HomeMy WebLinkAbout005 03 90LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
May 4, 1990
Minutes of the regular meeting of the Land Use and Development
Commission held in the city municipal building Nay 3, 1990.
Present: Chairwoman Sue Parrish, Commission Members: Kent Kearns
Richard Pearson, Nyrna Cain, Bob Anderson, Council
Representative Dean Wood, Engineer Steve Smart, Attorney Tom
Holmes, and Secretary Myrna Crapo.
Meeting called to order by Chairwoman Sue Parrish at 8:00 pm.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish asked for corrections or additions to the
minutes of the March 1, 1990 meeting· There being none Kent
Kearns moved to approved the minutes of March 1, 1990 meeting
with Richard Pearson seconding. All commission members voted
in favor.
PUBIC HEARING:
A PROPOSAL BY DENNIS GAIL ROGERS, 4848 TRENT, TO OPERATE
A MINI STORAGE at 212 E. Chubbuck Road. Property is
presently zoned General Commercial. (C-2)
Chairwoman Sue Parrish opened the public hearing.
Chairwoman Parrish asked for a report by the city staff.
Steve Smart reviewed the property zoning, adjacent
zoning, length of lot, and building code requirements·
James Humble, 230 E. Chubbuck Road asked Mr. Rogers and
the commission to picture the business completed, would
they really want that type of business there.
Dennis Rogers, 4845 Trent told the commission that there
intent was to provide businesses with a place to store
their equipment, that they couldn't store on their
property. They would meet the city code requirements when
they built the storage sheds.
The service bay shops would be like a regular mechanic
shop and would be rented out. There would be not outside
access, access would be strictly interior with a entrance
gate. The storage unit would be opened all day and then
closed at night·
Dee Howell, 224 E. Chubbuck Road requested that they put
up a fence and that there be no outside storage·
Land Use & Development
Nay 3, 1990
Page 2
DENNIS ROGERS PUBLIC HEARING (CONT.D)
Connie Howell, 224 E. Chubbuck Road questioned Dennis
Rogers about how the storage units would sit in
comparison to their property. They would like them to
match their existing fence from the property line to the
back of the house by the tree.
Dennis Rogers told the commission that he would build a
fence from the storage area to the street. There would
be lights at each corner on the inside of the storage
units. They would be mounted on the building.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish closed the public hearing·
The commission then discussed the storage sheds.
Kent Kearnes put a motion to the floor that we grant a
conditional use for the property located at 212 E.
Chubbuck Road it being in compliance with the long term
goal of the comprehensive plan and being allowed by
18.24.040 but with the following restrictions:
The development of the storage area be
restricted to the area as depicted in the site
map supplied with the application
That the owners adequately address all of
Cary's concerns to Cary's satisfaction and to
code.
That a 6' lx6 cedar fence be constructed from
the frontage on East Chubbuck Road parallel on
the property line to the start of the storage
sheds as per ordinance requirements.
So long as none of the conditions that are addressed in
18.28.040 section C 1-16 under granted conditional use
permits, creat problems·
Richard Pearson seconded the motion. Roll call vote:
Myrna Cain, yes; Bob Anderson, yes; Sue Parrish, yes;
Kent Kearns, yes; Richard Pearson, yes; Dean Wood, yes.
Land Use and Development Commission
Page 3
Nay 3, 1990
GENERAL BUSINESS:
DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO DEFINE ADULT
BUSINESS in the schedule of land use controls.
The commission then discussed the proposed ordinance·
It was felt that the ordinance needed to include the
state statutes.
After discussing the ordinance it was decided to hold it
over until the next meeting.
2. DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO DEFINE SELF-SERVICE
STORAGE facilities in the schedule of land use controls.
The commission reviewed the proposed ordinance. Steve
Smart showed the commission a pamphlet from planning and
advisor service's on self-service storage facility,
It was decided that this ordinance be held over until the
June meeting.
The commission decided to dispense with the 7:00 pm
training meetings until September. The regular meetings
will start at 8:00 p.m.
The commission adjourned at 9:20 pm.
Sue~ Parrish~ Chairwoman
Myrna C~oo, secretar'~
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
This matter having come before the Commission for public
hearing pursuant to public notice as required by law, on May 3,
1990, upon the application of Dennis Gail Rogers, (hereinafter
referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use permit to
operate a mini -storage (self service storage facility) on the
real property located at 212 E. Chubbuck Road and the Commission
having heard testimony from interested parties and being fully
advised in the matter, now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit as
particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have
been met.
3. The property in question is zoned C-2 pursuant to the
Land Use Ordinance of the City of Chubbuck.
4. The property is designated as C-2 in the duly adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevant criteria and standards for consideration of
this application are set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6512 and
in Chubbuck Code section 18.28.040 (C).
6. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant
criteria and standards are as follows:
A. Applicant and persons occupying two adjacent residences
reviewed with the Commission the location of the storage facility
with reference to the immediately adjoining residence and a barn
in back of that residence.
B. The proposed storage facility sits back from the
adjacent residence.
C. The only apparent problem is car lights and lack of
privacy from people entering the front of applicant's property to
access the proposed storage facility.
D. The proposed storage facility is designed in a "U" shape
1,11N with all doors facing inward. The facility would be built on or
near the property line and the outside walls would be solid.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 1
chbbck05.093
4— c 3 1
E. Applicant agrees to install a 6' cedar 1 x 6 fence from
the start of the storage facility to the front of the property to
the east property line.
F. The traffic impact of this type of facility to East
Chubbuck Road and other area roads is minimal.
G. The facility would be lit at night, but applicant
indicates he would minimize the impact of the light upon the
residential properties in the area.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and
Development Commission hereby enters the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought will not be
injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the
public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought will not produce an adverse impact on
the economic values of adjacent properties.
3. The permit sought will not produce a negative impact on
transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public
.-� parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict
terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use
for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with
the noise and traffic conditions now exiting does not indicate
that the permit should be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought shall not work
an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding property owners by
virtue of its physical natures or by the impact of changes made
in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use will not
conflict with aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other
development within the City has been minimized by Applicant as
much as is reasonable possible.
8. Owners of adjacent property have expressed approval of
the issuance of the requested conditional use permit, subject to
the conditions about the fence.
9. The requested conditional use permit, if granted,
should be maintained subject to the conditions set forth below.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2
chbbck05.093
DECISION
1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the
foregoing, finds that the request of the applicant should be
approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, are hereby imposed
upon the granting of said conditional use permit and applicant,
by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to the
imposition of the same:
A. The facility will comply with the building codes
as required by the City.
B. The facility will not violate the provisions of
Chubbuck Municipal Code 18-28-040(c).
C. Applicant will install a 6' cedar 1 x 6 fence
along the east property line, from the corner of his storage
facility to the front, except the fence will be lessened in
height where required by City ordinance.
3. The conditional use permit requested by the Applicant is
granted, subject to the foregoing conditions.
DATED this day of , 1990.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
By:uz�
hairman
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 3
chbbck05.093