HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 11 1997DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
February 11, 1997
DESIGN REVIEW SUBJECT: Proposed Storage Sheds on East Chubbuck
Road - ISS Construction, Gary Ratliff.
DATE: February 11, 1997
APPLICANT: Gary Ratliff, 4970 Apache
PROJECT: Site Plan Review - Storage Sheds on East
Chubbuck Road.
Present: Mayor John 0. Cotant, Attorney Holmes, Steve Smart, Kent
Kearns, Ron Conlin, Cary Campbell, Jim Phelps, Cary Campbell,
Larry Kohntopp and Charlie Dickman.
Gary Ratliff presented another site plan for proposed storage sheds
on property he purchase on East Chubbuck Road.
Mr. Ratliff explained his plan, stating he wants to start two of
his storage buildings this summer. Future development will
include four-plexes, etc.
PWD Smart stated, the Council in the past has allowed a building
permit if there is a request for approval of Preliminary Plat
in process.
Mr. Ratliff was told he should apply for the preliminary plat and
zoning change on the April, 1997, Land Use and Development
Meeting.
Mr. Ratliff asked if the 10' landscaping requirement can be waived
to 5' on Burley Drive. Mr. Ratliff was told there can be no
waiver.
Charlie Frasure was present to advise Staff some of his plans.
PWD Smart suggested there be three accesses to Burley Drive from
Frasure Industrial area, to minimize possible long dead end
lengths.
Mr. Ratliff was told utilities are required the full length of the
project.
The Design Review Committee told Mr. Ratliff the site plan Mr.
Ratliff presented should meet the necessary requirements.
�, Zi, PRO
.pk
.57
Z ff" FIA/ MA d
1�1.liql 0 8 A A 0
IN,
G�N FReV X eW
18-10.040
A . Al 1 uses in districts with which the design overlay district
shall be required to obtain design rev�ew is combined
building Permits. clearance prior to obtaining
All applications sha 1 be accompanied by appropriate
architectural and site development plans to scale which shall show structure
locations landscaping plans (includin the landscaping materials to be used
and the location of landscape areasi, permanent existing trees ground
treatment, fences, off-street parking and circulation, location and size of
adjacent streets, north arrow and property lines, drawings ajor exterior
elevations showing building materials and proposed color f em
0 m
grade and proposed mew grades sch e, exi ting
y the Design Review COmmitte - e. All such drawings and plans shall be rev1siewe
B . The Committee (and Council, as appropriate) shall consider the following
matters in reviewing th��ication:
1. Consideration atn 9 to traffic safety and traffic congestion.
a. The effect of the site development Plan on traffic conditions
on contiguous streets.
b. The layout of the site with respect to locations and dimensions
of vehicular and pedestrians entrances exits, drives and walkways.
C. The arrangement and adequacy of 6ff-street parking facilities
to prevent traffic congestion.
d ' The location, arrangement and dimension of truck loading and
unloading facilities.
e. The circulation patterns within boundaries of the development.
f. The surfacing and lighting of off-street parking facilities.
2. Considerations relating to outdoor advertising. The number,
location? color, size, height, lightin and landscaping of outdoor
advertising signs and structures in reyation to the creation of traffic
hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent developments.
3. Considerations relative to landscaping. ,
a. The location heig�t and materials of walls and fences, hedges
and screen plantin6s to insure harmony with adjacent developments or
to conceal storage areas, utility installations or other unsightly
development.
b. The planting of ground'cover and surfacing to -prevent dust and
erosion.
c. The unnecessary destruction of existing healt . hy trees.
1' d.
'i" Complia-nce with the requirement of Charter 18-14 of this Title.
4,. 4.,.% Considerations relating to structures and site 'layout. The
coll-s1'
.,O,eration of exterior.design in relation to adjoining structures in
hei'ght- bulk and area o�enings, breaks in the facades and fencing on
streets, line and pitc of roof and
parcel. arrangement of structures on the
5. Considerations relating to drainage. The effect of the site
development plan in relation to the adequacy of the storm and surface water
drainage proposals.
C. Promptly after receipt of an application for design review clearance
the Committee shall either approve or deny su
an application, the Committee may impose additi ch application. In approving'
onal conditions or 1 mitati
as deemed necessary. Upon granting or denying the application, the i ons
shall specify: Committee
1. The ordinance and standards used in evaluating the application.
2. The reason for approval or denial.
3. The actions, if any, that the applicant could take of obtain a
building permit.
P. The Committee's decision shall be set forth in a written memorandum lodged
'ith the City clerk and shall become final if no written request for review
i, ts bee received the Clerk prior to the conclusion of the next regularl
c heduled City Council meeting.
be reviewed by the CitK Council a If such request is received, the matter shaff
notice furnished to t e develop t 'the next available meeting, with reasonable
upon review, the City Council s er. In approving or denying any apglication
hall follow the procedure of this su sect -ion.
w
N ;5 t-
0. 0
o"
C� Z
20
[a i
0-
.04
00
-1
00
00
Q�l