HomeMy WebLinkAbout012 05 96 CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
DECEMBER 5, 1996
Minutes of the regular meeting of the Land Use and Development Commission held in the City
Municipal Building December 5, 1996.
Present: Acting Chairman Pete Anderson, Commission Members: Myma Cain, Mary Harker,
Gayle Anderson; Council Representative Marvin Gunter; City Staff Steve Smart and Larry
Kohntopp; Attorney Tom Holmes; Secretary Myrna Crapo.
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Pete Anderson at 8:05 p.m. Chairman
Anderson asked if anyone had a conflict of interest for any of the items on the agenda. There was
none.
Acting Chairman Pete Anderson asked for approval of the minutes of the November 7, 1996
meeting. Mary Harker moved to approve the minutes with Myrna Cain seconding. All voted in
favor.
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. An application by Gary Cooper, P.O. Box 2618, Pocatello, for a Conditional Use Permit for
Warehouse/Wholesale at 4278 Bullock Street. The property is presently zoned General
Commercial (C-2).
Chairman Anderson asked for any further comments from the staff and for any questions by the
commission. There was none.
Gary Cooper, P.O. Box 2618, Pocatello, the application is for the property that is behind
Walmart. They are purchasing the Lake Shore Building that was previously used as a diesel and
truck and trailer repair shop by the Watson Brothers. They want to modify that building to house
two tenants. The front section would be for the State of Idaho for a Crime Lab and the back part
for Van Waters and Rogers. They are a wholesale/Retail on a national basis. They sale chemicals
of various kinds.
Chairman Anderson opened the meeting for public comment for or against. There was none.
The public comment portion of the meeting was closed and the meeting was brought back to the
commission for a discussion.
Gayle Anderson moved to approve the application by Gary Cooper Pocatello for a conditional
use permit for a warehouse/wholesale at 4278 Bullock Street Property is presently zoned General
Commercial (C-2). Mary Harker seconded. Roll call vote: Myrna Cain, yes; Pete Anderson,
yes; Mary Harker, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes.
December 5, 1996
Page 2
GENERAL BUSINESS:
1. An application for a Final Development Plan for a PUD by Homes West, Inc. P.O. Box 5691,
Chubbuck, Idaho for Homes West at Lots 1 & 2 of Block 4 Siebert Tract; North end of Ronald
Road. The property is presently zoned Limited Residential (R-2).
Attorney Holmes reviewed the city code conceming a PUD. Chairman Anderson asked for any
comments from the commission and then asked for a motion.
Gayle Anderson moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Final Development
Plan for a PUD by Homes West Inc. P.O. Box 5691, Chubbuck, Idaho for lots 1 & 2 of block 4,
Siebert Tract; North end of Ronald Road. Property is presently zoned Limited Residential (R-2).
Myrna Cain seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Myma Cain, yes; Pete Anderson, yes; Mary
Harker, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes.
2. An application by Dennis & Kathy Murray, 11481 N. Rio Vista Road for a Conditional Use
Permit to put a manufactured home at south end of Rose Street. Property is presently zoned
Limited Residential (R-2).
The commission discussed what to do with the application. The applicant was not at the meeting.
Mary Harker moved to table the item concerning the property of Dennis and Kathy Murray for
the development of the property at the end of Rose Street until the January Meeting and that a
letter advising them of the vote should be sent to them within two weeks of that meeting that they
might be able to make arrangements to attend or that they might be able to notify us as to whether
we should consider the item moved. Gayle Anderson seconded. All voted in favor.
3. Approval of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision for Mill End Fabric.
Myrna Cain moved to accept the finding of fact on the Mill End Fabric Store. Mary Harker
seconded. All voted in favor.
4. A discussion of an ordinance eliminating a conditional use as a request for a planned unit
development, and reviewing the PUD approval process.
The commission discussed not bring the final PUD through the commission; or just having major
PUD come back for the final PUD.
Mary Harker moved that the proposed ordinance changes be completed and be resubmitted back
to the Land Use at the January meeting and set for public hearing for that meeting. Myrna Cain
seconded. All voted in favor.
The commission discussed the January meeting dm 1)Pary Harker moved to have meeting on
the 9th of January. Myma Cain seconded. All~,~/e/ifi ~vor.!
Mary Harker moved to adjourn with Gale ~ .,~r~ng. Meeting adjourn at 9:10 pM.
~ te And'~r~gn, Acting Chairman
Myrna Crapo, Secretary
io
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
This matter having come before the Commission for public hearing pursuant to public
notice as required by law, on December 5, 1996, upon the application of Gary Cooper (hereinafter
referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use permit for a warehouse/wholesale on the real
property located at 4278 Bullock and the Commission having heard testimony from interested
parties and being fully advised in the matter, now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit as particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have been met.
3. The property in question is zoned General Commercial (C-2) pursuant to the Land Use
Ordinance of the City of Chubbuck.
4. The property is designated as General Commercial (C-2) in the duly adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevant criteria and standards for consideration of this application are set forth in
Idaho Code section 67-6512 and in Chubbuck Code section 18.28.040 (C).
6. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant criteria and standards are as follows:
A. Applicant would modify the Lakeshore Building behind Walmart.
B. The building will be modified to have State of Idaho Crime Lab in the front.
Vanwaters and Rogers would use the back for storage and sale of chemicals.
C. No one from the public testified for or against the application.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and
Development Commission hereby enters the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 1
dsc chbbck08.129
'~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought will not produce an adverse impact on the economic values of
adjacent properties.
3. The permit sought will not produce a negative impact on transportation facilities,
public utilities, schools, public parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict
terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use for which the permit is
sought, when analyzed in conjunction with the noise and traffic conditions now existing does not
indicate that the permit should be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought shall not work an unreasonable hardship
upon surrounding property owners by virtue of its physical natures or by the impact of changes
made in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use will not conflict with aesthetic qualities
of the surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other development within the City has
been minimized by Applicant as much as is reasonably possible.
8. The requested conditional use permit, if granted, should be maintained subject to
the conditions set forth below.
DECISION
1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the foregoing, finds that the
request of the applicant should be approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, are hereby imposed upon the granting of said
conditional use permit and applicant, by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to
the imposition of the same: none.
3. The conditional use permit requested by the Applicant is granted.
4. Takings. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8001 et seq., the Commission makes the
following findings with respect to the decision in this action:
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2
dsc chbbckO8.129
r�l
A. This Action does not result in a permanent or temporary physical occupation of
private property.
B. This Action does not require the property owner to dedicate a portion of the
property or to grant an easement.
C. This Action does not deprive the owner of the property of all viable uses of the
property.
D. This Action does not have a significant impact on the landowner's economic
interest.
E. This Action does not deny a fundamental attribute of ownership.
F. This Action does not serve the same purpose that would be served by directly
prohibiting the use or action; nor does the condition imposed substantially advance such
purpose.
DATED this 25 day of �Qce�.,�a� , I gn
7.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 3
dsc chbbckO8.129
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION
By: _
hairm n