HomeMy WebLinkAbout006 07 90LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
June 7, 1990
Minutes of the regular meeting of the Land Use and Development
Commission held in the city municipal building June 1, 1990.
Present: Chairwoman Sue Parrish, Commission Members: Pete
Anderson, Myrna Cain, Bob Anderson, Kent Kearns; Councilman
Dean Wood; Engineer Steve Smart, Project Engineer Gerd Dixon,
Attorney Tom Holmes, Secretary Myrna Crapo.
Meeting called to order by Chairwoman Sue Parrish at 8:00 pm.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish asked for approval of the minutes as written
and mailed· Kent Kearns asked for the following corrections:
1. On page 2 add s to restriction; 2. correct the spelling for
depicted; 3. under item #2 after "satisfaction" insert the
word "and".
Kent Kearns moved to approve the minutes with those
corrections. Myrna Cain seconded, with all commission members
voting in favor.
PUBLIC HEARING:
A PROPOSAL BY DOUGLAS & LAREE ANDERSON, 848 W. 150 N.
BLACKFOOT, ID FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PLACE A
DOUBLE WIDE TRAILER AT 312 ADAMS, property is presently
zoned Limited Residential (R-2).
Chairwoman Sue Parrish opened the public Hearing.
Darold E. Burrows, 302 Adams told the commission that he
had sold this piece of ground to the Andersons. They
will be living next door to them and that they had no
objections to the trailer.
LaRee Anderson, 848 W. 150 N. Blackfoot, explained to the
commission what the trailer looked like, and then showed
some pictures of the trailer. They kept their yard well
landscaped and had in the past won a Chubbuck Pride
Award.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish closed the public hearing and
opened the meeting to discussion by the commission.
The commission then discussed the type of foundation that
was required by the chubbuck's code.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
JUNE 7, 1990
PAGE 2
Pete Anderson made a motion to grant the conditional use
permit for Douglas and LaRee Anderson to place a double
wide trailer at 312 Adams with the condition that it
comply to all the building ordinances and the Land Use
Ordinances regarding the Class II Production Dwelling in
a R-2 zone. Myrna Cain seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: Pete Anderson, yes; Myrna Cain, Yes; Bob
Anderson, yes; Sue Parrish, yes; Kent Kearns, yes; Dean
Wood, yes.
GENERAL BUSINESS:
DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO DEFINE ADULT
BUSINESS in the schedule of Land Use Controls.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish read the ordinance and then the
commission discussed it.
Pete Anderson moved to present this for a public hearing
at the next regular Land Use Commission Meeting. Myrna
Cain seconded, all commission members voted in favor.
DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO DEFINE SELF-SERVICE
STORAGE FACILITIES in the schedule of land use controls.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish read
commission then discussed:
the ordinance. The
1. Storage units being used as a second business
2. Automotive repair by renters
3. Hazardous chemicals being stored.
4. Fire wall that would be required
5. Storage units behind apartments for tenants or for
other renters.
6. C-2 Zone needing additional guidelines
a. Paved asphalt
b. Landscape
c. Security fences
7. Being allowed conditionally in residential zones·
a. needs to be compatible with the area
The commission asked attorney Tom Homes to work on the
ordinance and present it at the next meeting.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
JUNE 8, 1990
PAGE 3
a
DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO MODIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ordinance.
Chairwoman Sue Parrish read the ordinance.
The commJssion then discussed:
a. The Deadline date
b. Reasons for landscaping
c. The way we want Chubbuck to look in the future
Pete Anderson made a motion to hold a public hearing on
this ordinance. Myrna Cain seconded the motion. All
commission members voted in favor.
Kent Kearns moved to adjourn at 9:30 pm with Dean Wood
seconding.
Su~ Parrish, Chairwoman
Myrna'b~apo, secretarY'
CITY OF CHUBBUCK
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
This matter having come before the Commission for public
hearing pursuant to public notice as required by law, on June 7,
1990, upon the application of Douglas and LaRee Anderson
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") for a conditional use
permit to place a double wide mobile home (production dwelling)
on the real property located at 312 Adams and the Commission
having heard testimony from interested parties and being fully
advised in the matter, now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit as
particularly described above.
2. All legal requirements for notice of public hearing have
been met.
3. The property in question is zoned R-2 - Limited
Residential pursuant to the Land Use Ordinance of the City of
Chubbuck.
4. The property is designated as R-2 - Limited Residential
in the duly adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Chubbuck.
5. Relevant criteria and standards for consideration of
this application are set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6512 and
in Chubbuck Code section 18.28.040 (C).
6. The facts relevant to an evaluation of the relevant
criteria and standards are as follows:
A. This unit will meet the requirement of a Class II
Production Dwelling as set forth in Section 18.04.050(P)(2) of
the Chubbuck Municipal Code.
B. LaRee Anderson was present and passed around photographs
of the unit as it now sets in its present location in Blackfoot,
Idaho.
C. Testimony from Darrell Buroughs, 302 Adams Drive, who
sold the lot to applicant, was received in support of the
application.
D. Written testimony from Troy and Lou Galloway was
received showing no opposition to the application.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 1
chbbck06.132
E. No one else appeared in favor of or against the
application.
F. Applicant will put a concrete foundation under the
unit.
G. Other production units are located in the vicinity of
312 Adams.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Land Use and
Development Commission hereby enters the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The use for which the permit is sought will not be
injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the
public health, safety or welfare.
2. The permit sought will not produce an adverse impact on
the economic values of adjacent properties.
3. The permit sought will not produce a negative impact on
transportation facilities, public utilities, schools, public
parks, or the natural environment any greater than had the strict
terms of the Land Use Ordinance been complied with.
4. The noise and traffic conditions generated by the use
for which the permit is sought, when analyzed in conjunction with
the noise and traffic conditions now exiting does not indicate
that the permit should be denied.
5. The use for which the permit is sought shall not work
an unreasonable hardship upon surrounding property owners by
virtue of its physical natures or by the impact of changes made
in the landscape of the land.
6. The aesthetic qualities of the proposed use will not
conflict with aesthetic qualities of the surrounding lands.
7. The adverse impact of the proposed use on other
development within the City has been minimized by Applicant as
much as is reasonably possible.
8. Owners of adjacent property have expressed approval of
the issuance of the requested conditional use permit.
9. The requested conditional use permit, if granted,
should be maintained subject to the conditions set forth below.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 2
chbbck06.132
DECISION
1. The Land Use and Development Commission, pursuant to the
foregoing, finds that the request of the applicant should be
approved.
2. The following conditions, if any, are hereby imposed
upon the granting of said conditional use permit and applicant,
by taking advantage of said conditional use permit agrees to the
imposition of the same: All land use and building code
requirements for putting a class II production dwelling in an R-
2, Limited Residential area must be followed.
3. The conditional use permit requested by the Applicant is
granted, subject to the foregoing conditions.
DATED this 2- day of , 1990.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
2 -
By:
C_airman
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION - Page 3
chbbck06.132