HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 14 1955 CMME[!,TING WAS CAI/.t:D TO CRDER AT ~.~.~. ~.
Members present were T,,~ ~RASnRE FEEUWICK VALENTY. YAFSEF AFD WARD. '
NINUTUs 0V TY~: PREVIOUS I,T~ b,Til:G WERE READ AND IT ?fAS SUGG~ STED THEY
N2 BROUG}~T UP T0 DATE iTiD APPROVED.
PliES NOR TNB NONTN WB2} TN!HR READ WRASURi,~ !,'OVl:,O AND FE},TWlCK SECONDRO
THAT BILLS YE PAID SURJNCT TO NR VALENTYS A~NOVAL.
OLD F, USII:NSS WAS TH:~;N DISCUSSA, D.
IT ]VAS BROUGHT UP A~0IIT A SAFZ PON THE VILiAG:: FOR TEE PUR}'OS[ 0F
t<~S:IYG RECORDS AYD BOONS SA~E FRON FIRE 0R THEFT.
HR VALENTY RE~!ARIG[,'~ ON 'TNL AUDIT _-.ND STATRD IT WAS tRBTTY iELI STRaightene
0UT. 2~_ DOIT. .... ~PS ?iATE~ HOCF Ir!: 0WLD BY RAY P0'.,fD~-:t,x. . FOR I,':,:'-' I, CKr, IGHT.' ' ~
.... Sv ..... .~ F~I,: AI
i.}R VALENTY SUGGi;,ST}:]D :'l~ C!~NCK THR WATER I/o~,nSTC, IF ,~ N:iVF: ~ ~'
0N THE RECORDS. MRS BRYSON :I{O P-EIVA YiBRZIOCK F!,IFG CNARGiD PITT NOT
,'I.:~Tu~R. I:R VAIEFTY a:,:~ }.7R FENSLEY ,'to:~ TO. C.:~CN ON ;,~,~Tr~:, USNi~S
PY Tt!E FIRST CF THE }x~.,, YFAR.
}.ffl W. Ng'ISON HAVING SOLD HIS }ROPERTY R:.%ULSTA3 A REFUND OF HIS
Di:,t:OSIT F0R ORIgINAl, HCO:: Trp THIS HAS I,O.,¥,r "~='" ~'m ~ ~ .
_,~zff O','~rNER3 ARE T0 ~:2 CONT~CT.~D
IT WAS DECID.[:;D TO GET SlX SIGNS TAINTED 0~F,RRiI:G ~0 DOll ARS
FOR INFORNATION IFADIYG TO ARRH, ST AND CONVICTION CF AUYOI?N D~',STROYING
DA}LiGING VII~AGE PROPERTY.
~'~ICATIOY_~ F0N A B~_,~,R=~ _TIC,FEE FRON TFLX_ . HAPIEID AIRIONT ~"'~,~A.~, THEN DIS-
~,~,~, PUT N0 DECISIOY REACrJiD. IT WILl PTi lRb, 3l),FT~:,,'} T0 THE, VIllAGE,
BOARD AT THEIR NEXT NNETING T0 B}i HEI,D WEDNESDAY giST DECEI'?f'}R ~:,': 19Iq.
Tf:'OETlq~,R WITH 0T~i~R AP~IiCATIONS PON rtL, ER IICE!:SES.
THE NH:;: TING ',fAS AI~J01TRF! D AT 9.~p~p.m.
Village Clerk.
CHAIRNAN 07 TNN EOARD OF T_ o:j_~O,~Tt=r~.
Jones, Pomero~ & Jones
r~w~ers
C ENTEAL BLDra.
Poea~ello, Idaho
T, D, ~IONES, DECEASED
C, W, Prll~ERny, DECEABED
RALPH H. JDNES
December 21, 1955
Max Whittier
Attox,ney at Law
Po~atello, Idaho
Dea~ lq~x=
Iobert Poletti hm employed us in reference to the ques-
tion that has arisen ooncer~ing the validit7 of Ordinance No.
8 of the Village of Chubbuck. We have advised Mr. Poletti
that the p~operty that he now o~na, being the same property as
described in Ordinance ]~o. 8 of the Village of Chubbuck, is
now a part c~ the corporate limit~ of the Village of Chubbuck,
and that lrmofar as he is concerned, being a third pa~ty and
having purchased the property in good faith in reliance upon
the records of Bannock County 0ou~thouse, and also the record
of the 0rdinan~e ~h~ok of the Village of Chubbuek, that the
annexation l~ valid, lha~thermore, M~. Poletti has paid Village
taxes upon this property during the time he has ~ned it, and
his predecessors in interest paid the taxes prior thereto.
However~ we have been advised by you that there is some
question as to the regularity c~ certain proceedings in
respect tO the passage of said ordinance, Zn o~der to avoid
any litigation and expense eihhe~ to the Village of Chubbuck
or to 9. Polettt, we believe that a new ordinance, ratifying
and confix.ming Ordinance No. 8 should be immediately passed and
adopted by the Village of Chubbuck.
Fox. such purpose, we have prepared such an ordinance,
the original and a copy of which we are handing you herewith.
We would appreciate it very much if you, as Village Attorney,
would present the matter to the Board of Trustees
of said
Village at tonight,s meeting. ~ish to say tha_t both myself and
my son are tied up in a bank ma~ter tonight at ~ o'clock, and
fox. that reason neither one of us can be present to fully present
the matter. As we have'discussed the law wi~h you in respect to
this matter some time ago, we are Satisfied you are fully advised
c one erning.'
the same, and particularly ou~ position in the matter.
~t[ee~elint~et&c:sSeu~e._C_o_u~._.t o.f..ldah.o.has already ~_ecided this
wh---'- ~ -.-- A_nVOAVe~ r~e cz~y of Coeur d'Alene,
~ ~.oAn .u?euF ~ Alene under similar circumstances
· o aeny ~me validity of an annexat~e~
_ --_----..-,-/~.-o ~ · ~nAr~ par~y wr, o was not the owner c~ the
prcper~y a~ ~e time the property was sought ~o be annexed.
Max Whittie~
Deaembe~
Page
Fu~the~e, the language in the Hlllman oaae v. City of P°catello
supports this rule.
~. Poletti will be there in person and will, of course,
urge the immediate adoption and passage of this o~dinanoe. We
wish to make it clear that by ~equesting the adoption of this
or ~y p~e the invalidity O~dl~ce
me~ely to avoid any question a~ising in ~ furze, a~ to save
both t~ Village ~ ~ oli~t any expe~e in co,action
t~a ~tte~ by way of litigati~.
We are making y~ an extra copy cf this letter so that,
if you wish, the same may be filed as a part of the official
records of the Village of Chubbuck,
Yours tr~~
Ralph'~. ~cnes