HomeMy WebLinkAbout07 12 2005 Special CM133
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
July 12th, 2005
Minutes of a Special Meeting held at the Chubbuck City Council Chambers, July 12th, 2005.
Present: Mayor John O. Cotant, Council members Steven M. England, Marvin C. Gunter, Kent
Kearns, Attorney Thomas J. Holmes, Public Works Director Steven M. Smart and City
Clerk Ron C. Conlin. Council member Leroy S. Quick was excused.
Meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Mayor Cotant.
PURPOSE OF MEETING is to discuss 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Budget.
POLICE DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN - Chief of Police Randy Severe presented the
Police Department's 5 Year Strategic Plan.
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005-2006 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET - Fire Chief Eric King presented a
proposed 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Budget.
FC King explained why the Fire Department is asking for four additional people.
FC King explained the Fire Department is not getting their day to day work finished with
the crew they have.
FC King presented a new wage proposal. The proposal is to provide a single pay rate for
all work and training done by each employee. This includes every Wednesday, Saturday
training drill and station work that the employee attended or worked. This also includes
all emergency responses, not just fire related.
FC King stated the shift coverage shall stay the same per shift. When covering a shift the
employee shall receive his/her shift coverage pay, then in the event of a response that
person shall receive the hourly pay rate per incident.
Captain $16.00 hourly
Driver/Operator $14.00 "
Firefighter II $10.00 "
Firefighter I $ 8.00 "
Trainee $ 6.00 "
Shift Coverage
Normal $20.00 hourly
Holiday $50.00 "
135
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - (cont.)
July 12th, 2005
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2005-2006 PROPOSED BUDGET - (cont.)
Discussion about additional revenue that might be collected from Grants and from
insurance companies.
FC King went through line items explaining increases and decreases, most of the
increases in this projected budget is salaries.
Councilman Gunter stated these are justified expenses, it will probably be impossible to
cover everything Fire Department is asking for now, but the Council should look at
adding a bit at a time.
Councilman Keams felt the projections FC King has made over the years have been
pretty much correct.
Mayor Cotant stated the Ambulance District is not willing to help the City of Chubbuck
with our EMT Program.
Mayor Cotant expressed concern that maybe the Ambulance District might be slower to
respond because they know we have our EMT Program. Mayor Cotant stated the EMT
Program is good but maybe some residents might feel they are getting double taxed if the
resident is paying to the Ambulance District and property taxes to the EMT Program.
At 7:30 p.m, Councilman England moved, Councilman Keams seconded, with full Council
approval to adjourn meeting.
Ron C. Conlin, City Clerk
CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
Pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-604, the undersigned Mayor of the City of Chubbuck,
Idaho, hereby calls a special meeting of the City Council to be held in the Chubbuck City
Council Chambers, 5160 Yellowstone, Chubbuck, Idaho at the hour of 6:00 p.m, Tuesday, July
12th, 2005. The purpose of the Special Meeting is to conduct a study session on 2005-2006
Fiscal Year Budget. , - . ... . //'
/Date: ! fiJohn O. Cotant, Mayor
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUBBUCK, IDAHO
Pursuant to the call set forth above, notice is hereby given of a special meeting of the
Chubbuck City Council at the time and place, and for the object, recited in the call.
Ron C. Conlin, City Clerk
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTICE
The undersigned, Mayor and members of the Chubbuck City Council hereby
acknowledge receipt of notice of the special meeting as set forth above.
/John O. Cotant, Mayor lpate: I
Leroy S. Quick, Council member
Kent Kearns, Council member
Chubbuck Police
Department
Strategic Plan and
Resource Analysis
For effective operation in the year 2010
Our "Mission"
Officer Safety
2. Adequate, sustainable, dedicated funding
3. 90% Customer Satisfaction
4. 90% Employee Satisfaction
The likelihood of accomplishing our mission
is directly proportional to the amount of
resources allocated to it.
Change is inevitable -
Progress is optional
Where are we going?
1990 2000 Change
Chubbuck 7791 9700 (+1909)
Pocatello 46080 51466 (+5386)
Chubbuck grew at twice the rate Pocatello did
between 1990 and 2000; 25% vs. 12%
How do we get there from here ?
2005 2010
10655 11609
This projection is based on the same growth rate that
occurred between 1990 and 2000.
Is the growth rate the same now as it was then?
Rapid Growth
Recent article in the Idaho State Journal indicated
that Idaho was the 4th fastest ~owing state in
the United States.
Chubbuck is now the 14th largest city in the state
of Idaho.
During the first quarter of 2005 there were seven
less properties sold in the Pocatello area as in
the Idaho Falls area.
What is a "servicepoptdation"?
The service population is the residential
population#us the residents xvho come into the
city from the MSA (metropolitan statistical area)
on a day-to-day basis.
Weekday Weekend Day
15% - 20% 20% - 25%
13,800- 14,400 14,400 - 15,000
Is there any known correlation
between the population and how
many police officers are necessary to
provide effective services?
The International Association of Chiefs of Police have
long recognized a ratio of 1.8 officers per thousand
residents as a minimum to meet that standard.
Currently we are at 1.6
From "Crime in Idaho" Report for
2004
· Chubbuck Police were 1,6 officers
per thousand population
Based on a population figure of 10,351
17 sxvorn officers = 1.6 per thousand
18 sworn officers = 1.7 per thousand
19 s~vorn officers = 1.8 per thousand
Idaho state average is 1.8
3
How Do We Compare ?
Agency Offenses Officers Ratio
(Group "A" Offenses)
PPD 4,991 88 56.7 / officer
BPD 1,147 24 47.7 / officer
BCSO 836 38 22.0 / officer
Bingham 840 31 27.0 / officer
CPD 1,284 17 75.5 / officer
Offenses Up / Arrest Rate Down
· Three year trend in
arrest rates:
· Five year trend for
Group "A" offenses:
2002 -11.0% 2000 1,172
2003 8.6% 2001 1,187
2004 -16.6% 2002 1,250
2003 1,259
2004 1,284
According to the 2005 estimated
population of 10,655 residents:
10.655 (thousands) x 1.8 = 19.179 officers
needed currently
This doesn't take into account the service
population.
4
Staffing Requirements
The following projection is based on the most
conservative of the population numbers just
given (12,000).
Present by 2010
Sworn officers 17 22
Civilian support 10 / FT 13 / FT
7 / PT 9 / PT
Then and Now
· In 1998
19 sxvorn officers
4 detectives
5 - 15 cases each
- 3,322 documented calls
for service to the police
department
· End of 2004
17 sworn officers
- 3 investigators
average 42 cases ea.
6,187 calls for service
Responding to Needs
Drug Suppression Team
· No previous organized effort
· Currently headed by an investigator from CID and
staffed with interested officers from the patrol division.
· Addresses drug concerns of OUR city.
ROCU participation didn't do much for us because
our detective was xvorking on all of Pocatello's cases.
Also created personnel management problems
because the CPD officer worked out of an office at the
Pocatello Police Department.
o Drugs are a major problem
January-June 2005 (Bannock Co. Prosecutor)
41% cases filed were narcotics
28% cases fried were property crimes
most property crimes are drug
related
o Generates money for our department in forfeitures.
$8900.00 over the last 20 months
o Improves the quality of life for our citizens.
Budget Enhancement Options
Limited Opportunities
but
What can we do to help ourselves?
Driver Safety Education Program
· Drivers cited for moving violations have an
option: Court or DSEP?
· Selective group of traffic violations
· EligibiLity issues
· $60.00 fee to attend a four hour class
· Avoids points on driving record
440 violations in 2004 ~ $60.00 = $26,400.00
Juvenile Diversion Program
· Program where juvenile offenders go through a
CPD program instead of into the court system
· First-time offender requirement
· Eligibility issues depending on violation
· $25.00 administrative fee (previously no charge)
25 per year ~ $60.00: $625.00
Chubbuck Police Training Fund
· Voluntary contributions by various offenders in
the resolution of criminal cases
· In place for many years
· During the last year it paid for:
Dictaphone system $40,000.00
Tasers 12,000.00
Grants
Juvenile Diversion Officer
$9313.00
700 MHz Communications Interoperability
Project
Mandated by DHS
$123,458 already received
$167,474 applied for
$290,932 we xvon't have to come up with!
14% match by us
Infrastructure Needs
· Police department xvas built circa 1980
About 11 members then including the civilian
support personnel / 34 members now
Recent addition to the city offices gave us a new
patrol room, one Sergeants office and an interview
room.
· Animal shelter
Improvements
Currently using $1000.00 from recycled
aluminum cans for muchmeeded kennels
Expansion
"There are them that plan and
them that get to live with the
plan." -- Stephen L. Kent
The Results Group