HomeMy WebLinkAboutJames Reilley L
eirr Govi 'CIL..
CITY OF CHUBBUCK a
FINDI S OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
This matter having cane before the GCEEN4459±e21 for public hearing
pursuant to public notice as re ui red by law, on1 .
upon applicant's application for Ch ngr im eeG9i 2.
/2 LArem?e to
Gaftweittems134:1-AlievVConditional Use Permitevelepreent.,
as follows: "t. 6.064- Lir
Location: go i 1 1
Applicant: �► 3 4
�
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicant has applied for: Uva.„
2. The existing land uses in the area are: to the north, .-1A.444.44441/
d�� � ; to the east,
to the south,
to the west,
3. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as ' ' A,.
4. That the existing zoning of the property is
5. That all legal requirements for notice of the public hearing have been
fulfilled.
6. Owners of adjacent property ha have not expressed of the
application.
7. Relevant criteria and standards for construction of this licaticn
Vare set forth in L
8. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant criteria in
standards are as follows:
A- as L(14C.
1k 4 '
tuAMAB. cMa` � ..w.0
IA A
C. PJUNAMOta tA44.t.t4 CAAt CA4hrst 171•10
D.
E.
B.
G.
H.
I.
Conclusions of Law
1. The use for which the permit is sought imkttAGill not be
injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought w /will not produce an adverse impact on
the economic values of adjacent properties.
3. The permit sought wi /will not produce a negative impact on
transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public parks,
or the natural environment any greater than had the strict terms of the
Land Use Ordinance been satisfied.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use for which
the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with the noice and
traffic conditions now existing in the vicinity deesidoes not indicate that
the permit should be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought /shall not work an
unreasonable hardship upon surramding property owners by virtue of the
legal nature or by the impact of changes made in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualifies of the proposed use t/will not conflict
with the aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands.
7. The applicant haste shown that he has taken all reasonable
steps to canply with the strict terms of the ordinance.
8. Adverse impact on other development within the City will/TAXPiltet
be minimized by the applicant's use sought by the permit.
9.
10.
11. The requested conditional use permit should be granted, subject to
the conditions, if any, set forth hereinafter.
+I w
Decision & Order
1
..J , pursuant to the foregoing,
finds that the request of .. 0y4
fora �41- • ' ,,,A 4 . W mg—
1
. .ed.
CCNDITICNS
CD Or 1 co144-
0 t 14.11:1444.cik.44.joiAtma.z... bolter0 OrAIAAAJAmm4444.141
0 1 if“ ' elMAAA4Zukya *104.2 AWAAAA4101
kiviimAefir► l,rte4.i. _ �-. ._ .�.t.. �u. .... ♦._L
war#1411Ar VA.( 1 CA- ' rally Slat•V.,
1 w `
Motion by: �z�i�t/ , sr ronded by
to adopt the foregoing s of Fact, Conclusions of Law iand Order.
LOLL CALL:
CetM449 i , likAAAvoted
,►r
-- _ Q vv ted
*d _PIA POW ri voted
,, ,,s+1...,• 140VotedtAt
+ ssi.` Voted
f
Tsai,. Voted
�o' siv s ' Voted
on Voted
Ccnutissioner Voted