HomeMy WebLinkAbout002 04 93LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
February 4, 1993
Minutes of the regular meeting of the Land Use and Development
Commission held in the city municipal building February 4,
1993.
Present: Chairman Kent Kearns, Commission Members: Richard
Pearson, Mary Harker, Gayle Anderson, Pete Anderson, Myrna
Cain, T. Kent Hill; Attorney Tom Holmes, public works director
Steve Smart, Project Engineer Gerd Dixon and Secretary Myrna
Crapo.
Chairman Kent Kearns called the meeting to order at 8:30 PM.
Chairman Kearns asked for approval of the January 7, 1993 minutes.
Myrna Cain moved to approve the minutes with Mary Harker
seconding. All commission members voted in favor.
Chairman Kearns asked if any member of the commission had a
conflict of interest with anything on the agenda. There was
none.
PUBLIC HEARING
A PROPOSAL BY JOE OSIER, 11010 W. HICKORY, BOISE, IDAHO FOR A
REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MISTI MANOR SUBDIVISION located
near SE corner of Hawthorne (4700 block and W. Chubbuck Road
(400 Block).
Chairman Kearns opened the public hearing and asked if the
staff had any additional comments.
Mr. Osier asked the city if 1. the 8' set back would just
include his property. 2. If he needed to make the irrigation
available to property past his, 3. The willingness of the city
to contribute to the 16" water line, 4. Paying cash in lieu of
land for the park requirements. 5. Moving one hydrant and
thus eliminating a hydrant.
Pete Anderson expressed concern with lot 6 and 21 because of
their size and questioned if they were going to be for
duplexes. Mr. Osier had thought about making them duplex's
but wasn't sure if they would be conducive to the
neighborhood.
The commission expressed concern about the cul-de-sac; whether
it would have adequate fire and emergence vehicles access.
This need to be check out as there may be a potential problem.
Kimberly Lane is a duplicate street name and will need to be
renamed. The city needs to be aware of how the canals join to
avoid future problems.
Land Use and Development Commission
Page 2
February 4, 1993
The public hearing was closed and put back to the commission
for discussion.
Pete Anderson moved to recommend to the city council approval
of the preliminary plat with the conditions as outlined in the
staff report and 1. the negotiation on the 16" water line 2.
with the condition that the cul de sac on Joseph Street and
the corner of the property where Stuart lateral and Redman
Canal come together be further examined to see if we are going
to have a potential problem with future development. Gayle
Anderson seconded the motion
Roll call vote: Myrna Cain, yes; Richard Pearson, yes; T.
Kent Hill, yes; Pete Anderson, yes; Kent Kearns, yes; Mary
Harker, yes; Gayle Anderson, yes.
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN BRIARWOOD MOBILE HOME
COURT.
Ron Johnson of Almo, California explained to the commission
what they were proposing to do at Briarwood trailer court.
There are 138 parcels that they would reduce to 104. There
would be four different models of Class II Production homes
that people could chose from. A person would decide the type
of home he would like to have and the lot they would like it
to sit on. Mr. Johnson would then order the home. They are
planning to have car ports, with the option of garages and
landscaping.
The lots would sell for about $60,000.00 and would range from
1232 square feet to 1500 square feet. The rear yard would be
designated as open space, with a pathway of possible asphalt.
The manufactured homes would be placed on permanent
foundations and there would be landscaped quiet spaces.
Randy Spencer, 2712 Jerome Drive, a realtor for the area
explained the housing situation in the area. He felt that
this price range was good and that we have needed this type of
development in the area. Financing would be available. They
would like to secure FHA financing for the homes.
Class II Production homes are permitted in R-2 and R-1 areas
on a conditional use permit.
Land Use and Development Commission
Page 3
February 4, 1993
Steve Smart, Public Works Director expressed concern with
greenwa¥ being lacking as required in a P.U.D. With a common
area at the back of the lot lines it would solve that part of
the problem. They would be asking for a 10% increase in
density because they had provided the common area.
The commission discussed:
1. The size of the yard whether to have it large enough to
have a dog or small enough that there would be no maintenance.
2. The P.U.D. requirements of the city ordinance.
3. The existing situation with the sidewalks, street width and
etc.
The commission members were in favor of this concept and felt
that it would be a good addition to the area.
Mary Harker moved to adjourn at 10:05 pm with T. Kent Hill
seconding.
~ Kearns, Chairman
Myrna Cr~), Secretary~