Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03 06 2019 Study Session
CITY OF CHUBBUCK SPECIAL COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA MARCH 6, 2019 — 3 :OOPM LOCATED AT CHUBBUCK CITY HALL 5160 YELLOWSTONE AVE. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor England COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: AMEND COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA: GENERAL BUSINESS: 1- Presentation on the new City Hall Site Selection Report. 2- Update from Bannock Development Corporation. 3- Update from the Parks Department. 4- Discussion on Building Permits, Parks Impact Fee, and the NWSI Connection Fee. GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS: ADJOURN: City Hall and the City Council Chambers are accessible for persons with disabilities. Any person needing special accommodations to participate in the meeting should contact City Clerk, Rich Morgan at 208.237.2400 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. B W A CHUBBUCK CITY HALL SITE EVALUATIONS ilil Ll I I A u Ok /*TSL . - vlfs7Yr+rY- valky " eww I-:'4 -►N ]dN�IMCl K+v1ir v r,�Oal 3"Mlr 7i i+�'T M5 lis ,wrwl ri rrY *00 -N ►'mglp �wuew �►+ertari'r� r �1RIUViJ•J'rs fYSG� • c.OWwn�r awrxr l-►rrc /y GWTiY� - l�Nt�rr, N 4ir ##Nie�Y f (WAIF � "sr�r�rn4c� • r�aw�K+vrrcewra�r- 7� MtiTyf' .ifY fdOgG�r,`•� evavmA -'*W ft'l Aga,- • rAlor- IA'�r W/tii- tlUIX v A-9 • V�It-,1� -M►v -•i�SGiGtMaew M+ 4 /fuc:i -� R/;=T . +�yrL«�ry- AVW v PV•wr- n�irr�a�+s .flxs�ss �Y�/esY-Irrr Mr+F Amw 9 /r �s.•rr cww�ff� !/A&MP ti a�.eWz-M� ��Y�/14�Ye-s$nl�pi'11tf��riiYi -pw� P"" I s MT .•W dMri�Y %f*4ArS r+n rp Itw oar vwj*vLrY OVA$ MW PWA aswopo klic -• L A#AA 7rwsofl,P rwr rvr kr--A,rwr►.LA**Mrlr • 4 YY -_rrlwo-r4vr�"w T/'WASyam / Yee' cw7' M,*M Io >WNY YP*"- No �p�e✓yvrlfvW' VA 14rCAgrlP~Avwp"Iir-Iv • i! r�R�V"�r/yjr .+avr -�'iwtu- M k1fYtYaN"TYA`- f�x��ii�� ;. r - . pwwn 1 yrrE cAme-irY ryr � u • ,**oor raw "rvz► j orwrwss . ' Pl�cl7Al/rr-tliet�P -F.iGI�rD i1M.SAA'� � wvwrssr/ ArsYr�+or�crrY�//. /*TSL . - vlfs7Yr+rY- valky " eww I-:'4 -►N ]dN�IMCl K+v1ir v r,�Oal 3"Mlr 7i i+�'T M5 lis ,wrwl ri rrY *00 -N ►'mglp �wuew �►+ertari'r� r �1RIUViJ•J'rs fYSG� • c.OWwn�r awrxr l-►rrc /y GWTiY� - l�Nt�rr, N 4ir ##Nie�Y f (WAIF � "sr�r�rn4c� • r�aw�K+vrrcewra�r- 7� MtiTyf' .ifY fdOgG�r,`•� evavmA -'*W ft'l Aga,- • rAlor- IA'�r W/tii- tlUIX v A-9 • V�It-,1� -M►v -•i�SGiGtMaew M+ 4 /fuc:i -� R/;=T . +�yrL«�ry- AVW v PV•wr- n�irr�a�+s .flxs�ss �Y�/esY-Irrr Mr+F Amw 9 /r �s.•rr cww�ff� !/A&MP ti a�.eWz-M� ��Y�/14�Ye-s$nl�pi'11tf��riiYi -pw� P"" I s MT .•W dMri�Y %f*4ArS r+n rp Itw oar vwj*vLrY OVA$ MW PWA aswopo klic -• L A#AA 7rwsofl,P rwr rvr kr--A,rwr►.LA**Mrlr • 4 YY -_rrlwo-r4vr�"w T/'WASyam / Yee' cw7' M,*M Io >WNY YP*"- No �p�e✓yvrlfvW' VA 14rCAgrlP~Avwp"Iir-Iv • i! r�R�V"�r/yjr .+avr -�'iwtu- M k1fYtYaN"TYA`- f�x��ii�� ;. r lJ��eY'St.^6" IXDw0s1'"faKaWti- ,1rlt LUiI�• 1 AMWAt NIV l�rs ryr � u • ,**oor raw > pn moot. . ' Pl�cl7Al/rr-tliet�P -F.iGI�rD i1M.SAA'� � wvwrssr/ ArsYr�+or�crrY�//. •si�s�r�r.,e►rr-� -mrury m � MM rY4P4i7AFAIA 5r � ii7 0 1 i ���� 1 �-� ' G�ftA�1INJrYLDNrrsX r • y�}.Ycfgvo - �;J oms"r ry fts*vw//ypY` -air ------- - -- / - err 1�ra-r►•� t+�r+•� ,v�bY -us* Tl�.rr • a�v+�vrlr�re�:-a�rn►.�r.�ess �,p�,�cKrtss �r>:IwW2s � sawr�s�livYa:+nr� -d+ar� �rRawioG+vvj' ,1 . AISr M • cy,sP,rr+�6,wef�ry- - �gr��, IJP lely s��� a� srs — - — Ga1b ,�ii�Ir4i ef�.r�►-r�llfi7kz07?hm IV AW&WAW OAOV,4r4 CHUBBUCK CITY HALL SITE EVALUATIONS ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: • IMAGE AND VISIBILITY "PRESENCE" • PROXIMITY • ORIENTATION/ACCESS • SITE CAPACITY • COMMUNITY CONTEXT • DISPLACEMENT AND CITY REVENUE • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES AND UTILITIES • PUBLIC AMENITIES SCORING: 4 - EXCELLENT, 3 - GOOD, 2 - FAIR, 1- POOR 7" CITY �Y tk ,H BB� K E EVALUATIONS SIPHON I vlt I -fir -� y _.'•__ � 1 i . • iF h�� � El �yt.��4fy • ��� ''t.�� �� ". j�[,�.Sil� i •` yyJ11T �- ai -�+---�- �" ti� -_ `zC I•_re - iG.: *�. .�.. ✓�.- ��}��} '.�I '1 i F 1 F .-� �� vr, � '+..---.--s1 +i y : .; • -i{ r •tr �_� 4 . •I�•. + L t ,. .'! I• ,s s�r•_1 r# r •' )�'i ) ° .. - T�G'LZ.aT.J.�g �. • - - L � Y � eiE y 1-.- • � � _aiF' 1 4r fir ' t�" - ° }i•' ... '• �� �.,��':t� _,yy�tl�' � � '� � t. -'- J r _` r - .rwfl�� f �'' 4�'6�� n.-: ., _ _ AA L ,�s•.tek f F ems, _ _FF tYil,�,.n•, i '� (- `t,',�� ••y). `,.�'r, - 'til' ,{.li�j-.-;"«'r Ak .y' �, ° �'r. ,'�•-' '~.s. f' I` �` i t we uj � NUDSEN it .\. p f C n1� • :1 i.5� 1Kfur 1 J lap *:f 0 A - PHILBIN ROAD SITE CRITERIA RATING COMMENTS Presence 1 Not a prominent location nor easily seen. Challenging to establish as integral to a downtown setting due to distance from established businesses and residential surroundings and agricultural 'feel' — could be seen as a negative to the neighborhood. Difficuft to project lm -age' - Proximity 1 Feels, dlista,nt from1 1-86 & lYe[lowstonie, challenging to find as a visitor. No other established civic uses currently but planned for a fire station. Not a business district, may take considerable time to establish. Will most likely not be recognizedl as a community focal point. Orientation/Access 2.5 Easy to access visa Chubbuck Rd. to Phifbin M. Property is fully undeveloped. Street side improvements such as sidewalks do not exist. Future fire station could provide shared parking opportunity. Good orientation and site has good distant views to the south and generally pleasant rural feel. Site Capacity 4 Easily (large enough for the proposed City Hialll with no physical site issues. Site configuration aliows for muilltiple. alternative development layouts. Community Context 1 General residential/agricultural surroundling uses limit the ability to establish as a city or 'community center'. Residential scaled architecture reduces options for integrating City Hall architecture, wanting to limit it to lower heights. Site rates low for civic uses. Displacement and City 3 No displalcement and no acquisition costs. Does not eliminate future tax revenue as a city owned parcel. No current structures or uses beyond agriculture. No opportunities for shared uses of Revenue surrounding properties. Proximity reduces desire to develop other civic uses. Economic Development 1 Location does not suggest commitment to a downtown district as a civic anchor. Most likelly wilill not generate other business uses andl rmiay diiscourage residlentiail growth. Public Amenities 2 The site is easily large enough to accommodate added site enhancements such as gathering areas, plazas, etc. No tree cover, all[ agriiculituiral use (lessens aesthetic contributions. Nearby public uses limited to a school south of Chubbuck Rd. Services and Utilities 1.5 Most likely, improvements will be need'edl to Philbin Roads. Possible utility upgrades needed. No street frontage improvements exist. Speed limit of 45 MPH could be a deterrent for site selection. B - RV SITE CRITERIA RATING Presence 2.5 Proximity 2 Orientation/Access 2.5 Site Capacity 3 Community Context 1.5 Displacement and City Revenue 1.5 Economic Development 1 Public Amenities 1.5 Services and Utilities 3.5 TOTAL RATING 19 B - RV SITE CRITERIA RATING COMMENTS Presence 2.5 Good visibility and easy access to the site fronting; Yellowstone Ave., but difficult to project `Image' of downtown. Corridor has serni-indust riall feel. Additional civic use with existing City Hall's conversion to Police Station. Existing surrounding uses do not elevate the locations aesthetics. Fair architectural options. Proximity 2 Feels somewhat distant from 1-86 & Yellowstone; "at the edge of town". although not challenging to find as a visitor. Yellowstone Ave. already established as business corridor, but challenging to be recognized as a communcity focal' point. Orientation/Access 2.5 Easy to access via Yellowstone Ave. from 1-86 and from future interchange at Siphon Rd & 1-15. Street side improvements good. Police station could provide shared parking opportunity. Good orientation and site has good distant views to the east, but generally miixed use feel; housing, businesses, heavy traffic. Site Capacity 3 Large enough for the proposed City Hall with no physical site issues. The site shares an entrance with existing City Hall site configuration allows for more limited alternative development layouts. Community Context 1.5 General residential surrounding uses and mixed commercial limit the ability to establish as a city or `com m unity center'. Lower scaled architecture reduces options for integrating City Hall architecture, but space aillows for more height. Adjacent Polli,ce station and nearby park help to add to civic feell, but surrounding uses will limit a downtown feel. Displacement and City 1.5 D'ispliaces an exi'sti'ng business and will have acq,uirsition costs., will eliminate future tax revenue as a city owned parcel. Small, single current structure to remove. Opportunities for possible shared Revenue uses with Police station. Proximity and current neighborhood uses reduces desire to develop other civic uses. Economic Development 1 Location does not suggest com mitment to a downtown district as a civic anchor. Most l i kely wi I I not generate other business uses related to City Hall due to distance from current center. Public Amenities 1.5 The site is easily large enough to accommodate added site enhancements such as gathering areas, plazas, etc. Little to no aesthetic appeal'. Nearby public uses limited to active recreational park. Services and Utilities 3.5 Access to utilities and infrastructure excellent. Yellowstone Ave. in good condition with frontage sidewalks and landscaping. Overhead utillities detract from site aesthetics. .`..S 4 ;_ - A; OP vit LA E C -NEW DAY SITE CRITERIA RATING COMMENTS Presence 1 Currently poor visibility but enhanced with comipletion of new Siphon ad & 1-15 interchange. Will still be difficult to project `II gage' of downtown diu,e to remoteness of the site. Will be difficult to get to from south driving through Chubbuck. The property has the most topographic change of all the considered sites adding to development costs. Good opportunities to establish- the architectural character of the area. Proximity 1 Extremely distant. Beyond "at the edge of town." Growth of surrounding area may take many years to establish. Most challenging site to be recognized as a commiuinity focal point. Orientation/Access 1.5 Will be easily accessed from future interchange at Siphon Rd & 1-15, but more challenging from 1-86 and Yellowstone Ave. Site is fully undevelloped —no pedestrian access or other public facilities. Very good orientation with exceptional views to the east and south. Interstate noise could be a negative. Site Capacity 3 Easily large enough for the proposed City Hall. Topography could influence site issues. The site will allow for multiple alternative development layouts, but integration with the overall development aster plan will) influence the final layout. Community Context 1 Since it would most likely be the first structure built in the area, this site will greatly limit the ability to establish as a city or'commiunity center'. Will have the ability to establish or influence the architectural style of the area. No adjacent development -- site projects an agricuiltura-l/ rural feel. Displacement and City 2 Totally undeveloped. No displacement of existing uses. The property is being offered) for free, so no expense to acquire the site. Developing here wouldi eliminate private development and future Revenue tax revenue to the city. Proximity reduces desire to develop other civic uses. Economic Development 1 Location does not suggest commitment to a downtown district as a civic anchor. Willlll not imimedliately generate other business uses related to City Hall due to distance from current center. Public Amenities 3 The site is easily large enough to accommodate added site enhancements such as gathering areas, plazas, etc. The varied topography adds to the opportunity to create interesting spaces. Nonexistent nearby pulati1c uses. Services and Utilities 1 No services, roads or utilities exist. City may be responsible for the majority of these improvernent costs -- highest of all sites evaluated. D -BURLEY ROAD SITE CRITERIA RATING Presence 2 Proximity 2.5 Orientation/Access 2 Site Capacity 3 Community Context 3 Displacement and City Revenue 2 Economic Development Public Amenities 2.5 3 Services and Utilities 3 TOTAL RATING 23.0 D - BURLEY ROAD SITE CRITERIA RATING COMMENTS Presence 2 Currently poor viisibi�llity. But this site has the potentiiall to project the "I'mage' of downtown. Located one block east of Yellowstone Ave. and one & % block north of 1-86, the property is chose to the current commercial core. Good opportunities to establish the architectural character of the area. Proximity 2.5 Very close to community entry from the South, and in retation to corporate and buisilness district. Good opportunity for the site to be recognized as a community focal point. Orientation/Access 2 Easily accessed, fro ,1-86 via Yellowstone Ave., the site currently not used for business although there is an existing structure on the property. Good to moderate orientation with good distant views to the south, but only moderate views of surroundling. neighborhood. Street frontage improvements along Burley Dr. and Linden Ave. with sidewalks and landscaping. No adjacent or nearby public parking. The site is within waliking distance to! most heavily developed commercial district in Chubbuck. Site Capacity 3 Easily large enough for the proposed City Hall. The site will allow for multiple alternative development layouts. Expansion opportunities exist. Natural area on the western and! NW area add to the aesthetics.. Community Context 3 The property is close enough to the business district along Yellowstone corridor to have the ability to be recognized as a city or `community center'. Will have the ability to establish or influence the architectural style of the area. Possible future (library to the north will add to civic presence and provide opportunities for shared programs and outdoor space. Could contribute gentrification of the neighborhoodi. Displacement and City 2 Wil] requilre removal of existing structure, but other site preparation costs will be low. No dlispiacement of existing business uses. There will be an expense to acquire this site. Developing Revenue here would eliminate private development and future tax revenue to the city, however it could demonstrate the city's willingness to create a "downtown' ii in an area that could spur addlitional, investments. Proximity increases a desire to develop other civic uses in addition to the library. Economic Development 2 5 Location suggests commitment to ai downtown district as a civic anchor. Could immediately generate interests and other business uses related to City Hall due to distance from current center. Public Amenities 3 The site is easily large enough to accommodate addled site enhancements su-ch as gathering areas,. plazas, etc. The varied vegetation and slight topographic change adds to the opportunity to create interesting spaces. No nearby public uses currently. Services and Utilities 3 Services, roads, and utilities all currently exist. No substantial upgrades anticipated. E - KNUDSEN SITE CRITERIA RATING Presence 3 Proximity 2 Orientation/Access 2.5 Site Capacity 2 Community Context 2 Displacement and City Revenue 1 Economic Development 1.5 Public Amenities 3 Services and Utilities 4 TOTAL RATING 21 E - KNUDSEN SITE CRITEREA RATING COMMENTS Presence 3 Fair visibilllity— can be viewed from 1-86. This site has some opportunity to project the `llmaige' of downtown. Located one and % block west of Yellowstone Ave. and one block north of 1-86, the property is close to the current commercial core. Good opportunities to establish the architectural character of the area, but anticipated, immediate surrounding uses to be medlicall rel!ated. Flat topography, no exceptional limitations. Proximity 2 Very close to community entry from the South, and in relation to corporate and business district. Fair opportunity for the site to be recognized as a community focal) point Orientation/Access 2.5 Easily accessed from 1-86 via Yellowstone Ave. to Knudsen, the site is currently undeveloped. Good to moderate orientation with good distant views to the south, but only moderate view to the north of neighborhood. Street frontage improvements are all in place with sidewalks and landscaping. No adjacent or nearby public parking. The site is within walking distance to most heavily developed commercial district in Chubbuck but is somewhat challenging for pedestrian connections. Site Capacity 2 Easily large enough for the proposed City Hall. The site could allow for multiple alternative development layouts. Expansion opportunities may be challenging without purchase of multiple lots. Poor naturals aesthetics, with no tree vegetation of the property Community Context 2 The property is close enough to the business district along Yellowstone corridor to have the ability to be recognized) as a city or `com unity center'. Would have the ability to establish or influence the architectural style of the area. Surrounding future medical related uses will not enhance the site as a downtown center or help to draw more diversified businesses.. Displacement and City 1 Site preparation costs will be low. No displacement of existing business uses. There will however be an expense to acquire this, site. Developing here would eliminate private development and Revenue future tax revenue to the city. Economic Development 1.5 These sites wilIll be desirable sites for development whether or not the City Hlall' is located here. The anticipated medical uses will generate other related business opportunities. The perception of a commitment to revitalizing neglected or emerging, districts wilill not necessarily be heightened selecting this site. Public Amenities 3 The site could be large enough to accommodate added site enhancements such as gathering areas, plazas, etc. There are no nearby public uses. Services and Utilities 4 Services, roads, and utilities all currently exist in new condition. F - MOTEL SITE CRITERIA RATING Presence 1.5 Proximity 2.5 Orientation/Access 2 Site Capacity 1.5 Community Context 1 Displacement and City Revenue 1 Economic Development 1.5 Public Amenities 1 Services and Utilities 3 TOTAL RATING 15 F - MOTEL SITE CRITEREA RATING COMMENTS Presence 1.5 Best visibillilty viewed, from 1-86. Challenging to orient from Yelilowstone Ave. This site has limited opportu:nity to project the Image of downtown main1y due to its position between two existing motels. Located just YZ block west of Yellowstone Ave. and 1/2 block north of 1-86, the property is close to the current commercial core. Poor opportunities to integrate with the architectural character of the area, but immediate location next to 1-86 is somewhat restrictive. Flat topography, no exceptional site limitations. Proximity 2.5 Very close to community entry from the South, and in relation to corporate and business district. Fair opportunity fo.r the site to be recognized as a community focal point. City Hall developed here could) help in gentrification of the, nei-ghborhoodl and spur conversion of nearby residences to commercial or office use. OOrifrom rientation/Access 2 1-86 accessed' froI-&6 via Yelil'owstone Ave., but immediiaite left onto Burnside is a difficult maneuver without signalized intersection. The site is currently undeveloped. Good to moderate orientation with good distant views to the south and moderate views to the east. Street frontage improvements include older sidewallks but no- landscaping. No adjacent or nearby public parking. The site is within walking distance to most heavily developed commercial district in Chubbuck. Site Capacity 1.5 Large enough for the proposed City Hall, but expansion options would be limited to possibly a single dleveloprnent layouts. Poor natural aesthetics, with no tree vegetation of the property. Roadway noise from interstate could be a negative. Community Context 1 The property is close enough to the business district along, Yellowstone corridor to argue it has the ability to be recognized as a city or `co rrrunity center; but its association with the motel uses either sidelimits its image projectlon. Would have limited ability to establish or influence the architectural style of the area due to surrounding uses. Has reduced options as a downtown center or a draw for more diversified businesses. Displacement and Cit p y 1 As a vacant lot, the site preparation costs will be low. No displacement of existing business uses. There will however be an expense to acquire this site,.. Developing here would) elliminaite private development and future Revenue tax revenue to the city. Economic Development 1.5 This site will be a desirable site for development/redevelopment for a major m otell chain. The perception of a commitment to revitalizing neglected or emerging districts will not necessarily be heightened selecting this site. Public Amenities 1 The site is not large enough to accommodate added site enhancements such as gathering areas, plazas, etc. There are no nearby public uses. Services and Utilities 3 Services, roads, and utilities all currently exist along property's frontage. Sidewalks may needl repairs as will approaches. Street -side landscape needed. Ll • • •��11 q � �r� �{ 'CCU E X Xk C l ., � _ ` `� •+ � : I iG - j. i' 1 � - � � r is ' , • ` � � r - � - - l �{. �_ e��� yLli r�i_ ����-� €SIT � >•. 3 �i�..� f � �{�'-!' ` -a. Ii • �, �- - ! - --1 l � j g `7 1.'t r-r^r T T � F�, 1.Ttlr ,- ' ad 7 77 73 1 AI ICCUh- w,,.. -- --•• -------------- ---- -- ---- ---- ---- -....maw .- El TE POTEN,: y r� �i- )s. �4 i' �• •'�T ` � � ,tom � r Yr.t I _ � I . !Ri l ' L a!,' _ � Y( 3 I 4 fi Pilo AA - lop j FF r �_• >e As 'rYl1 r , T [" i ra I jt - . � k�}, i �-ay a �,j '�• ' _. _. _ _ .t - - � 1 i ' (+'--y���—+r ?'f o it '� fT�•S�l � MINE ,. , ` f. I �� •1' 1i sr•' •il ]_�. \� CJ a` t rr � � i C•" of IL • ti. KNUDSEN J' z� r —: — raw ra�aea a a - i ❑■ { , I Ac - 11 j 1 gL i541kIccu_. _ ;;kj u 1 .. ............ .. _ _... ._.. .... ..__ • � • - __Thi, I-. i i j �`.+ `��w� _ a�'.^F � �t.•. + 41 1-86 � X 1�,�{ .. I Ill"•. '�a, Q.�' P �R- -t .T� f., � p `,�• 4, ir, -+ , E POTEN • R E Nam ++',_,.. 4 " "''fit '�' ;. —* !� t -� . •,_; ' y'. - _ �_y . _ '`�-' 5ilf.. WJE jm� za � .� • l� �_, ��- - �. � • .t�. $MUCK ,►�i'� 1 'i +_ �` ilk sums S 7 LO ��.'�; /1 p a' y� i _• vi. r _i ��r� t� �-a.,�„i� fF fin. •� i� m. �JK 46, _� :Y _ .i.;':..� i e'7F ■QQi 31 t it `l � • � - MI �%j� � {jl _ M ' �' - `�:_ .f1 S ,�' 1 �� �■ aR g Iyf- 1 �ST ��: �� `� +�"or�—r .--.�–..� -� � , -•Lti' ,� T - f. � _ a � l ff� --. .���•�� ,#rLl""._Y;�r�'�� lift �Y �+4 _- _:da •� 1 _'1 "�' iso. i, t r y���. �* i �'r� ..� n KNUDSEN �+ ' I U 24 A R� M elm v — yL i J F oil 71 .y ■ r h. _ �� r�i°r� f t � • . - .. PTETEN _ BANNOCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BDC Highlights of 2016/2018 • 2013 to 2015 Pocatello area average wage/salary grew from $18.02/hr. to $20.36/hr. _ $42,340 annually ($2.34/hr. increase, almost $4,850 annually). Amy's Kitchen Ramp Up Ahead of Schedule • $76,000,000 investment under construction • 1,000 new jobs, 600+ Now Great Western Malting Co. Expansion • $100,000,000 Investment • $307,000,000 expected economic impact • 50,000 additional acres of barley produced • 10 additional jobs On Semiconductor • $100 million investment/ 6 years • 750+ jobs • 76 million invested in 2018-2021 SME Steel • Currently 200+ Western States Caterpillar • $20,000,000 investment • 110 jobs retained • 15 additional jobs Buchanan & Edwards • 50 IT Positions initially, 80 projected FBI Expansion • Data Center 350 Technical Positions 150 Administrative Positions Bully Dog — Old Town Pocatello Location • 50 Professional and Technical Positions ZipKit Modular Homes • 40jobs 2016 California Prospecting Trip Regional Marketing with REDI & EIEDP Your Future In Technology Career Awareness Program Endorsed Statewide 2018- Cold Storage Facility • $33 Million Investment 40-80 jobs Legacy Investors Bannock County City of Pocatello Idaho State University Heritage Investors City of Chubbuck Idaho Central Credit Union Idaho Power Intermountain Gas Fellowship Citizens Community Bank D.L Evans Bank Farmer Bureau Insurance Idaho State Journal Portneuf Health Trust Portneuf Medical Center Cole Chevrolet Wells Fargo Investors J.R. Simplot On Semiconductor Pine Ridge Mall Communitv Investors Arlo Luke Juniper Hills Country Club Bank of Commerce Mutual Insurance Associates CenturyLink Pocatello Chubbuck Auditorium District Cooper Norman Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge, & Bailey Deaton and Company, Chartered Zions Bank Greater Pocatello Association of REALTORS First American Title Company, Inc. Associate Investors D&S Electrical Supply Co. Hirning Buick GMC Alliance Title & Escrow AmeriTitle Gradyn Staley Idaho Building & Contractors Larry & Kathy Bell Acoustic Specialties Andy Akers Black Swan Inn Contractor Sales Dale's Inc. - Rich Kirkham Pioneer Title Company Pocatello-Chubbuck Chamber of Commerce SILVER BRONZE Economy Heating & Refrigeration Johnston Property Management Jones, Chartered Marshall Public Library MSVM Group, LLC P & R Auto Sales, Inc. Sanctuary Wealth Management Phil Joslin Pocatello Roofing, Inc. Steve Brown Terri Azzola United Way of Idaho Want A High -Tech, High -Wage, High -Demand Career? Come to a Career &Technology Expo and discover 9 careers that pay $32,000 to $79,000 per year: Welding Instrumentation/Controls Technicians Nuclear Operating Technology Electrical Engineering Technology Machining Maintenance Engineers/Mechanics Information Technology/Cyber Security Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Diesel Mechanics There will be companies from these fields with demos to show you what these jobs are like. Experience the STEM Demonstration from the Idaho National Laboratories. Bring your parents to check it out. Discover the training at ISU's College of Technology that will help you get those jobs. They will have booths set up to show you how to get ready for that job of your dreams. There will be pizza and prizes, including tablets and drones! Bring your parents to your choice of any of the nine Career and Technology Expos in Southeast Idaho. Each Career and Technology Expo starts at 5:30 pm. if Aberdeen HS (with American Falls) — February 28 ■ Arco HS — March 5 ■ Ft. Hall/Blackfoot/Snake River — Sho-Ban High School — March 27 41 Preston HS (with Westside) — April, 2019 (Date TBD) • Bear Lake HS —April, 2019 (Date TBD) • Malad HS (with Marsh Valley) — April, 2019 (Date TBD) • Soda Springs HS (with Grace and N. Gem) —April, 2019 (Date TBD) Pocatello —Alameda Middle School —April 30, ALL DAY EVENT Pocatello —Alameda Middle School, Parents Night—April 30,630 pm Check out these social pages for more info. Don't forget to use #YourFIT to search or post in all of our social media platforms. YourFIT/Facebook Snapchat Instagram Twitter NMI YajrFIT Your Future in Technology High Tech, High Wage, High Demand Careers YourFITE'■ Your Future in Technology High Tech, High Wage, High Demand Careers There is an increasing demand in Southeast Idaho for technicians in high-tech, high -wage, high -demand careers. Increased technology in the workplace and the wave of baby boomer retirements is creating an acute shortage of these technicians and a great opportunity for your children. Many skilled technical positions offered by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and companies in Southeast Idaho will require post -secondary technical education. Unfortunately, a significant percentage of our students are unaware of the technical careers, their associated salaries, and the training now available at Idaho State University's College of Technology to enter these career fields. YourFIT was formed by the INL, local schools, ISU's College of Technology, Idaho Department of Labor, local governments and economic development agencies to familiarize high school students and their parents with the technical education that is available to prepare them for these high-tech, high -wage, high -demand careers. A list of promising career fields were identified by YourFIT: Welding Instrumentation/Controls Technicians Nuclear Operating Technology Electrical Engineering Technology Machining Maintenance Engineers/Mechanics Information Technology/Cyber Security Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Diesel Mechanics YourFIT will present the job opportunities and explain the training for these fields at nine Career and Technology Expos in Southeast Idaho. The Expos will feature technology displays and hands-on activities. Careers and training will be described by high-tech employers and ISU instructors. Door prizes and refreshments will be offered. Two $500 scholarships will be given to each of the participating schools to award to students at a later date. After YourFIT Career & Technology Expos in 2 prior years, awareness and interest in these technical careers increased by an average of over 20 and 15 percent. The Expo locations are as follows. All Expos start at 5:30 pm. ■ Aberdeen HS (with American Falls) - February 28 ■ Arco HS - March 5 ■ Ft. Hall/Blackfoot/Snake River - Sho-Ban High School - March 27 ■ Preston HS (with Westside) - April, 2019 (Date TBD) ■ Bear Lake HS - April, 2019 (Date TBD) ■ Malad HS (with Marsh Valley) - April, 2019 (Date TBD) ■ Soda Springs HS (with Grace and N. Gem) - April, 2019 (Date TBD) ■ Pocatello - Alameda Middle School - April 30, ALL DAY EVENT ■ Pocatello - Alameda Middle School, Parents Night - April 30, 6:30 pm Please bring your high school student to your choice of any of the Career and Technology Expos listed above. It could lead to a stable and rewarding career your student will enjoy for a lifetime. THANK YOU CHUBBUCK SALES 0 n' t � _� � ? \ I * • • �� _� r .Yo- = • Site Selector's Guild • Select USA w/Commerce, REDI, SIEDO, Idaho Power • PAK/PHARMA with funding • Ten Committees with Board Volunteers COMPLETED MARKETING • 2018 - 8 Site Visits • 2018 Responses - 24 Direct leads, 6 Commerce., 1 -Multi source • Addressing Housing &Contractor issues (labor, market) '*Dashboard —Critical data points HIGH TECH MANUFACTURING inercmy • r - YOUR - r $30-50K/yr. positions eft POWER YOUR N SIPHON ROAD PROJECT MARKETING • Mixed-use, planned, development • 1-15 Interchange scheduled for 2019 • Extensions under construction • RFI referrals • Included in all sales campaigns ipPRTHGATE PARKWAY .. (E SIPHON RD) 9AF �a ,I 7 f 9 FOOD PROCESSING iAmy's Kitchen Debuts Award -Winning Vera Whole Health Center for Employees. The newly constructed facility premiered in July at Amy's Pocatello. ➢1,000 new jobs, 700 now Frigitek (Lion Chase) Cold Storage 40 to 80 jobs Supports Regional Food & Ag Processing H ECONOMIC IMPACT • FBI Expansion — 350 new Data Center jobs & 150 Administrative jobs; 500 total new jobs • 160 spinoff jobs • Wages generate an estimated $65 million economic impact annually. • A driving force behind mall area redevelopment • Construction creates approximately 1,728 jobs and $158 million of economic impact in Southeast Idaho Housing analysis to support New Hires FILLING CAREER POSITIONS • 9 High Tech, High Pay, High Demand Careers: ilnformation Tech Cyber -security; i Instrumentation/Controls iMaintenance mechanics; iDiesel Technicians iUnmannecl Aerial Systems (Drones). iNuclear Operating Tech; iWelding; iOutdoor Electrical; iMachining (CNC). WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ➢RIGHT FIT Professional Development for 8th -12th grade Educators and Career Counselors Strengthen the connection between education and business Awareness of career opportunities ➢ Industry tours ➢ 2 day workshop held at COT Sponsored by INL, ISU and ID Dept. of Labor ➢ Robots, coding, cyber security, UAS energy, machinery & electronics .� - I Lqjbkvls 77 L BANNOCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION iE Iplam Strateaic Mow, L3 CI Parks M'ss*on Statement The City of Chubbuck Parks and Recreation Department is committed to provide our residents and visitors safe and well maintained parks. We strive for diversity in our parks and a recreational facilities. With strategic planning and community involvement our department will be involved in the future growth of park facilities and recreation opportunities in the City of Chubbuck. y Proactive 00-0 we .. yryd iE Iplam Strateaic Mow, L3 CI - Upkeep and improvement on all infrastructure Appearance, safe and clean is important - Use 311 to improve response efforts and planning Itimodal Transportation �"oor'` a v✓ tK'BTPO and other Agencies to Evaluate Bike/Pedestrian System 'fy areas that need to be improved for residents that bike and walk to parks that would make them � 6ejit was safer and easier Thriving Children and Youth Develop Employee Mentorship Programs Through youth service work projects Through social media offer specific skills training to children and youth �, or, Human resource Council to make mentorshi program Work with May p p ram g s - ESTIMATED COST = TOTAL - $90,000.00 MENT Parks 5 Y4ear Plan s aA � a Biceriter7r-!r Park 2019 k .. .: - Remavc old play structure and gravel and replace with new Ainc--nities and fill base with bark, estimated cost $.40,000.00 Cotant Park 2019 f2cp�xint Gazebo Estirnatccd cost = $10,000.00 y _ � L<-:-inds+c~aping by new parking =$,10,000.00 IRS Total for 2019 =_$60,000-00 FV"T" Long Park 2020 W'IW\�: t Pavilion — Estimated cost - $25,000.00 4 picnic tables - Estin-Iateci cost - $2,800.00AE- $27,800.00 ``" Te=anis Courts 2020 - 9 courts -- Estimate --d cost = $50,000.00 TcSta 1 for 2020 = S77.S00.00 Park Meadows 2021 C3etermir�e tot after gathered information and provide nice useable 9'z:a� area for neighborl-iood, Estimated cost = $40,000.00 NONE Espie Park 2021 , _ - Provide pavilion Estimated .cast = $25,000.00 n Total for 2021 =x65,000.00 Bicentennial Park 2022 kms Seek out m<stcl-iing grant for new for hark ,. r Tcota1 for 2022 = $60 000.00 � Parks 02 - 4 but she=lters at 3 parks Total for 2023 = $60,000-00 3/5/2019 Study Session Outline 1) Response to Council questions from last study session 2) NWSI financial obligations 3) Impact Fee questions / facts 4) Compare Impact Fee to current ordinance 5) Review process / intent 1 Response to Council questions from last study session Josh Ellis letter - NWSI fees - Drop to $2,400 - Use 100% connection Addressed in detail in this presentation Josh Ellis letter - Park fee and size - Use $1,200 - Minimum size 45,000 s.f. Council policy on fee Minimum sizes defined in Master Plan 3/5/2019 2 Josh Ellis letter - Storm water retention Multiple methods allowed including use of park areas. Addressed in detail in this presentation Josh Ellis letter Ellis Park Example Comparison - Developer declared cost = $1,609 / lot - Current cash in lieu calculation = $3,880 / lot - Impact Fee = $2,335 / lot (Or equivalent value of improvements) 3/5/2019 3 = 336,000 LN91R.0dTAA1pLt OIOM O6ECrlON ',, TAVfif Ti.aAD1UB ARC {EtOH f)IORDIIIq/N • $39.000 trlear xernerw. n 5103.000 9x.av a j ).000 divided by N Lots - $1,608 ptr lot I Nse'S6tx•w 7Som e•Sr fnt 0",-"- Ca -h1,411, w l�l .;,000 tt $3.660 per tot - �6, ?0 /0 .. <t Eee Calculation iW'6t7r i-rOrl ._.-CURVE TABLE- — LN91R.0dTAA1pLt OIOM O6ECrlON ',, TAVfif Ti.aAD1UB ARC {EtOH f)IORDIIIq/N c+ i trlear xernerw. 563r Sam ss.a• 9x.av a j /t•ttbl' Nse'S6tx•w 7Som e•Sr a9Ae' w r4st$• terarxw ur 1t7.0O 17.91' - nw U iW'6t7r N21'atYPW Nde yq.W a,M' 93e8' U il•9tOk• NM-WWE Td1a 877.00 HS.00 189!1' L., S2.315 per b[e $149.500 Y-A•6p N69'96r'E 337.11' $49,000 Total = $103,000 � r a / DONATEOACRES VALUE f 1 4 Acrg Park tm 13.500.00 per acre 56.000.00 Phase 41 5W, 2,0WAw S,S00.• Phase 42 16 tots 00 Jz �/ Phase t3 13 Lots 5,200.00' I Phase 0461ot2,600,0' Phar#5 L t: 3.200,0• / COPPERFIELD LANDING PARK Sub Tptal 14400.W *All but Blots have been collected by City CoNpylfi�IQiandku Park Efpenfet: Phase p6 Mott 7,2011.00 Spnnkler/timer & power 11,90D.00 iota166 Loef Apx 105,600 sf Hydro seed 10.660.00 If Copperheld Landing cont. BN Inc&mdLrb;j 10or Residential apx 32 bts/ 5600 12900.00 Chain Loop Fence11nealft 5,625.00 1°tai 4 ftew sidalk. ay. 3 3 090 sf 10915.00 QW0 3840000 $4, Total Estimate 3900000 Inclutllnp perimeter /cote saf ooa tR$I1rW 6AO 111 15i- 7DRAFT DRAFT MCW1Y STREET - I 4 Acre Park Land = $54,000 Park = $49,000 Total = $103,000 "103,000 divided by 64 Lots = $1,609 per lot urrent Ordinance Cash -in -lieu $248,000 or $3,880 per lot - 11impact Fee Calculation 4 lots x $2,335 per lot = $1491,500 e 3/5/2019 21 Response to Council questions from last study session Summarize relationship / purpose: - Comprehensive Plan - Parks Master Plan - CIP Plan — Fee Study - Impact Fee Ordinance Comprehensive Plan (2002) • Develop a meaningful park plan • Establish park design standards and guidelines to enable the development of attractive, functional, low maintenance parks that serve as the focal points for neighborhoods and communities • Continue to maintain and develop Cotant Park as the premier park in the... system • Educate developers about the park system, its benefits; and roles that they are expected to play in their developments including park land reserves and fees -in -feu • Require new development to contribute its fair share Of costs to providing park facilities, both in vicinity and larger park needs • Encourage creation of neighborhood parks w/ large development • Create parks master plan w/community packs on both sides of railroad, neighborhood parks in each community, mini park/green/square in each neighborhood • Develop porkstandards • Develop parks to be versatile and flexible to accommodate change in use • Develop park designs that are low maintenance Comp Plan is long-term vision; not regulatory or binding; intended to be flexible. For example, policy called for Chubbuck park east of tracks (now we have the Portneuf Wellness Center which likely fulfills this need) Parks Feedback Loop- Drilling down Parks Master Plan (2018) PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION � ORDINANCE Developers construct and/or City constructs Proposal: Developers Allconstruct and/or Proposal: Seeking quality City constructs park space (area not a measure of good park) MAINTENANCE & Getting area but not quality park space EVALUATION 3/5/2019 5 Response to Council questions from last study session Updated NWSI analysis including NEW assumed densities Addressed in detail in this presentation 3/5/2019 0 NWSI Financial Obligations Design Services $1.4M Paid Land $220K, 0%,2030, $11,000/yr NWSI Debt/ Replacement Funds onstructio 8.5M, 0% 2033, NWS11IL425,0001v Project NWSI CIAWCA Connection $18.5M Fees Project debt to be paid by CIAWCA using connection fees. 3/5/2019 2 3/5/2019 NWSI $18.5M City of Chubbuck Utility Rates Debt covered by utility CDA Grant customers and CDA Grant CIAWCA Connection Fees CIAWCA owes NWSI City CIAWCA $18.5M $16.2 M City of Chubbuck CDA Grant $16.2M $2.3 M Determine Terms of Debt (policy) City of Chubbuck $16.2 M Cor�e�t�or >; Fee -Duration -Interest ? CIAWCA $16.2 M Appendix "G" JUB Study Assumed Planning Area Project Cost Cost Per Acre Density/Acre p of Dwellings Cost Per Dwelling Construction Cost Developed 1358 Undeveloped 6419 $ 48,723,000.00 $ — 7,590.43 2.9 18615 $ 2,617.39 TOTAL 7777 — -- - — _ Debt Service -� Replacement / Depreciation Cost Initital Cost—� $ 48.723,000.00 Replacement Cost $ 558,726,119.76 Sinking Fund Cost $ 18,967,499.89 �- tY� lent Replacement ----- Undeveloped 6419 $ 18,967,499.89 $ 2,954.90 2.9 18615 Fs 1,018.93 Total Connection Fee j— I T IDtal Undeveloped) 6419 $ 10,545.33 2.9 _ a ,.. 18615 I > 3,636.32 3/5/2019 4 Study Method — Actual Project Assumed Planning Area Project Cost Cost Per Acre Density/Acre p of Dwellings Cost Per Dwelling Construction Cost Future Land Use Plan 1625 Creative Community 425 18,450,898.00 County Developments 250 211,583,823.77 Total Area 2300 $ 18,450,898.00 CDA Grant $ (2,280,000.00) Total Area 2300 $ 16,170,898.00 $ 7,030.83 Replacement / Depreciation Cost Initital Cost $ 18,450,898.00 Replacement Cost $ 211,583,823.77 Sinking Fund Cost $ 7,182,796.75 $ 7,182,796.75 Total Area 2300 Total Connection Fee Total Area 2300 Determine Terms of Debt (policy) City of Chubbuck $16.2 M 2.9 4712.5 5 2125 0.5 125 3.0 6%3 $ 2,322.57 Debt Service Replacement $ 3,122.96 3.0 6963 $ 1,031.64 To $ 10,153.78 .., _ 3.0 6963 Fees -Duration CIAWCA $16.2 3/5/2019 5 Policy on Debt Repayment Percentage of Connections Total EDU Years of Growth 20 30 40 50 1 82 Years to Pa o 100% 6963 348 232 174 139fins 90% 6266 313 209 I 125 U/0 5570 > 219 186 139 111 w 70% 4874 0 244 162 122 E 60% 4178 Z 209 50% 3481 174 116 Study Recommendation I 3/5/2019 10 Policy on Debt Repayment Percentage of Connections Total EDU Years of Growth 20 30 40 50 100% 6963 348 232 174 139 90'/0 6266 a 313 i 209 157 125 801/o 5510 a � 279 �r 186 W i 139 111 70% 4874 w 244 162 122 97 E 601/0 4178 Z 209 139 104 84 Current Permits 50'/0 3481 174 116 Study Recommendation j Policy on Debt Repayment Percentage of Connections Total EDU Years of Growth 20 30 40 50 1 82 Years to Pa o 100% 6963 348 232 174 139fins 90% 6266 313 209 I 125 U/0 5570 > 219 186 139 111 w 70% 4874 0 244 162 122 E 60% 4178 Z 209 50% 3481 174 116 Study Recommendation I 3/5/2019 10 This page intentionally left blank Policy on Debt Repayment Debt to City Year Percentage of Connections 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% $ 16,170,898 2012 Policy on Debt Repayment $4,192.76 Required Percentage of $6,708.42 Connection Fee Connections Total EDU $ 3,354.21 100% 6963 $ 3,726.90 90% 6266 $ 4,192.76 80% 5570 $ 4,791.73 70% 4874 $ 5,590.35 60% 4178 $ 6,708.42 50% 3481 Policy on Debt Repayment Debt to City Year Percentage of Connections 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% $ 16,170,898 2012 $3,354.21 $3,726.90 $4,192.76 $4,791.73 $5,590.35 $6,708.42 2013 $3,454.84 $3,838.71 $4,318.55 $4,935.48 $5,758.06 $6,909.67 2014 $3,558.48 $3,953.87 $4,448.10 $5,083.55 $5,930.80 $7,116.97 2015 $3,665.24 $4,072.49 $4,581.55 $5,236.05 $6,108.73 $7,330.47 2016 $3,775.19 $4,194.66 $4,718.99 $5,393.13 $6,291.99 $7,550.39 2017 $3,888.45 $4,320.50 $4,860.56 $5,554.93 $6,480.75 $7,776.90 2018 $4,005.10 $4,450.11 $5,006.38 $5,721.58 $6,675.17 $8,010.21 2019 $4,125.26 $4,583.62 $5,156.57 $5,893.22 $6,875.43 $8,250.51 2020 $4,249.01 $4,721.13 $5,311.27 $6,070.02 $7,081.69 $8,498.03 3/5/2019 7 Council Discussion and Direction to Mayor Impact Fee Questions / Facts Impact Fee Questions / Facts Do impact fees effect department capital budgets? - Yes - Either the increased demand is paid by impact fees or by an increase in general fund tax (i.e. tax increase or service decrease) Is the proposed fee of $2,335 really a $1,900 increase from the existing $400 guarantee? - Apples and oranges. The $400 is NOT a cash in lieu fee and not part of current ordinance. It is a security mechanism that is returned to the developer when the park is complete. Does removal of park areas increases storm water cost? - Potentially. - There are multiple methods to accommodate storm water treatment and storage. - Park area may still be used as storm water basins as long as the storm water system isn't a detriment to the functionality of the park area. - By EPA requirements and Chubbuck storm water ordinance, each project (commercial / residential) is required to treat and dispose of the storm water created by the project. Why make development pay rather than the entire city? - This is a policy decision. - The intent of impact fees assigns the fee to those who create the demand. Will the new park impact fees increase the cost of a building permit by $2,335? - First, this is NOT a new fee. - Second, the proposed fee compared to existing cash -in -lieu ordinance is a reduction of cost. o (It is an increase from the negotiated cash -in -lieu amount being applied) - If the developer elects cash -in -lieu, the combination of Police, EMS and Parks fees collected at building permit does results is an increase total fee. (see attached example). However, the builder would pay a lesser amount for the lot resulting in No Net Increase. Why not leave the existing cash -in -lieu ordinance in place? - Policy decision. - Varied results to the calculation. - Each development negotiated and approved by Council. The NWSI fee is too high and should be reduced. - Although this fee contributes to the overall cost of a building permit, the fee is not related to Park Impact Fee, Park CIP or Park Master Plan. Can developer still build their own parks? Can they be maintained by HOA? - Yes. - We still value and encourage neighborhood parks. - HOA maintenance is preferred. What is the criteria for park space? - The existing criteria is based on "Area" 5 acres per 1,000 residents. - The impact fee criteria is based on "Value of Amenities" Is the goal to stop developer from building parks and only accept cash -in -lieu? - No. - The goal includes increasing the quality of developer built parks. This is accomplished by eliminating the standard of "Area" required and replacing it with "Value of Amenities" - The monies collected by the impact fee will be used on system improvements in accordance with the CIP such as: o Destination parks o Trail networks o Downtown public spaces o Improvement to existing community parks (benefit of entire community) Don't we have enough parks? Do we need to maintain the level of service? - Policy decision. - Reliance on residents input. Will private parks / amenities count towards park requirement? - No. - Private owned and maintained spaces, not available for public use will not qualify. - These residents will still use public parks. Are small park areas allowed? - Absolutely. - Small well planned areas make great public space. - Minimum size defined by ordinance and Master Plan. $16,000.00 $14,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 S- BEFORE / AFTER COMPARISON $14,435.00 $13,712.00 $9,643.00 $8,826.00 1 Integrity is increase of $723 Grove is increase of $817 Briscoe is increase of $106 'Increase from the negotiated / reduced fee in current ordinance. Integrity Before J Integrity After d Grove Before Grove After V Briscoe Before id Briscoe After $7,193.00$7,299.00 Compare Current Cash -In -Lieu to Proposed Impact Fee Ordinance Comparison of Current Cash -in -lieu vs Impact Fee Ordinance Topic / Question Current Park and Cash -in- Parks Impact Fee lieu Ordinance Ordinance Does the ordinance support the goals of the Parks Master Plan? No Yes Does the ordinance allow developer to construct Neighborhood Parks? Yes Yes Following the calculations in each ordinance, what is the Cash -in -Lieu Approx. $4,000 per Lot Not to exceed $2,335 (SFR) amount? How is the Cash -in -Lieu amount Ordinance ....... Calculation determined? produces varied results Impact Fee Study (based on lot size and value) Does the ordinance allow "fee credits" for quality parks constructed by No Yes developers? If developers elect to construct the park facility, is a fee added to the No No building permit? If developers elect to provide Cash -in - Lieu, how is the fee collected? Building Permit Building Permit How is the park requirement By "area" - 5 acres per 1,000 „ BY value $2,335 per SFR calculated? residents Does the ordinance apply to non- residential uses? No No Does the ordinance apply to multi- family PUD developments? No Yes Yes, as long as the storm Can the project use the park area for water function does not storm water retention? Yes diminish the intended use as public space / park. Ordinance ...... sidewalk, droop Who determines the amenities to be fence, sprinkler system, Amenities proposed constructed by the developer? hydro seed, chain link developer and approvedd by exterior City Does the ordinance allow parks to be constructed and maintained by HOA Yes Yes Review Process / Intent Public Hearings /Study Sessions 2018-2019 Varied Testimony /Topics /Discussions - Building permit comparisons - Why NEW Fees - One-time fee vs taxation - NWSI fee - Developer allowed to build parks - Fee credits - Stop growth - Storm water - Intent of Parks Master Plan Some Facts, Some Opinion, Some Misunderstanding 3/5/2019 1 3/5/2019 Revisit the Purpose, Process and Intent WHAT WHY HOW Minimum Park Size - Set at 15,000 (.33 ac) by Ordinance - Eliminate "leftover areas" dedicated as parks Cash -in -Lieu - Current ordinance cost per lot was to high - Integrity Estates example - Per ordinance $4,100 per lot - Negotiated reduced cost to $2,138 - Applied similar negotiated reduction to other developments Determined need to create consistent / fair method of fee determination - Impact Fee Study - Parks Master Plan / CIP 3/5/2019 3 3/5/2019 • Small Community Open Spaces • Often Under -Utilized Space i•"AREA" Criteria • High Cost of Maintenance Master• Community Vision Pl • Planned Implementation 'nned * "AMENTITY" Criteria • Component of Comprehensive Plan Parks 4 Current Park Development Process Current Cash inLieu Process Develo Approval * Plats Calculated � Fee ° Per Lot at Building | Permit °VVithouta K4asterp|an, these dollars are not committed. °This isan Impact Fee 3/5/2019 5 k Pomar[suaraae ° Refund Plats teeMast�Ran 6uaran (not cash in ° Assume Park lieu) Operations ° Maintenance | | | | ° Equipment Current Cash inLieu Process Develo Approval * Plats Calculated � Fee ° Per Lot at Building | Permit °VVithouta K4asterp|an, these dollars are not committed. °This isan Impact Fee 3/5/2019 5 3/5/2019 Funding Good Public Space Doesn't Need, Impact Fees, Budgets, Happen by Grants Accident. -Amanda Burden, VISIOn Parks Planner Development FUNCTIONAL - — PARKS Park Master Plan - Industry Input Goals and SYSTEM objectives Community Resident Input Regional View L 3/5/2019 Ordinance 206 —1979 Required Dedication of Parks - Population Ratio - Criteria for Cash in Lieu Ordinance 374 —1992 Established - Improvement Standards - Clarified "Fair Market Value" Ordinance 754 — 2016 Established Minimum Park Size - 15,000 sf Development Impact Fee I.C. 67-8201— 67-8213 Empowers Cities to Implement Development Fees - Sets Criteria Establish Advisory Committee - 5 members, 2 from industry Procedure - Capital Improvement Plan — Park Master Plan - Impact Fee Ordinance - Both require separate Public Hearings Operations - Accounting, refunds, appeals, credits 3/5/2019 Determine Parks Vision — Minimum Standards vs Master Planned If Minimum Standards (current ordinance) - Strengthen guarantee (reduce risk) - Acknowledge that cash in lieu is an "impact fee" If Master Planned - Capital Improvement Plan - Impact fee study / ordinance Q Park Master, Plan 201-7-201111- 8 In your opinion, are the services you receive from the City of Chubbuck worth the taxes you pay? (Consider police, fire, parks, sanitation, streets, water, etc...) Definitely yes Probably yes Might or might not Probably not Definitely not ma 12e uc ieo tea zoo zzo 3/5/2019 Vol, How important is public recreation and parks to you at the present time? Extremely important I Very importanten Moderately important v Slightly important Not at all important =33 j_._.._.T F 0 til 40 w w too in w IN 3/5/2019 I to] In your opinion, should the City of Chubbuck provide additional outdoor recreational facilities? Ves No 3/5/2019 11 Impact Fees Overview City of Chubbuck Z10N5 ©n PURLJC FINANCF, INC. Impact Fee 101 A one-time fee charged to new development to offset the capital costs of public infrastructure associated with that new development Each entity that intends to impose impact fees must have a "CIP" Capital Improvement Plan Impact Fee Analysis/Ordinance — Level of Service Impact Fee Analysis/Ordinance — Proportionate Share 3/5/2019 12 Impact Fee Committee Impact Fee Committee - 5 members, at least 2 from the development/real estate community Recommended adoption of calculated impact fee per Zions Public Finance analysis Fee determine to be $2,335 for SFR and $2,195 for MFR x� Working to a Decision 3/5/2019 13 WHAT - Master Planned Park System - Exchange "Area" for "Quality" WHY - Comprehensive Plan - Resident Survey - Strategic Plan Elements - Create Quality Community HOW Impact Fees Developer Options for Increased Quality Revisit the Purpose 3/5/2019 _ 14