HomeMy WebLinkAbout005 01 86LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES
May 1, 1986
Minutes of the regular meeting of the Land Use and Development
Commission held in the city municipal building May 1
1986. ' '
Present: Chairman Pete Anderson, Evan Byington, Bob Anderson,
Ted Corrington, Dee Stalder and Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr,
Public Works Director Steven Smart, Secretary Dorothy Ward.
Bob Allen, Sue Parrish and Myrna Cain were excused.
Meeting called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Anderson.
Chairman Anderson asked for any additions or corrections to the
minutes of April 3, 1986. There being none, Dee Stalder made
motion to accept mintes as written. Evan Byington seconded
motion, with all voting in favor.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM:
1. A proposal by Hugh R. Hadley and Noel Christensen for a
conditional use permit to construct Self-service Storage
Facility-General Pub~and Commercial Storage at 4709
Yellowstone Avenue. Property is presently zoned General
Commercial (C-2).
Chairman Anderson asked for comment from Steven Smart. He said
the proposed use not listed under Genral Controls in the
Land Use Ordinance and therefor would fall under a conditional
use permit. The land is vacant and is zoned commercial.
Chairman Anderson said property is off Yellowstone Avenue, north
of Linden Avenue, it is about 194 feet off from Yellowstone
and access will be a 25 foot paved road.
John Bush, 3221 Plateau Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, representing
Mr. Hadley and Mr. Christensen as co-developers on property
said they proposed to develop mini storage in this particular
area, as it is non frontage property. He said it would add
to overall standing of commercial area in developing as
zoned.
Mr. Bush said they would have security fencing and lighting at
night. He said units would be operated basically in day
light hours for storage. He said there would be no traffic
problem to the surrounding area, there would be about
292 units, which would be an appropriate type of use of
this property; for the value of the property.
Bob Anderson ask~ if they would be developing units in phases.
Mr. Bush said they would be built all at once, they would
be built of cinder block with metal roof and the interior
would be of metal.
Mr. Bush said they would utilize 6foot chain link fencing south
of the easement and lower east side will be slatted off with
PUBLIC HEARING - H. HADLEY & N. CHRISTENSEN - continued
with redwood slats, the lighting will be mercury vapor lights
on the buildings.
Ted Corrington asked if the storage would be all inside storage.
Mr. Bush said there would be no outside storage.
Chairman Anderson opened public hearing for public comment.
being none, public hearing closed.
There
Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr. made motion to grant a conditional use
permit to Hugh R. Hadley and Noel Christensen, to construct
Self-service Storage Facility - Ge~l Public and Commercial
Storage at 4709 Yellowstone Avenue. Dee Stalder seconded
the motion.
Roll call vote, Stalder, yes; Cotant, yes; Byington, yes;
Corrington, yes; Anderson, yes; Anderson, yes.
2. A Proposal by Rickie and Kathleen Kirkham for a conditional
use permit to build a double car garage, onto their home,
with a room above. The room would be used for a business,
Kirkham Dance Academy, a dance school. Property is presently
zoned General Residential (R-2).
Chairman Anderson asked for comment from Steven Smart; he explained
a Dance Acadamy not allowed under ordinance in a residential
zone, this item would have to be considered as a home
occupation.
Chairman Anderson read criteria for home occupations. He also
read memo from Cary Campbell, Building Official, which is
on file in the City Offices.
Mayor Cotant questioned the handicapped parking. Evan Byington
also questioned the parking spaces that were required in
memo.
Steven Smart said the use of the park for parking would not
always be available; part of the year park would be very
busy.
Kathleen Kirkham, 410 Stuart, said they proposed to build a
double car garage and add a room avove for a dance studio.
The most children she would be able ko handle would be 10
students at a time. She said children are usually dropped
off about five minutes before and five minutes after the
hour, which would average about five cars. She said had
classes from 4:00 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. She felt children
that weighed between 30 and 40 pounds, would not require
the additional construction.
Mayor Cotant replied that once the City has adopted the Uniform
Building Code if there would be an injury due to the
construction, the city would be held liable.
Mrs. Kirkham said if their present garage was structurally sound,
they would like to build room over it.
PUBLIC HEARING - RICKIE AND KATHLEEN KiRKHAM= continued
Commission members discussed the square footage required under a
home occupation. Home occupation can not alter the
appearance of home.
Chairman Anderson opened public hearing for public comment.
being none, public hearing closed.
There
Dee Stalder was concerned about the street business would be on,
the congestion on the street at the present time any additional
traffic will cause problems.
Chairman Anderson expressed concern, facility being built on home
for commercial uses, when there are plenty of commercial areas
within the city; if space already exiSt~ on residence, then
wouldn't be bothered.
Commission members discussed the traffic problems on Stuart Avenue.
Lots are small with single family garages, with a lot of cars
parking on the street.
Dee Stalder made motion to deny the conditional use permit for
Rickie and Kathleen Kirkham, 410 Stuart, to build a double
car garage, onto their home, with a room above. The room
to be used for a business, Kirkham Dance Acadamey. He said
it would add a detrimental effect on traffic in the area;
that it would change the neighborhood, with a business in
the neighborhood, from this standpoint, safety is prime concern,
as Stuart is so narrow and so crowded it needs .;
no additional traffic.
Bob Anderson seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Anderson, yes;
Corrington, yes; Byington, yes; Cotant, yes, Stalder, yes;
Anderson, yes.
3. A proposal by Sally Norman for a conditional use permit,
to conduct a home occupation, a small kitchen to decorate
cakes and hand dip chocolates and candies, at 5706 Moses.
Property is presently zoned General Residential (R-2).
Chairman Anderson read a memo from Cary Campbell, Building
Official, asking question if Mrs. Norman was going to
hold classes, to instruct. She said she was not.
Sally Norman, 5706 Moses, said she had been decorating cakes
for the past fifteen years for family and freinds. She
said she would like to have a small kitchen, separate from
her own, to decorate cakes and hand dip candies and
chocolates. She would like to build to meet the requirements
of the Health Department.
Evan Byington asked to step down from the commission at this
time, as he had a conflict of interest.
Dee Stalder asked Mrs. Norman about traffic. She said many of
the things she made, she delivered. She said she would like
t~ have a sign.
PUBLID HEARING - SALLY NORMAN - continued
Chairman Anderson opened public hearing for comment.
Evan Byington, 5742 Moses, said he lived close to the Norman's
the business would be done on a small scale, and that very
little traffic would be generated, with access right off
Abraham.
There being no other public comment, public hearing closed.
Ted Corrington made motion to approve conditional use application
of Sally Norman, to conduct a home occupation, a small
kitchen to decorate cakes and hand dip chocolates and
candies, at 5706 Moses.
Motion was seconded by Mayor Cotant. Roll call vote: Stalder,
yes; Cotant, yes; Corrington, yes; Anderson, yes; Anderson.
yes.
4. A proposal by Craig and Lisa Lish, for a conditional
use permit, to operate a Animal Grooming (Dog & Cat) Shop
in their home, at 4642 Targhee Place. Property is presently
zone General Residential (R-2).
Chairman Anderson asked for comment from Steven Smart. He said
a Pet Grooming Shop, as a business not allowed in General
Controls, but can be considered as a home occupation.
Lisa Lish, 4642 Targhee Place, said she would like to operate a
small animal grooming shop, on a small scale, said she
would do about five dogs a day. She said dogs are dropped
off and picked up on a staggered schedule. She said when
not being worked on, dogs are confined. She said she
would cary insurance on the dogs and customers.
Mrs. Lish said she would like to operate shop in her basement.
Ted Corrington asked her about training. She said she had had
extensive training. She said when dogs not in her hands
they are caged, they are never allowed outside; she
would do four or five dogs a day, between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00p.m.
Mayor Cotant mentioned that Targhee Place was a narrow street
with a lot of traffic.
Chairman Anderson open, meeting for public comment.
Dave Hansen, 4627 Targhee Place, said he was against a business
in the area, the additional traffic in area it would
generate. He said children play in the street and any
extra traffic would add to the problems.
Darla Hill, 4618 Targhee Place, said she to was against the
business because of the additional traffic.
PUBLIC HEARING - CRAIG AND LISA LISH
- contined
Clair Buttars said he could not see how ten cars a day would
affect the traffic that much. He said Mrs. Lish wanted
to do this, so she could be home with her family.
Public hearing closed for public comment.
Commission members discussed the traffic in area and children
playing in streets.
Mr. Hansen said said there were business operating illegaly,
he was told they should inform the city of people operating
such businesses.
Mayor Cotant made motion to deny the conditional use permit for
Craig and Lisa Lish to operate a Animal Grooming (Dog
and Cat) Shop in their home, at 4642 Targhee Place, due
~.the traffic and children in area.
Dee Stalder seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Stalder, yes;
Cotant, yes; Byington, yes; Corrington, no; Anderson, yes;
Anderson, yes.
Motion
Dorothy L..~ard, Secretary
to adjourn at 9:05 p.m.
te And'~l~
~~~o~, Ch-airman
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
This matter having come before the Commission for
public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by
law, on Mav 1 , 1986 , upon the
application of Hugh R. Hadley & Noel Christensen
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a
conditional use permit to construct a Self -Service
Storaqe facilitv
on the real property located at 4709 Yellowstone
and the Commission having heard testimony from
interested parties and being fully advised in the
matter, now makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use
permit as particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public
hearing have been met.
3. The property in question is zoned C-2 or
General Commercial pursuant to the Land
Use Ordinance of the City of Chubbuck.
4. The property is designated as C-2 General
Commercial in the duly adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevent criteria and standards for
consideration of this application are set forth in
Land Use Ordinance #241
6. The existing neighboring land uses in the
immediate area of this property are: To the north,
Commercial
to the south, Cnmmarr- i a 1
to the east CnmmPrria1 ;
to the west ReS.ideptia1
7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the
relevant criteria and standards are as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 1
�k9
A. — No public cmment - for or against
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
n
H.
8. Owners of adjacent property daVd / have not
expressed approval of the issuance of the requested
conditional use permit.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land
Use and Development Commission hereby enters the
following
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought viiIYY /
will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought wiA-/1/// will not produce an
adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent
properties.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 2
n
3. The permit sought WG / will not produce a
negative impact on transportation facilities, public
utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural
environment any greater than had the strict terms of the
Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by
the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in
conjunction with the ..noise and traffic condition now
existing dcbd:� / does not indicate that the permit should
be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought /SAO/I/V /
shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding
property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by
the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use
4.M / will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the
surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other
development within the City has / has not been minimized
by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible.
E_
0
10. The requested conditional use permit, if
granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions
set forth herinafter.
DECTSTOM
1. The Land Use and Development Commission,
pursuant to the for=,W1*,t1be
finds that the request of the
applicant should / approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, should be
imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit
and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional
use permit agrees to the imposition of the same:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 3
FA -M-112
/-1
3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the
Applicant is / is not granted, subject to the foregoing
conditions.
DATED this 1 day of May
198 6
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
COD
By:
Motion by Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr. ,
seconded by Dee Stalder , TO
adopt the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
and Decision.
ROLL CALL:
Commission Member Vote
Stalder
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 4
Yes
/'� Anderson Yes
Yes
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 5
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
This matter having come before the Commission for
public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by
law, on May 1 , 198 6 , upon the
application of Rickie & Kathleen Kirkham
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a
conditional use permit to operate as, a home occupation,
a Dance Academy from roon on the upper level of a double car
garage tobe constructed.
on the real property located at 410 Stuart
and the Commission having heard testimony from
interested parties and being fully advised in the
matter, now makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use
permit as particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public
hearing have been met.
3. The property in question is zoned R-2 or
General Residential pursuant to the Land
Use Ordinance of the City of Chubbuck.
4. The property is designated as R-2
(�nAra l $As irlential in the duly adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevent criteria and standards for
consideration of this application are set forth in
T.;:; n cl TT ca nrrlinanr.e #241
6. The existing neighboring land uses in the
immediate area of this property are: To the north,
Residential %
to the south, Residential
to the east Residential_
to the west Residential
7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the
relevant criteria and standards are as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 1
M
A. Existing on street parking createsa safety hazard
D. Dance Area - 30 x 30 = 900 square feet
Existing home - before construction 1200 sa feet
Addition would be significant change to the house
appearance.
E.
F.
G.
n
H.
8. Owners of adjacent property have / have not
expressed approval of the issuance of the requested
conditional use permit.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land
Use and Development Commission hereby enters the
following
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought will /
4iY1/ 44� be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought will / will not produce an
adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent
properties.
n
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 2
B.
75
- 100 Students
- 6
to
10 an hoer
C.
3
sessions perday
- 1 to
11/2
hours each
D. Dance Area - 30 x 30 = 900 square feet
Existing home - before construction 1200 sa feet
Addition would be significant change to the house
appearance.
E.
F.
G.
n
H.
8. Owners of adjacent property have / have not
expressed approval of the issuance of the requested
conditional use permit.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land
Use and Development Commission hereby enters the
following
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought will /
4iY1/ 44� be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought will / will not produce an
adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent
properties.
n
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 2
n
3. The permit sought IVM� // will not produce a
negative impact on transportation facilities, public
utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural
environment any greater than had the strict terms of the
Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by
the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in
conjunction with the .._.noise and traffic condition now
existing does / d,6,6,6/tO/t/ indicate that the permit should
be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought dhdYY /
shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding
property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by
the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use
vbill / will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the
surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other
development within the City has / has not been minimized
by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible.
M
M
10. The requested conditional use permit, if
granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions
set forth herinafter.
DECISION
1. The Land Use and Development Commission,
pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the request of the
applicant pWW� should not be approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, should be
imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit
and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional
use permit agrees to the imposition of the same:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 3
n
3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the
Applicant i/ / is not granted, subject to the foregoing
conditions.
DATED this 1 day of May
198 6
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
C(
a,
Motion by Dee Stalder
seconded by Bob Anderson , TO
adopt the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
and Decision.
ROLL CALL:
Commission Member Vote
Andy-rcnn Y -es
Corrington Yes
Byington
Yes
110� Cotant Yes
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 4
t
n Stalder
Anderson
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 5
Yes
Yes
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
This matter having come before the Commission for
public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by
law, on May 1 , 198 6 , upon the
application of Sally Norman
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a
conditional use permit to operate a Cake Decorating &
Candy making , home occupation
on the real property located at 5706 Moses
and the Commission having heard testimony from
interested parties and being fully advised in the
matter, now makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use
permit as particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public
hearing have been met.
3. The property in question is zoned R-2 or
pursuant to the Land
o t e City of Chubbuck.
U ss e r i ftftt11
�
4. The property is designated as R-2 General
Residential in the duly adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevent criteria and standards for
consideration of this application are set forth in
rand Use nY-dinanr.P 49AI
6. The existing neighboring land uses in the
immediate area of this property are: To the north,
RPc;.aPntial ;
to the south, RP,ir7Pntial ;
to the east RPsidpntia1
to the west RAfi l dp-nt l a 1
7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the
relevant criteria and standards are as follows:
} FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 1
'ko j
A. No Classes. Mrs. Norman, only, involved.
n rla��A� ;,, trA future aPossibility blit will ha�re to
ra-;4p 1�r fnr condlti.G1na3- 14so at that times
C.
FIM
E.
F.
G.
H.
8. Owners of adjacent property have /V41Y'/f
expressed approval of the issuance of the requeste
conditional use permit.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land
Use and Development Commission hereby enters the
following
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought *0//
will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought h/i,/X / will not produce an
adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent
properties.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 2
n
3. The permit sought ��// will not produce a
negative impact on transportation facilities, public
utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural
environment any greater than had the strict terms of the
Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by
the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in
conjunction with the __noise and traffic condition now
existing dOO4 / does not indicate that the permit should
be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought Eylya/]/1 /
shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding
property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by
the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land.
/1 6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use
ZZ /will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the
surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other
development within the City has / has not been minimized
by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible.
0
a
10. The requested conditional use permit, if
granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions
set forth herinafter.
DECISION
1. The Land Use and Development Commission,
pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the request of the
applicant should / ghhkJW/ / 4/approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, should be
imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit
and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional
use permit agrees to the imposition of the same:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 3
►r
No Classes
3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the
Applicant is subject to the foregoing
conditions.
DATED this 1 day of May ,
198 6 .
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
k- k,
BI;
Motion by Ted Corrington ,
seconded byJahp ntrnr-TO
adopt the foregoing endings of ac , Conclusions of Law
and Decision.
ROLL CALL:
Commission Member Vote
St 1 dt-r VPC
cot ant YPC
Corrl ng,t on VPS
Anderson VPs
Anderson Yes
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 4
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
This matter having come before the Commission for
public hearing pursuant to public notice as required by
law, on May 1 , 198 6 , upon the
application of Craig & Lisa Lish
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a
conditional use permit to _operate as a home occupation a
pet grooming shop
on the real property located at 4642 Targhee Place
and the Commission having heard testimony from
interested parties and being fully advised in the
matter, now makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicanat has applied for a condtional use
permit as particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public
hearing have been met.
3. The property in question is zoned R-2 or
ial pursuant to the Land
Use Or finance o e City of Chubbuck.
4. The property is designated as R-2
General Residential in the duly adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevent criteria and standards for
consideration of this application are set forth in
Land Use Ordinance #241
6. The existing neighboring land uses in the
immediate area of this property are: To the north,
to the south, RP,;dP„t;ai
to the east RPs;HPnt;al
to the west RPG;rlPnt;al
7. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the
relevant criteria and standards are as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page l
n
WiTSTRINE IFEM.FEES MEN OWN M
C. 2 off street parking spaces
a
E.
F.
G.
H.
8. Owners of adjacent property /tyarv/e/ / / yayp, reit
expressed approval of the issuance of the requested
conditional use permit.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land
Use and Development Commission hereby enters the
following
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought will /
*11 A1fAkW be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought M:V]/V / will not produce an
adverse impact on the economic values of adjacent
properties.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 2
3. The permit sought AAAA// will not produce a
,*OON negative impact on transportation facilities, public
utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural
environment any greater than had the strict terms of the
Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
n
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by
the use for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in
conjunction with the __noise and traffic condition now
existing does / opf-p/pp;L/indicate that the permit should
be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought qljcjJ/� /
shall not work an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding
property owners by virtue of its physical nature or by
the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use
Oill / will not conflict with aesthetic qualities of the
surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other
development within the City has / has not been minimized
by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible.
0
9.
10. The requested conditional use permit, if
granted, should be maintained subject to the condtions
set forth herinafter.
DECISION
1. The Land Use and Development Commission,
pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the request of the
applicant ,s,hp*,d / should not be approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, should be
imposed upon the granting of said conditional use permit
and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional
use permit agrees to the imposition of the same:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 3
3. The Conditional Use Permit requested by the
Applicant j�!X// is not granted, subject to the foregoing
conditions.
DATED this 1 day of May ,
198 6
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
COrRreT 11 C, Tr%,Kr
By
Motion by Mayor John O. Cotant, Jr ,
seconded by Dee Stalder , TO
adopt the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
and Decision.
ROLL CALL:
Commission Member Vote
sta-ldar ves
Cotant Yes
Corrington No
Byington Yes
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISIONS - Page 4
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION - Page 5