H. 8. Owners of adjacent property have / have not expressed approval of the issuance of the requested conditional use permit. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and Development Commission hereby enters the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The use for which the permit is sought will / 4iY1/ 44� be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. 2. The permit sought will / will not produce an adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent properties. n FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2 B. 75 - 100 Students - 6 to 10 an hoer C. 3 sessions perday - 1 to 11/2 hours each D. Dance Area - 30 x 30 = 900 square feet Existing home - before construction 1200 sa feet Addition would be significant change to the house appearance. E. F. G. n H. 8. Owners of adjacent property have / have not expressed approval of the issuance of the requested conditional use permit. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and Development Commission hereby enters the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The use for which the permit is sought will / 4iY1/ 44� be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. 2. The permit sought will / will not produce an adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent properties. n FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2 n 3. The permit sought IVM� // will not produce a negative impact on transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with. 4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with the .._.noise and traffic condition now existing does / d,6,6,6/tO/t/ indicate that the permit should be denied. 5. The use for which the permit is sought dhdYY / shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land. 6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use vbill / will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands. 7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other development within the City has / has not been minimized by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible. M M 10. The requested conditional use permit, if granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions set forth herinafter. DECISION 1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the request of the applicant pWW� should not be approved. 2. The following conditions, if any, should be imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to the imposition of the same: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 3 n 3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant i/ / is not granted, subject to the foregoing conditions. DATED this 1 day of May 198 6 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT C( a, Motion by Dee Stalder seconded by Bob Anderson , TO adopt the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision. ROLL CALL: Commission Member Vote Andy-rcnn Y -es Corrington Yes Byington Yes 110� Cotant Yes FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 4 t n Stalder Anderson FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 5 Yes Yes CITY OF CHUBBUCK LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER This matter having come before the Commission for public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by law, on May 1 , 198 6 , upon the application of Sally Norman (hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use permit to operate a Cake Decorating & Candy making , home occupation on the real property located at 5706 Moses and the Commission having heard testimony from interested parties and being fully advised in the matter, now makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use permit as particularly described above. 2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have been met. 3. The property in question is zoned R-2 or pursuant to the Land o t e City of Chubbuck. U ss e r i ftftt11 � 4. The property is designated as R-2 General Residential in the duly adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck. 5. Relevent criteria and standards for consideration of this application are set forth in rand Use nY-dinanr.P 49AI 6. The existing neighboring land uses in the immediate area of this property are: To the north, RPc;.aPntial ; to the south, RP,ir7Pntial ; to the east RPsidpntia1 to the west RAfi l dp-nt l a 1 7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant criteria and standards are as follows: } FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 1 'ko j A. No Classes. Mrs. Norman, only, involved. n rla��A� ;,, trA future aPossibility blit will ha�re to ra-;4p 1�r fnr condlti.G1na3- 14so at that times C. FIM E. F. G. H. 8. Owners of adjacent property have /V41Y'/f expressed approval of the issuance of the requeste conditional use permit. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and Development Commission hereby enters the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The use for which the permit is sought *0// will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. 2. The permit sought h/i,/X / will not produce an adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2 n 3. The permit sought ��// will not produce a negative impact on transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with. 4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with the __noise and traffic condition now existing dOO4 / does not indicate that the permit should be denied. 5. The use for which the permit is sought Eylya/]/1 / shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land. /1 6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use ZZ /will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands. 7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other development within the City has / has not been minimized by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible. 0 a 10. The requested conditional use permit, if granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions set forth herinafter. DECISION 1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the request of the applicant should / ghhkJW/ / 4/approved. 2. The following conditions, if any, should be imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to the imposition of the same: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 3 ►r No Classes 3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant is subject to the foregoing conditions. DATED this 1 day of May , 198 6 . LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT k- k, BI; Motion by Ted Corrington , seconded byJahp ntrnr-TO adopt the foregoing endings of ac , Conclusions of Law and Decision. ROLL CALL: Commission Member Vote St 1 dt-r VPC cot ant YPC Corrl ng,t on VPS Anderson VPs Anderson Yes FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 4 CITY OF CHUBBUCK LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER This matter having come before the Commission for public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by law, on May 1 , 198 6 , upon the application of Craig & Lisa Lish (hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use permit to _operate as a home occupation a pet grooming shop on the real property located at 4642 Targhee Place and the Commission having heard testimony from interested parties and being fully advised in the matter, now makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use permit as particularly described above. 2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have been met. 3. The property in question is zoned R-2 or ial pursuant to the Land Use Or finance o e City of Chubbuck. 4. The property is designated as R-2 General Residential in the duly adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck. 5. Relevent criteria and standards for consideration of this application are set forth in Land Use Ordinance #241 6. The existing neighboring land uses in the immediate area of this property are: To the north, to the south, RP,;dP„t;ai to the east RPs;HPnt;al to the west RPG;rlPnt;al 7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant criteria and standards are as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page l n WiTSTRINE IFEM.FEES MEN OWN M C. 2 off street parking spaces a E. F. G. H. 8. Owners of adjacent property /tyarv/e/ / / yayp, reit expressed approval of the issuance of the requested conditional use permit. BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and Development Commission hereby enters the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The use for which the permit is sought will / *11 A1fAkW be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. 2. The permit sought M:V]/V / will not produce an adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2 3. The permit sought AAAA// will not produce a ,*OON negative impact on transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with. n 4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with the __noise and traffic condition now existing does / opf-p/pp;L/indicate that the permit should be denied. 5. The use for which the permit is sought qljcjJ/� / shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land. 6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use Oill / will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands. 7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other development within the City has / has not been minimized by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible. 0 9. 10. The requested conditional use permit, if granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions set forth herinafter. DECISION 1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the request of the applicant ,s,hp*,d / should not be approved. 2. The following conditions, if any, should be imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to the imposition of the same: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 3 3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant j�!X// is not granted, subject to the foregoing conditions. DATED this 1 day of May , 198 6 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COrRreT 11 C, Tr%,Kr By Motion by Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr , seconded by Dee Stalder , TO adopt the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision. ROLL CALL: Commission Member Vote sta-ldar ves Cotant Yes Corrington No Byington Yes FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONS - Page 4 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 5